witnesses are now allowed to speak

evince

evince

Truthmatters
the investigation is over


they can tell us what they saw


you might as well release the whole thing
 
https://www.pcmag.com/news/358791/report-dutch-spies-watched-russians-hack-the-dnc



Report: Dutch Spies Watched Russians Hack the DNC
The Dutch security service known as the AIVD reportedly spied on the Russian hacking team Cozy Bear as it breached the Democratic National Committee.

By
Michael Kan
January 26, 2018 1:45PM EST






"Not only can the intelligence service now see what the Russians are doing, they can also see who's doing it. Pictures are taken of every visitor," the report said.
From those pictures, Dutch intelligence deduced that a Russian intelligence agency known as the SVR actually leads Cozy Bear.
 
why are you lying about it when I already told you what he did in another thread?


because you are a russo bot hole
 
wrong thread asshole

This is about witnesses being able to now speak about what they saw Trumpies do
 
Superfreak said:
So Obama knew in 2014 and did nothing for 2 years to stop his Russian masters. That must be the flexibility he wanted to give to Putin.
Click to expand...

Obama wanted to go public in the summer of 2016 and tell the American people Russia was meddling in the election.

Someone threatened Obama with partisanship if he did that.

That same someone who took over $2M for his PACs from Russian-linked oligarchs.

That someone is Mitch McConnell
 
the republicans cant stop the witnesses from talking about a "closed" case


they can not hide this report
 
President Trump can claim exoneration all he wants, but if we are not allowed to see the Mueller Report his words will fall on deaf ears. Only his previous supporters will believe him when he claims exoneration, even as both Mueller and Barr said this does not exonerate the President.

Everyone else besides his fans will not be convinced.
 
PoliTalker said:
President Trump can claim exoneration all he wants, but if we are not allowed to see the Mueller Report his words will fall on deaf ears. Only his previous supporters will believe him when he claims exoneration, even as both Mueller and Barr said this does not exonerate the President.

Everyone else besides his fans will not be convinced.
Click to expand...
What an ignorant post.


Status of the Department's Review

The relevant regulations contemplate that the Special Counsel's report will be a "confidential report" to the Attorney General. See Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. Reg. 37,038, 37,040-41 (July 9, 1999). As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter. For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel's report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6( e ), which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to "matter[ s] occurring before [a] grand jury." Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6( e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function.

Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6( e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6( e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

As I observed in my initial notification, the Special Counsel regulations provide that "the Attorney General may determine that public release of' notifications to your respective Committees "would be in the public interest." 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(c). I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you.

Sincerely,
William P. Barr Attorney General"

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/de...Committees.pdf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top