will violent images exact a poltical poll now?

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I though you were supposed to link quotes.

cheney is evil distilled. 'Nuff said.

Really? Cheney is "evil distilled?" Now, what if some mentally unstable person were to read that, and think to himself, I need to do something about this distilled evil which exists... and I know what to do! I'll get a gun and go shoot his evil ass! Then, instead of being a pathetic low-life nobody, I will be a hero to the left, for killing this evil terrible person!

Of course, something like that could never happen in the real world, because psychotic nut jobs know full well that lefty liberals just spew shit like this and don't really mean anything by it! It's when the right use images with crosshairs and targets, or talk about "re-loading" (with information) to continue the debate... those things are what set psychos off, not anything the left would ever say!

Isn't that right, Christie?

 

[evince]

Yes cheney id evil disstilled.

Now realoize the part yurt left out of my comments on chenneys death. I clearly stated AT THE END OF HIS NATURAL LIFE I woudld lift a glass.


I never called for his life to be shortened or talked of any second amemedment solution to his evil.


This is what some people do.

They try very hard NOT to understand what someone is saying.

They cant face the results of a real discussion of the issues so they create a whole new side show by pretending something else was said.


What we have is an entire faction of americans who use this method to distroy any possibility of this country coming together and solving our problems.


The really great thing is they have lost this discussion not in words but in the image market.

These images will no longer have the same possitive effect on enough voters fr a candidate to gain any significant voter share.


It will pain some people for awhile that they cant use violent gun imagery for political gain but they will still get elected anyway.

Me and the victims of this crime wont have to hear as many of these types of phrases as we go into the future.

Sorry but at least you got to talk violently for awhile

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The really great thing is they have lost this discussion not in words but in the image market.

These images will no longer have the same possitive effect on enough voters fr a candidate to gain any significant voter share.


It will pain some people for awhile that they cant use violent gun imagery for political gain but they will still get elected anyway.

Me and the victims of this crime wont have to hear as many of these types of phrases as we go into the future.

Sorry but at least you got to talk violently for awhile

as long as far leftists continue to try and limit our freedoms, more people will accept that violent imagery is necessary to keep you usurpers in check.

 

[evince]

the really sad thing is is that no one is limmiting you in any way.

Its all made up bullshit and you just lap it up like pablum

 

[cawacko]

the really sad thing is is that no one is limmiting you in any way.

Its all made up bullshit and you just lap it up like pablum

no one is trying to limit our freedoms in government? have we entered an alternative universe? what was the patriot act for example? an expansion of freedoms?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Yes cheney id evil disstilled.

Now realoize the part yurt left out of my comments on chenneys death. I clearly stated AT THE END OF HIS NATURAL LIFE I woudld lift a glass.


I never called for his life to be shortened or talked of any second amemedment solution to his evil.


This is what some people do.

They try very hard NOT to understand what someone is saying.

They cant face the results of a real discussion of the issues so they create a whole new side show by pretending something else was said.


What we have is an entire faction of americans who use this method to distroy any possibility of this country coming together and solving our problems.


The really great thing is they have lost this discussion not in words but in the image market.

These images will no longer have the same possitive effect on enough voters fr a candidate to gain any significant voter share.


It will pain some people for awhile that they cant use violent gun imagery for political gain but they will still get elected anyway.

Me and the victims of this crime wont have to hear as many of these types of phrases as we go into the future.

Sorry but at least you got to talk violently for awhile

dumbass...i never talked about you and cheney, put on your reading glasses

this is exactly the kind of shit that is ruining this country and exactly why i said evince is happy for this massacre....despite posting comments and pictures from the left (even in this thread), evince chooses to lash out at "you" (the right) and completely ignore her own side. if she truly cared about the victims and violent rhetoric and its harm, she wouldn't be using this massacre to further her political agenda. and since evince didn't say boo about the below comment, i can only assume that she believes it is ok and non violent as she only calls out the right above.

"That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. He stole billions of dollars from the United States government and he's running for governor of Florida. He's a millionaire and a billionaire. He's no hero. He's a damn crook. It's just we don't prosecute big crooks."

 

[evince]

yurt do you really think this issue in the country revolves arround wether you think I dont blam dems enough?

