Witnesses in Zimmerman/Martin case change testimonies.

Bijou said:
Lighten up, jesus fucking christ....
Click to expand...

LIGHTEN UP!!
LIGHTEN UP!!

The left and you are presenting lies, regarding this incident, all you want is vengence, because you're not interested in justice, and you want someone to serve time, just because you FEEL that he's guilty.
And you want someone to lighten up.
You're an idot.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
LIGHTEN UP!!
LIGHTEN UP!!

The left and you are presenting lies, regarding this incident, all you want is vengence, because you're not interested in justice, and you want someone to serve time, just because you FEEL that he's guilty.
And you want someone to lighten up.
You're an idot.
Click to expand...


Ooooh. Caps lock! Now I'm intimidated.... :D
 
Bijou said:
Your assertions hinge on a lot of mind-reading on your part. :D
Click to expand...

Your mind and mindset is an open book, that you have presented to be reviewed.
You've already admitted that you'll only feel that justice has been served, is if he's sentenced to 12 years or so.
And you also said that he's a dead man, while free.
Talk about someone filling the description of a vigilante.
You sure to seem to fill the bill.
Have you already cut the eye holes, in your flour bag disquise?
 
bijou i don't get your point. it's quite clear that trayvon was causing great bodily harm to zimmerman, had him on the ground and beating the shit out of him, for "following" him (at worst). If I am following someone and they attack me I will gladly shoot them in the face and sleep soundly the next night.

It's also very likely that trayvon was the first one to commit a crime. Following is not a crime, beating somebody up is. We have actual evidence that trayvon had zimmerman on his back, vulnerable, and was pummeling him. All we have against zimmerman is that he was doing an activity that is not a crime. (following somebody, for a particular duration that is still undefined)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Your mind and mindset is an open book, that you have presented to be reviewed.
You've already admitted that you'll only feel that justice has been served, is if he's sentenced to 12 years or so.
And you also said that he's a dead man, while free.
Talk about someone filling the description of a vigilante.
You sure to seem to fill the bill.
Have you already cut the eye holes, in your flour bag disquise?
Click to expand...

Somebody give this guy some anti-anxiety meds, please. He's unspooling.
 
KingofOwls said:
they dont' care.

a lot of evidence already exists that trayvon was beating the shit out of zimmerman.

for many people here, the very mere act of following trayvon, (even if he actually did stop when the dispatcher told him to) gives license for trayvon to start curb stomping zimmerman. there is literally no scenario that the anti-zimmermans will accept for him to be able to use his weapon.
Click to expand...

Unfortunetly I have to agree with you.
It's unfortunet; because this country and a system of Innocent Until Proved Guilty and the liberals want to subvert it, when it fits their agendas
One only had to look at the comments concerning the Rugby team that was accused of rape; because there is no way that a black women would ever do such a thing and after all, the team was white and privliged.
 
KingofOwls said:
bijou i don't get your point. it's quite clear that trayvon was causing great bodily harm to zimmerman, had him on the ground and beating the shit out of him, for "following" him (at worst). If I am following someone and they attack me I will gladly shoot them in the face and sleep soundly the next night.

It's also very likely that trayvon was the first one to commit a crime. Following is not a crime, beating somebody up is. We have actual evidence that trayvon had zimmerman on his back, vulnerable, and was pummeling him. All we have against zimmerman is that he was doing an activity that is not a crime. (following somebody, for a particular duration that is still undefined)
Click to expand...

No. What we have is that Zimmerman watched, followed and ultimately shot and killed Trayvon Martin, who may or may not have initiated physical contact, which may or may not have been initiated by an assault by Zimmerman. You need to have an understanding of what constitutes assault, because it is key in determining who gets to claim 'self-defense' in this scenario. Unfortunately, the witness testimonies are questionable because some are changing their stories.
 
Bijou said:
That's correct, because Zimmerman should've allowed the police to handle it. He ignored the dispatcher's advice. The shooting was completely avoidable and all necessary elements - police were advised and were being dispatched to the scene - to avoid it were being implemented. Except that Zimmerman just couldn't leave it alone. Yes, this is all speculative. Had Zimmerman turned around and gone home after calling the cops to the scene, it can be SPECULATED that the shooting would've never happened.

That isn't an 'Anti-Zimmerman' point of view. It's a sound assessment of what probably happened, and what could've been avoided.
Click to expand...

Gee, that sure didn't last very long; did it?

Bijou said:
The dispatcher asking Zimmerman not to follow: recorded:D
Click to expand...
At 11:17

Bijou said:
I couldn't find any evidence for this, either. However, Martin's girlfriend claims that Martin was uneasy about being 'followed'.
Click to expand...
At 11:41

Bijou said:
He ignored the dispatcher's advice.
Click to expand...

Enjoy the convoluted world, that you've created for yourself.
 
Bijou said:
You can speculate, and so can I. It is reasonable to SPECULATE that had Zimmerman taken the advice and gone home, the shooting would've never happened.
Click to expand...

No it's not reasonable; because the recording has Zimmerman agreeing with the dispatcher and then he begins to discuss where the Police can meet him.
There is nothing in the conversation that would sugget that Zimmerman was still looking for Martin; except for what your psychic powers have discovered.

But using your "thinking and reasoning", it is also reasonable to SPECULATE that had Zimmerman not been acting like a thug and gone home, then the shooting would never have happened.
 
KingofOwls said:
there is more evidence to suggest that martin was the violent instigator, as opposed to zimmerman. zimmerman is also the one on trial right now, so naturally the question of innocent until proven guilty, and asking for evidence rather than conjecture is relevant.
Click to expand...

Yeah well kinda hard to try a dead man or for him to speak in his defense.
 
man I feel so victorious in every zimmerman thread. this is literally the easiest thing to debate on. the other side only has conjecture and that's not going to hold up in court. nor should it.
 
KingofOwls said:
man I feel so victorious in every zimmerman thread. this is literally the easiest thing to debate on. the other side only has conjecture and that's not going to hold up in court. nor should it.
Click to expand...

you are entitled to your feelings, but no your own facts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top