RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.
Wisconsin Supreme Court hands Democrats huge win with ballot box decision
- Thread starter ziggy
- Start date
DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR INABILITY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND ENGLISH ON ME OR ANYONE ELSE, VOID.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Regarding the "Go learn English" quip ... it's "Who'd have thought that ..."
ZenMode
Well-known member
Probably for the same reason no one in a position of power has ever officially refuted the claims about Area 51 or officially refuted the claims of that crazy old man on AM radio, in the middle of the night, who believes aliens live among us. Refuting them gives their "crazy" legitimacy.
ZenMode
Well-known member
I'm still waiting for the numbers, crazy guy. Which state? What's the total count?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. It is not probably for the same reason; it is definitely for a different reason.
The intelligence community will neither confirm nor deny any of its "areas," regardless of the extent of public awareness, whereas leftists are simply unable to refute eyewitness testimony of events that actually happened for which there is mountainous corroborating evidence.
ZenMode
Well-known member
As I've said before, it doesn't matter if you refute a conspiracy theorist. They're still going to believe whatever they want to believe. You could offer free tours of A51, to allow the conspiracy theorists to see, first hand, that there are no alien bodies and they still wouldn't be convinced... because they're conspiracy theorists and there's always one more step down the rabbit hole.
You've proved me right that with the magical suitcase of Biden ballots in Georgia. It was THOROUGHLY investigated, with nothing being found, but you still have that one more step - EVERYONE involved in the investigation, Republican, Democrat or neutral, are all in on the steal, so their investigation means nothing.
RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.
DON'T TRY TO EVADE, FUCKER.
The Democrat party is a conspiracy, Void. It's no theory.
DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.
ZenMode
Well-known member
You've never given details because you have none. That's why I keep asking.
I'm suuuuure you'll eventually provide them.
ZenMode
Well-known member
There's nothing to deny. Again, that why I keep asking.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
... because you refuse to believe that humans conspire.
You're still going to believe whatever you desperately want to believe.
Nope. You cannot offer free tours, that's the reason for the rumors. The shroud of secrecy leaves only the imagination to have a say.
Incorrect. Converting someone into eyewitness that sees that there are no aliens will create an eyewitness and lose a hoax-driver.
What's wrong with recognizing that humans conspire? I recognize that humans conspire. I think that the problem is on your end, in your denial that humans conspire.
This has no meaning. You wasted some fine bandwidth here.
ZenMode
Well-known member
and there's always one more step down the rabbit hole.
"This has no meaning. You wasted some fine bandwidth here."
This has all the meaning for conspiracy theorists because there is no convincing them. There's always the next conspiracy to explain away any explanation. The Georgia example epitomizes that fact, you just don't want to admit it.
Area 51 is a military facility. Nobody, except those who are authorized, can go there but IF they offered every conspiracy theorist the opportunity to scour the facility for as long as they'd like, looking behind every door, in every drawer, etc it wouldn't matter that no alien bodies were found because it would be explained away by the next conspiracy. "Oh, they hid them in a secret spot" or "They were moved to another location".
IBDaMann
Well-known member
’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
I don't believe your comment holds any meaning for people who recognize that humans conspire.
Area 51 is a tenant on an Air Force installation. Area 51 itself is not military.
Correct.
Yes, it would matter.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
/whispers "unconstitutional"........hears ZM cringe......
ZenMode
Well-known member
You seem to confuse "humans conspire" with "humans conspiring is the default explanation".
I don't believe you re: Area 51. I've seen your conspiratorial mind on display here for months.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Incorrect. You are intentionally misrepresenting my position. I have clarified many times that "humans conspiring" should be the initial assumption, with all other information and other explanations considered. Human nature should always be the initial assumption. Unfortunately, denial of human nature and denial that humans conspire is the exclusive axiom of leftists who will immediately dismiss correct explanations as "conspiracy theories."
This is why leftists who use the term "conspiracy theory" are, at most, one turn away from tipping their king and having their argument summarily dismissed.
Of course you don't. You are obligated to deny human nature. Let's review. You believe that if a human were allowed to examine Area 51 for aliens to his satisfaction, that he would not be satisfied.
Do you see the problem with your position?
RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.
RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD.