Would schools support a walk-out by PRO-LIFE STUDENTS??

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Or pro-gun students? How about pro-merit students opposed to affirmative action? Or pro-american students opposed to illegal aliens?

Schools should not take sides on political issues or they're gonna have a mess on their hands.
 
That has nothing to do with school dumbass. It's a pitiful attempt at an argument, and has nothing to do with school. Literally, and obviously nothing at all. Could you make a more stupid argument? You can protest whatever you want, but if it's not school related, and is personal, you can't expect shit. You will be graded as if you're simply skipping. It's the same thing as workers stopping work, and protesting a dangerous work environment. Think before you vomit up opinions based on nothing, but angry biases. Why the hell are you upset that some children refuse to go to school in these dangerous conditions, and are trying to send the message out their for us all? It's abhorrent, Micro Peen.
 
Last edited:
Jade Dragon said:
That has nothing to do with school dumbass. It's a pitiful attempt at an argument, and has nothing to do with school. Literally, and obviously nothing at all. Could you make a more stupid argument? You can protest whatever you want, but if it's not school related, and is personal, you can't expect shit.
Click to expand...

Hey einstein. Affirmative action is certainly school related. Blacks get passed no matter how poorly they do. Illegals are also school related since they are bankrupting our schools . THINK
 
Wow.

The anti-Choice people still refer to themselves as pro-Life?

Most of them could not care less about life...except when it is a zygote or fetus. I wonder why they prefer such an inappropriate designation.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Or pro-gun students? How about pro-merit students opposed to affirmative action? Or pro-american students opposed to illegal aliens?

Schools should not take sides on political issues or they're gonna have a mess on their hands.
Click to expand...

The school district where I live still claims the "protests" were not a school activity but a private one organized by students. Interesting thing is they took place at a location during a time that could only have been allowed by the schools. If the schools allowed it by those under their supervision, it was a public thing.

I would be interested to find out if students that wanted to do a private rally in support of the 2nd amendment would be given the same consideration.
 
Jade Dragon said:
That has nothing to do with school dumbass. It's a pitiful attempt at an argument, and has nothing to do with school. Literally, and obviously nothing at all. Could you make a more stupid argument? You can protest whatever you want, but if it's not school related, and is personal, you can't expect shit. You will be graded as if you're simply skipping. It's the same thing as workers stopping work, and protesting a dangerous work environment. Think before you vomit up opinions based on nothing, but angry biases. Why the hell are you upset that some children refuse to go to school in these dangerous conditions, and are trying to send the message out their for us all? It's abhorrent, Micro Peen.
Click to expand...

Would you support students having a 2nd amendment rally under the same conditions?
 
Frank Apisa said:
Wow.

The anti-Choice people still refer to themselves as pro-Life?

Most of them could not care less about life...except when it is a zygote or fetus. I wonder why they prefer such an inappropriate designation.
Click to expand...

Those claiming they're pro choice still deny they're pro abortion despite the choice they support being one directly related to abortion. Funny thing is when choice is mentioned on all sorts of other things, choice isn't given consideration.
 
tsuke said:
Its an optics thing. If whites do it then it gets sold as rally of white supremacy. If Asians do it then their whole narrative falls apart. Think White Hater!
Click to expand...

If blacks get hired where race is a consideration it's called affirmative action and accepted as OK by those that if race was used to deny would consider it wrong. I'm curious how using race in one manner is acceptable while using the SAME characteristic in the opposite manner is wrong.
 
CFM said:
Those claiming they're pro choice still deny they're pro abortion despite the choice they support being one directly related to abortion. Funny thing is when choice is mentioned on all sorts of other things, choice isn't given consideration.
Click to expand...

We support a woman right to choose what she will do with her own body. Now, call that whatever you like.
 
floridafan said:
We support a woman right to choose what she will do with her own body. Now, call that whatever you like.
Click to expand...

Why, when a woman makes a choice to have a child she can't afford, something YOU say is her choice alone, are those she told to butt out of her body expected to pay for it? There's a term for that.
 
CFM said:
Why, when a woman makes a choice to have a child she can't afford, something YOU say is her choice alone, are those she told to butt out of her body expected to pay for it? There's a term for that.
Click to expand...

I thought your kind was for smaller government, less intrusive government. A government free of interference. Guess we have been wrong.
 
floridafan said:
I thought your kind was for smaller government, less intrusive government. A government free of interference. Guess we have been wrong.
Click to expand...

I thought your side claimed to be about personal responsibility. It was a lie from the beginning.

Where did I interfere with her choice? I'm addressing the results not the choice. I expect the one making it, the one YOU say is the only one that should make it, to pay for the results. Why do you oppose that?

Isn't opposing the government forcing those you say don't have a say in the choice not funding the results considered smaller government?
 
CFM said:
I thought your side claimed to be about personal responsibility. It was a lie from the beginning.

Where did I interfere with her choice? I'm addressing the results not the choice. I expect the one making it, the one YOU say is the only one that should make it, to pay for the results. Why do you oppose that?

Isn't opposing the government forcing those you say don't have a say in the choice not funding the results considered smaller government?
Click to expand...

If a woman chooses to terminate her pregnancy, the government does not pay for it, Homer.
 
floridafan said:
If a woman chooses to terminate her pregnancy, the government does not pay for it, Homer.
Click to expand...

The government, through the taxpayers, do fund the social welfare programs that women CHOOSING to have children then can't afford use.

By the way, I didn't mention abortion. You did. Perhaps you ignored what I was addressing because you don't have a legitimate argument to defend taxpayers being forced to support the results of a choice you say they have no business in when the choice is made. If the woman that chooses to have the kid, and it's as much of a choice in the process as any other option, can't afford to support the results of it, let her and the results go without. She made it. Let her pay the price.
 
CFM said:
The government, through the taxpayers, do fund the social welfare programs that women CHOOSING to have children then can't afford use.

By the way, I didn't mention abortion. You did. Perhaps you ignored what I was addressing because you don't have a legitimate argument to defend taxpayers being forced to support the results of a choice you say they have no business in when the choice is made. If the woman that chooses to have the kid, and it's as much of a choice in the process as any other option, can't afford to support the results of it, let her and the results go without. She made it. Let her pay the price.
Click to expand...

You dont seem to have a problem with taxpayers being forced to pay for a tax cut which will cost them 1-2 trillion, or the millions upon millions that Trump cabinet pisses away just so they can live like a king, on you expense.
 
floridafan said:
You dont seem to have a problem with taxpayers being forced to pay for a tax cut which will cost them 1-2 trillion, or the millions upon millions that Trump cabinet pisses away just so they can live like a king, on you expense.
Click to expand...

Let's stay on topic. Can you legitimately defend taxpayers being forced to support a choice you say is none of their business when it's being made with a woman's body? That's the issue not some diversion because your superior showed fault in what you believe.
 
CFM said:
Let's stay on topic. Can you legitimately defend taxpayers being forced to support a choice you say is none of their business when it's being made with a woman's body? That's the issue not some diversion because your superior showed fault in what you believe.
Click to expand...

This is part of the topic Homer, deal with it. If you are worried about taxpayer spending then it should be on all spending. You dont pick and choose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top