Woman seeks $62,814 from ex-fiance

Damocles said:
Actually "we" are talking about both. There are two issues, the legal issue where she spent money according to his assurance of fidelity and marriage, and the moral issue where the man knows he played this girl to the tune of 30K or so.

She isn't entitled to "pain and suffering" the law in California that Yurt is citing is clear on that, however monetary obligations are different, even more so if they were cohabiting. The reality is she had a reasonable assurance and verbal agreement, even sealed with what is legally called a "conditional gift", that he would then be faithful and fulfill the obligation that he took upon himself by first asking for her agreement, and then by gifting her with a symbol of the agreement.

He then, after she spent a small fortune, decided that his obligations meant nothing. That's fine, but married or not you are going to have to pay your share.
Click to expand...

This case is not being tried in CA, but in IL...isn't it? Also, there is a very similar case being tried as well and that one has not been settled yet. Also a woman in Georgia won 150k in 2008.
 
Yurt said:
yes, you obviously don't know what an analogy is. :rolleyes:

maybe i should simplify things for you:

he got drunk, got a dui, spent the night in the drunk tank, missed his flight

happy now :fu:
Click to expand...

Which has nothing to do, with your attempt to suggest that the intended groom slept with another women; because it was an accident and he slipped into it.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Which has nothing to do, with your attempt to suggest that the intended groom slept with another women; because it was an accident and he slipped into it.
Click to expand...

i never suggested that. good lord. like i said, you have no clue what an analogy is.

anal·o·gy noun \ə-ˈna-lə-jē\
plural anal·o·gies
Definition of ANALOGY
1: inference that if two or more things agree with one another in some respects they will probably agree in others
2a : resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike : similarity b : comparison based on such resemblance
Click to expand...

:palm:
 
WinterBorn said:
If they were planning a wedding, he should pay for half of the expenses incurred, especially if he cheated on her causing the loss of monies spent.

This is not about revenge. Its about the man paying what he owes for the his wedding.
Click to expand...


WHo's breaking off the wedding plans? You're insane. This is an insane precedent to set. You don't think good, do you?
 
Sounds legit to me. WTF would you ask someone to marry you if you're going to be a cheating h ore anyway?
 
cawacko said:
I would probably assume to that hooking up meets sleeping with someone but that isn't always the case. He could have been at a Vegas night club and hooked up with a girl on the dance floor.
Click to expand...

Which has nothing at all to do with the FACT that he's fucking someone else, when a wedding has already been in the plans.
 
Yurt said:
i never suggested that. good lord. like i said, you have no clue what an analogy is.



:palm:
Click to expand...

But I do l know what an analogy is and your attempt was not one.
Me referencing your behavior as being Emo, is an analogy.

IE: Yurt is going all Emo again.


Major fail, on your part.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top