You are so very lost in your world of blame you refuse to see the world this crazy kid lived in.

Have you noticed how polarizing arizona politics are?

why do you thin this nutter happened to be in Arizona?

Why did he happen to use a gun?

Why did he chose as a victim a democratic rep?

Why did wa he able to get off so many shots?


You will pretend those facts mean nothing.

I am too intelligent to pretend they mean nothing

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

yurt do you really think this issue in the country revolves arround wether you think I dont blam dems enough?

You are so very lost in your world of blame you refuse to see the world this crazy kid lived in.

Have you noticed how polarizing arizona politics are?

why do you thin this nutter happened to be in Arizona?

Why did he happen to use a gun?

Why did he chose as a victim a democratic rep?

Why did wa he able to get off so many shots?


You will pretend those facts mean nothing.

I am too intelligent to pretend they mean nothing

it isn't "the" issue, but is an issue, because you obviously believe the entire problem lies with the right side of the aisle. and you are A problem. people like are near worthless and do more harm than good.

tell me, why do you only focus on the right's rhetoric? why is you don't condemn or speak about how the left's rhetoric is harmful?

go ahead, explain it.

 

[cawacko]

yurt do you really think this issue in the country revolves arround wether you think I dont blam dems enough?

You are so very lost in your world of blame you refuse to see the world this crazy kid lived in.

Have you noticed how polarizing arizona politics are?

why do you thin this nutter happened to be in Arizona?

Why did he happen to use a gun?

Why did he chose as a victim a democratic rep?

Why did wa he able to get off so many shots?


You will pretend those facts mean nothing.

I am too intelligent to pretend they mean nothing

What would you have recommended him using besides a gun?

 

[christiefan915]

Really? Cheney is "evil distilled?" Now, what if some mentally unstable person were to read that, and think to himself, I need to do something about this distilled evil which exists... and I know what to do! I'll get a gun and go shoot his evil ass! Then, instead of being a pathetic low-life nobody, I will be a hero to the left, for killing this evil terrible person!

Of course, something like that could never happen in the real world, because psychotic nut jobs know full well that lefty liberals just spew shit like this and don't really mean anything by it! It's when the right use images with crosshairs and targets, or talk about "re-loading" (with information) to continue the debate... those things are what set psychos off, not anything the left would ever say!

Isn't that right, Christie?

Don't do it, Dix. Remember, he's on your side.

 

[christiefan915]

it isn't "the" issue, but is an issue, because you obviously believe the entire problem lies with the right side of the aisle. and you are A problem. people like are near worthless and do more harm than good.

tell me, why do you only focus on the right's rhetoric? why is you don't condemn or speak about how the left's rhetoric is harmful?

go ahead, explain it.

If this took place during the former administration, your point would have merit. Recently you (pl.) picked a Daily Kos article as evidence that libs are violent, too, but you RW hacks LIED about that picture. It was photoshopped. You RW hacks ginned up the controversy and you couldn't even do it honestly. So don't criticize us about violent imagery, you nest of vipers.


Right-Wing Media Falsely Claim Daily Kos Put Image Of Bull's Eye On Rep. Giffords

Hoft: "Top Leftist Blog Daily Kos Put A Bulls-Eye On Rep. Giffords In June 2008." In a January 10 Gateway Pundit post, Jim Hoft wrote, "Top leftist blog Daily Kos put a bulls-eye on Rep. Giffords in June 2008," adding, "[t]his hate speech must stop." In his post, Hoft included an image of Rep. Giffords and a bull's eye. The image Hoft posted said its source was a Daily Kos post. Hoft included the following image in his post:

Hoft screenshot

[Gateway Pundit, 1/10/11]

Wash. Post's Thiessen Directs Readers To Graphic Of Rep. Giffords With Bull's Eye. In a January 10 Washington Post article headlined "Stop blaming the Tea Party for the Arizona tragedy," Marc Thiessen linked to a HillBuzz.org screen grab of the photo shopped image of Rep. Giffords with a bull's eye. [Washington Post, 1/10/11]

