Woman executed in Virginia even though she didn't do the killing

cancel2 2022

Canceled

It is cases like this that dismay foreign observers of the US justice system, how is it conceivable that she is executed whilst the contract kilers were not?

A Virginia grandmother has been put to death for plotting the murders of her husband and stepson - the first woman to be executed in the US for five years.
Related photos / videos








Teresa Lewis was given a lethal injection at 2am BST at the Greensville Correctional Centre in southern Virginia while supporters and relatives of the victims watched. Just outside the prison, a group opposed to the death penalty rang a bell and prayed as Lewis went to her death.

She is the first woman in almost 100 years to be executed in Virginia. More than 7,300 appeals to stop the execution had been made to Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell but he refused to intervene in the case. The US Supreme Court had already rejected her request for a stay of execution.

Sky News' US correspondent Greg Milam has been outside the Greensville Correctional Centre in southern Virginia.

He said: "We have heard from some of the witnesses, four official witnesses who were inside that chamber describing the look of fear, the look of terror on the face of Teresa Lewis as she was taken into that execution chamber.

"Her lawyer gave a very emotional speech after the execution in which he said he hoped what had happened here would make America look again at a badly broken system that put someone to death when there are such questions about their mental capacity."

Lewis pleaded guilty to hiring two men to murder her husband and stepson at the family's home in October 2002 so that she could collect £200,000 in life insurance.

But campaigners had argued that she was "borderline mentally retarded" and that assessments of her IQ as being between 70 and 72 made the execution unconstitutional.

Lewis admitted she left the door of the family trailer open in 2002 so the two could enter and shoot her husband and his 25-year-old son.

All three pleaded guilty but Shallenberger and Fuller were sentenced to life while Lewis received the death penalty as the mastermind of the killings.

But her supporters argued that she had a personality disorder, was addicted to prescription drugs and was manipulated by the more intelligent Shallenberger.

And they questioned why she should be executed when the two men who actually carried out the murder were handed life without parole.

Her lawyers had pointed to a letter from Shallenberger, who killed himself in jail in 2006, in which he claimed full responsibility for the murder plot and suggested he pushed Lewis into it.
 
Last edited:
I'm not an advocate for the death penalty but it's very hard to feel sympathy for this person. Oh well, at least we won't have to worry about her hiring any more killers.

There was similar outrage about the Karla Faye Tucker execution 12 years ago. I was sympathetic towards her until I read the account of the brutal fashion she pick axed her drug dealer and an innocent woman to death and how she bragged about how she had orgasms when when she swung the pick ax into their bodies. I kinda lost sympathy for her there.
 
Way To Go Virginia!

I can hardly wait till California starts up again.




LOS ANGELES — Anti-death penalty campaigners slammed Tuesday a judge's decision to overturn a ban on execution in California, a step towards resuming the practice suspended for over four years here.

The ruling Monday opens the way for the execution as early as next week of Albert Greenwood Brown, scheduled to die on September 29 for abducting and raping a 15-year-old schoolgirl in 1980.

Brown is among some 700 people scheduled to be executed in California, which has the biggest number of prisoners on death row in the United States -- and where executions were suspended in 2006.
 
Way To Go Virginia!

I can hardly wait till California starts up again.




LOS ANGELES — Anti-death penalty campaigners slammed Tuesday a judge's decision to overturn a ban on execution in California, a step towards resuming the practice suspended for over four years here.

The ruling Monday opens the way for the execution as early as next week of Albert Greenwood Brown, scheduled to die on September 29 for abducting and raping a 15-year-old schoolgirl in 1980.

Brown is among some 700 people scheduled to be executed in California, which has the biggest number of prisoners on death row in the United States -- and where executions were suspended in 2006.
You are insane,being happy about the death penalty, thank you American Taliban!
 
As long as we are still releasing people from prison because they were wrongfully convicted, I disagree with the death penalty.

But I do agree with executing women just like we execute men. The fact that this was a female is what made the news more than any questions over her guilt.
 
