ExpressLane
Verified User
YOU didn't mention them Dumbass Biden lover.They were mentioned in first page, dumbass.

YOU didn't mention them Dumbass Biden lover.They were mentioned in first page, dumbass.

Democrats have to pretend to ignore a lot of things.It is, however, clearly the correct word to describe someone ignoring what folks say on this board and pretending to ask for "evidence" for something they've personally seen on the site while pretending that they didn't. In fact, that is exactly the right word for it.
YOU didn't mention them Dumbass Biden lover.![]()

Now before our resident NRA flunkies have individual orgasms and go circle jerk about this, they need to ask themselves the following:
1. If the 1994 AWB was still in effect and the perp Butler would not have that AR-15, would he have acted as he did?
2. Do you REALLY know the reality of how the "good guy with a gun" scenario plays out in real life? Buffalo, NY recently tells one tale, but this has been studied for years now
https://www.thetrace.org/2022/06/defensive-gun-use-data-good-guys-with-guns/
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-study-2000-2013-1.pdf/view
So if you're a law abiding citizen who is LICENSED by your state for CCW, fine. If you prevent a crime, excellent. Just don't let this happen to you:
https://www.bet.com/article/eokrmr/black-man-kaun-green-disarm-shooter-shot-by-police
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Now before our resident NRA flunkies have individual orgasms and go circle jerk about this, they need to ask themselves the following:
1. If the 1994 AWB was still in effect and the perp Butler would not have that AR-15, would he have acted as he did?
2. Do you REALLY know the reality of how the "good guy with a gun" scenario plays out in real life? Buffalo, NY recently tells one tale, but this has been studied for years now
https://www.thetrace.org/2022/06/def...uys-with-guns/
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/...013-1.pdf/view
So if you're a law abiding citizen who is LICENSED by your state for CCW, fine. If you prevent a crime, excellent. Just don't let this happen to you:
https://www.bet.com/article/eokrmr/b...shot-by-police
Handguns were used twice as much in mass shootings u stupid slut
Weapon types used in mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and June 2022, by number of weapons and incidents
https://www.statista.com/statistics/476409/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-weapon-types-used/
Forget the “good guy with a gun” bullshit, it ain’t real
In related news, nobody showed up and shot at dozens of people at an event in any other major wealthy nation.
Retarded question for a retarded person. It fits you perfectlyI don't have to because smart people can infer what I am referring to. You're the dumbass who asked me if I thought that woman was not a person.
That is one of the most retarded questions I have seen. You won the award today.
liar.....I haven't seen it.
Retarded question for a retarded person. It fits you perfectly![]()
Sorry but you win the award for one of the most retarded questions ever.
Accept the award.
Notice, dear reader, that this lower than whale shit sheet wearer AVOIDED each and every point I previously made, and ran like a little whiny bitch straight to a NRA talking point.
This is from his linked source: While any definition of assault weapon is contentious, semi-automatic rifles are generally the main focus of debates around this issue. Since 1985 there has been a known total 50 mass shootings involving rifles, mostly semi-automatics. This figure is underreported though, as it excludes the multiple semi-automatic (and fully automatic) rifles used in the 2017 Las Vegas Strip massacre – the worst mass shooting in U.S. history, killing 58 and wounding 546. In fact, semi-automatic rifles were featured in four of the five deadliest mass shootings, being used in the Orlando nightclub massacre, Sandy Hook Elementary massacre and Texas First Baptist Church massacre.
Now, if we want to play the stat game, mass shootings had to use on the whole more than one handgun to achieve their kill rate (victim numbers not given) ..... not so
with assault rifles. You might want to shut your widdle eyes from this, my little Davey Duke wanna be: https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
Now anyone with an 1/8 of a brain would condone reinstating the 1994 AWB, because closer that would mean LESS mass shootings and victims....and the victims families would have no problem with that...along with a state/national licensing and registry of all weapons like we do cars.
Only a true stupid slut would argue otherwise.
I'm crushedOne of the reasons why I have the little chicken shit on "ignore" for a month or so. >pew, pew, pew<![]()

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Notice, dear reader, that this lower than whale shit sheet wearer AVOIDED each and every point I previously made, and ran like a little whiny bitch straight to a NRA talking point.
This is from his linked source: While any definition of assault weapon is contentious, semi-automatic rifles are generally the main focus of debates around this issue. Since 1985 there has been a known total 50 mass shootings involving rifles, mostly semi-automatics. This figure is underreported though, as it excludes the multiple semi-automatic (and fully automatic) rifles used in the 2017 Las Vegas Strip massacre – the worst mass shooting in U.S. history, killing 58 and wounding 546. In fact, semi-automatic rifles were featured in four of the five deadliest mass shootings, being used in the Orlando nightclub massacre, Sandy Hook Elementary massacre and Texas First Baptist Church massacre.
Now, if we want to play the stat game, mass shootings had to use on the whole more than one handgun to achieve their kill rate (victim numbers not given) ..... not so
with assault rifles. You might want to shut your widdle eyes from this, my little Davey Duke wanna be: https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
Now anyone with an 1/8 of a brain would condone reinstating the 1994 AWB, because closer that would mean LESS mass shootings and victims....and the victims families would have no problem with that...along with a state/national licensing and registry of all weapons like we do cars.
Only a true stupid slut would argue otherwise.
Woman with Pistol Stops Man Firing at Graduation Party Crowd with AR-15
An u cant stand that fact!
I already addressed those FACTS, you sheet wearing simpleton. If you had a better comprehension of what you read, you would've noticed that I stated having NO PROBLEM with law abiding citizens with CCW licenses preventing crimes. I just stopped you from using this to promote the LaPierre propaganda to rescind all gun control laws stated & federal.
To date, you don't DARE take on those points as the chronology of the posts shows. That's why you put your foot in your mouth (or in your case, under the hood) when you lie about what I write. Carry on.
You need to find a more credible source than Brietbart.![]()
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I already addressed those FACTS, you sheet wearing simpleton. If you had a better comprehension of what you read, you would've noticed that I stated having NO PROBLEM with law abiding citizens with CCW licenses preventing crimes. I just stopped you from using this to promote the LaPierre propaganda to rescind all gun control laws stated & federal.
To date, you don't DARE take on those points as the chronology of the posts shows. That's why you put your foot in your mouth (or in your case, under the hood) when you lie about what I write. Carry on.
Fact is u stupid fucking commie POS
A CCW NRA pistol packing good person...stopped a mass shooting
Not the police, not any gun law
My, you're just full of NRA lies and BS, ain't ya toodles.
Inferring that any gun control advocacy equates with the likes of Communist China or the old Soviet Union.
But since in the last 30 years I have NOT seen any gun control law or proposed law in the USA that confiscates gun ownership by law abiding citizens, your inference is tantamount to a lie. Coming from your pointy hooded brain, that's not surprising.
Now pay attention toodles, because this is the THIRD (3rd) time I'm saying this: I have no problem with a law abiding citizen who's licensed for CCW in their state acting accordingly and then stopping a violent crime.
Capice?
Now STFU, GTFU and respond to the points I previously made (See Post #47). If you can't or won't, then you're just another 3rd rate Davey Duke wanna be with delusions of intelligence, and I already got your number in the previous response. Carry on.