Wisconsin to decertify 2020 election

Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO. First of all they can't decertify the election.
Click to expand...
Sure they can.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Any attempt to do so would lose in court so fast,
Click to expand...
No court has jurisdiction.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
their heads would spin right off. Any voter would have standing to sue them and demand they present their evidence to an actual court.
Click to expand...
No court has jurisdiction.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Then we would see how fast the lawyers run away so they don't get disbarred.

Since voting registrations are public, feel free to point out where those 10,000 voter registrations are that are all at the same address.
Click to expand...

RQAA.
 
Once more for the cheap seats:

Didn't the country witness various attempts by MAGA minions across the country to do the same thing? Didn't they hire "independent" companies to "investigate" or "recount" with the blessing of a Red state/conservative governor or conservative mayor?

And didn't they ALL come up with NOTHING that disproved the valid election of Biden? Even Dump's "people" concluded there was no ballot cheating. Even A.G. Barr concluded such.

Funny how these minions all accept without question the elections of Senators and congressmen BY THE VERY SAME SYSTEM THEY CLAIM IS CORRUPT WHEN ELECTING BIDEN.

Can you say, "they're either stupid or just full of it" boys and girls?

Seems the ONLY people who are benefitting from this are the "independent" organizations hired to beat this dead horse. P.T. Barnum must be laughing his butt off in heaven, saying "See? I told ya so!"


P.s. - the subject title is purposely incorrect...the author living up to his screen name.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I did google WI court finds election unconstitutional. No actual ruling making that claim came up.

The OP does not link to any court case. It's a video that says an investigator calls for decertification. As a lawyer, do you not know the difference between an investigator and a court? Just because the investigator used to be a judge doesn't make his private findings when not a judge a court ruling.

So let me ask you again. Where is your evidence of an actual court ruling that the 2020 election in Wisconsin was unconstitutional?
Click to expand...

look at post #126, you fucking idiot.....
 
Joe Capitalist said:
PostMortemPolyp is just a whiny sore loser. Can you imagine making a bet with him on a football game? If he lost, need never pay up, whining and complaining that the refs made bad calls and rigged the game.

Some people are just too immature to handle losing. You know how some toddlers whine, kick and scream when they lose a game?
Well, that's PostMortemPolyp all over. Fully immersed in delusions.
Click to expand...

we both know if you cunts had lost in an unconstitutional election you would be bleeding tears nonstop and demanding a third or fourth impeachment......
 
Taichiliberal said:
Once more for the cheap seats:

Didn't the country witness various attempts by MAGA minions across the country to do the same thing? Didn't they hire "independent" companies to "investigate" or "recount" with the blessing of a Red state/conservative governor or conservative mayor?

And didn't they ALL come up with NOTHING that disproved the valid election of Biden? Even Dump's "people" concluded there was no ballot cheating. Even A.G. Barr concluded such.

Funny how these minions all accept without question the elections of Senators and congressmen BY THE VERY SAME SYSTEM THEY CLAIM IS CORRUPT WHEN ELECTING BIDEN.

Can you say, "they're either stupid or just full of it" boys and girls?

Seems the ONLY people who are benefitting from this are the "independent" organizations hired to beat this dead horse. P.T. Barnum must be laughing his butt off in heaven, saying "See? I told ya so!"


P.s. - the subject title is purposely incorrect...the author living up to his screen name.
Click to expand...

They did not get possession of the ballots and vet them as was done in WI.

All the ballot harvested votes will be discounted because the practice is and was illegal in Wisconsin.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I linked it for the third time in post #126 because you feeble minded cunts didn't bother reading it the first two times......
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO. From you link:
Ruling from the bench Thursday, Circuit Court Judge Michael Bohren ordered the Wisconsin Elections Commission to rescind its guidance to clerks on how to use the drop boxes, saying the WEC had exceeded its authority when it issued the recommendations.
Click to expand...

This is what you said:
PostmodernProphet said:
you should look at the evidence submitted in the WI case where the court decided that the 2020 election was unconstitutional....
Click to expand...

Your link doesn't have anything about a court ruling that the 2020 election was unconstitutional. Do you not know the difference between 2022 and 2020? Do you not know the difference between something violating state law versus being unconstitutional?

But it seems you have failed to follow what is actually happening in the case
https://will-law.org/teigen-v-wisconsin-elections-commission/

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay on January 24, 2022 that is in effect through the February 15 primary election.

WILL filed an emergency motion to bypass and emergency motion to vacate the stay to the Wisconsin Supreme Court on January 26. The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed to hear the case on January 28, but left in place the stay issued by the Court of Appeals.
Click to expand...

Not only has the case not yet been decided on appeal, the case has nothing to do with changing the 2020 election or with whether the boxes were unconstitutional.


Let me ask again. Where is the court ruling that supports this statement by you?
PostmodernProphet said:
you should look at the evidence submitted in the WI case where the court decided that the 2020 election was unconstitutional....
Click to expand...
The evidence you claimed to have provided in no way supports your claim. Are you feeble minded or just willing to lie about how the court actually ruled?

The court ruling can be found here:

https://will-law.org/wp-content/upl...ting-Pls-Summary-Judgment-signed-1-19-221.pdf
The court says:
the
Court hereby declares that WEC’s interpretation of state statutes in the Memos is inconsistent with
state law,
Click to expand...
The word "constitution" is not mentioned even once in the ruling.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Once more for the cheap seats:

Didn't the country witness various attempts by MAGA minions across the country to do the same thing? Didn't they hire "independent" companies to "investigate" or "recount" with the blessing of a Red state/conservative governor or conservative mayor?

And didn't they ALL come up with NOTHING that disproved the valid election of Biden? Even Dump's "people" concluded there was no ballot cheating. Even A.G. Barr concluded such.

Funny how these minions all accept without question the elections of Senators and congressmen BY THE VERY SAME SYSTEM THEY CLAIM IS CORRUPT WHEN ELECTING BIDEN.

Can you say, "they're either stupid or just full of it" boys and girls?

Seems the ONLY people who are benefitting from this are the "independent" organizations hired to beat this dead horse. P.T. Barnum must be laughing his butt off in heaven, saying "See? I told ya so!"


P.s. - the subject title is purposely incorrect...the author living up to his screen name.
Click to expand...

Funny how you deny history.
Nah. Maybe it's not.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
look at post #126, you fucking idiot.....
Click to expand...

Poor Richard Saunders regularly does this. He asks the same question over and over mindlessly even though it's already been answered.
This kind of thing is so common among Democrats that I just use the abbreviation RQAA (Repetitive Question Already Answered).
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO. From you link:


This is what you said:


Your link doesn't have anything about a court ruling that the 2020 election was unconstitutional. Do you not know the difference between 2022 and 2020? Do you not know the difference between something violating state law versus being unconstitutional?

But it seems you have failed to follow what is actually happening in the case
https://will-law.org/teigen-v-wisconsin-elections-commission/



Not only has the case not yet been decided on appeal, the case has nothing to do with changing the 2020 election or with whether the boxes were unconstitutional.


Let me ask again. Where is the court ruling that supports this statement by you?

The evidence you claimed to have provided in no way supports your claim. Are you feeble minded or just willing to lie about how the court actually ruled?

The court ruling can be found here:

https://will-law.org/wp-content/upl...ting-Pls-Summary-Judgment-signed-1-19-221.pdf
The court says:

The word "constitution" is not mentioned even once in the ruling.
Click to expand...

See Article III of the Constitution of the State of Wisconsin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top