As long as we are still releasing people from prison because they were wrongfully convicted, I disagree with the death penalty.

But I do agree with executing women just like we execute men. The fact that this was a female is what made the news more than any questions over her guilt.
I know, it is sad, but what do we have over the Taliban, Europe is asking, when we still use the death penalty on either!

We seem more barbarous than our counterparts.
 
I cannot fathom how anyone can believe in the death penalty. It's just such an evil, disgusting thing. The issue is simple. The death penalty is wrong, and if you don't agree, go fuck yourself.
 
I'm not an advocate for the death penalty but it's very hard to feel sympathy for this person. Oh well, at least we won't have to worry about her hiring any more killers.

There was similar outrage about the Karla Faye Tucker execution 12 years ago. I was sympathetic towards her until I read the account of the brutal fashion she pick axed her drug dealer and an innocent woman to death and how she bragged about how she had orgasms when when she swung the pick ax into their bodies. I kinda lost sympathy for her there.

Would it have been better if she had just done it out of her own free will, instead of through having a strong involuntary compulsion to bash axes into peoples heads? It's pretty obviously the result of a mental disorder. A lot of bizarrely violent crimes are actually caused by the sexual reward and violence signals getting mixed up in the brain.

If I took a kid a kid and rewired their brain to give them a compulsion to do violence to others, and they grew up to be a serial killer, who would be responsible for the deaths? But when nature produces a similarly flawed person just through random coincidences, we have to kill them?

The capability for good exists in everyone. Even if we don't know how to fix these people now, we may figure out in the future, and that's why I believe we should keep them alive, even if innocence weren't a factor (which it always is).
 
I'm not an advocate for the death penalty but it's very hard to feel sympathy for this person. Oh well, at least we won't have to worry about her hiring any more killers.

There was similar outrage about the Karla Faye Tucker execution 12 years ago. I was sympathetic towards her until I read the account of the brutal fashion she pick axed her drug dealer and an innocent woman to death and how she bragged about how she had orgasms when when she swung the pick ax into their bodies. I kinda lost sympathy for her there.

I am not even disputing the rights and wrongs of capital punishment here, I just can't understand how the actual killers got life whilst she was executed. I just have a real problem understanding the logic behind it, assuming there is any of course.
 
I am not even disputing the rights and wrongs of capital punishment here, I just can't understand how the actual killers got life whilst she was executed. I just have a real problem understanding the logic behind it, assuming there is any of course.

It’s likely because conspiracy to commit capital murder is a more heinous crime; a crime without corroboration that is difficult to prove. The hired killers likely made a deal to testify against her so that they could convict her.
 
1. your thread title is a lie

Her lawyers had pointed to a letter from Shallenberger, who killed himself in jail in 2006, in which he claimed full responsibility for the murder plot and suggested he pushed Lewis into it.

he doesn't say she didn't do it, he says he pushed her into it...that does not make her innocent

2. there is a scotus case that makes it unconstitutional to apply the death penalty to the mentally retarded...i forget the case name but it came out about 7 years ago...
 
This asshole slutted herself to convince two men to kill her husband and son to collect the son's military life insurance policy. One of the perps committed suicide and the other is in prison for the rest of his life.
 
It’s likely because conspiracy to commit capital murder is a more heinous crime; a crime without corroboration that is difficult to prove. The hired killers likely made a deal to testify against her so that they could convict her.

That makes sense to you? Of course they made a deal, but where is the justice in that?
 
It’s likely because conspiracy to commit capital murder is a more heinous crime; a crime without corroboration that is difficult to prove. The hired killers likely made a deal to testify against her so that they could convict her.

yep

to say she didn't do it is a total lie

tom's logic is:

if i pay you to kill someone, i didn't kill them, you did

:palm:
 
yep

to say she didn't do it is a total lie

tom's logic is:

if i pay you to kill someone, i didn't kill them, you did

:palm:

My logic, which I've already explained, is how do the actual killers end up with life whilst the instigator is executed. I guess only an American lawyer can understand that.
:palm:
 
Back
Top