Daily Caller Reports That Tea Party Express Fundraising Letter Linked To Bull's Eye Image On Giffords. The Daily Caller reported that in a January 10 fundraising letter, the Tea Party Express wrote, "The media didn't tell you that the left-wing website, DailyKos, had targeted Congresswoman Giffords, putting a BULLSEYE on her, did they? But that's just what happened." The letter linked to the HillBuzz.org screen grab of the doctored image. [Daily Caller, 1/10/11]
In Fact, Original Daily Kos Post Did Not Contain Image Of Bull's Eye

Original Daily Kos Post Did Not Contain A Picture Of Giffords Or A Bull's Eye. In a January 10 Daily Kos post, blogger Jed Lewison wrote that the Tea Party Express fundraising letter "actually goes so far as to suggest that a 2008 post written by Markos was somehow equivalent to Sarah Palin's use of the gunsight imagery and her exhortations to 'RELOAD" in the conservative battle against Democrats. Instead of linking to the actual post, the letter links to a photoshopped version, which ads an image of Rep. Giffords and a bullseye, neither of which were in the original post." Lewison links to the original Daily Kos post which indeed does not contain an image of Rep. Giffords with a bull's eye. [Daily Kos, 1/10/11]

http://mediamatters.org/research/201101110003

Here's a link to the original article of June 2008.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/25/541568/-2010-will-be-primary-season

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

If this took place during the former administration, your point would have merit. Recently you (pl.) picked a Daily Kos article as evidence that libs are violent, too, but you RW hacks LIED about that picture. It was photoshopped. You RW hacks ginned up the controversy and you couldn't even do it honestly. So don't criticize us about violent imagery, you nest of vipers.


ykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/25/541568/-2010-will-be-primary-season[/url]

this is hilarious. i never said one word about the KOS picture (you aren't singeling me out). and i think its incredibly partisan of you to now proclaim that because of ONE supposed photoshop image, that all the other numerous violent images and quotes cannot be criticized.

truly amazing how much you want to defend the left's use of violent rhetoric and imagery. so because one photo is supposedly false, all the other photos and quotes don't matter.

yeah christie, you really condemn both sides....

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I think they will.

no matter what side of the thing you feel is correct this issue is now seared into the brains of all Americans.

When someone tries to use the violent gun imagery in a campaign they will pay the price.

It wont come by the scorn it will come straight out of the brains of voters.

They will not want to be reminded of this horrible incident and using these images will make them think of it just out of automatic association.

Even if you think they are fine you will think of a beautiful little dark haired girl lyin in a pool of blood.

Not good campaign imagery huh?


this tactic is dead for anyone who wants to be elected.

LMAO.... please. Any rational person that has read about this asshole can see he was obsessed with Giffords long before Palin, long before the Tea Party. Any rational person can see that politicians have used such terminology in the past and that trying to limit expressions for 'fear of setting off a crazy person' is in itself... insane.... because ANYTHING can set of a crazy person.

 

[christiefan915]

this is hilarious. i never said one word about the KOS picture. and i think its incredibly partisan of you to now proclaim that because of ONE supposed photoshop image, that all the other numerous violent images and quotes cannot be criticized.

truly amazing how much you want to defend the left's use of violent rhetoric and imagery. so because one photo is supposedly false, all the other photos and quotes don't matter.

yeah christie, you really condemn both sides....

You ignored my sentence with the word "you" as a plural, meaning RWs in general.

"Recently you (pl.) picked a Daily Kos article as evidence that libs are violent.."

You claim the picture was "supposedly" photoshopped after I posted a link to the actual article showing no target or picture of Giffords.

Nice way to condemn the dishonesty of your side, yurtie.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Yes cheney id evil disstilled.

Now realoize the part yurt left out of my comments on chenneys death. I clearly stated AT THE END OF HIS NATURAL LIFE I woudld lift a glass.


I never called for his life to be shortened or talked of any second amemedment solution to his evil.


This is what some people do.

They try very hard NOT to understand what someone is saying.

They cant face the results of a real discussion of the issues so they create a whole new side show by pretending something else was said.


What we have is an entire faction of americans who use this method to distroy any possibility of this country coming together and solving our problems.


The really great thing is they have lost this discussion not in words but in the image market.

These images will no longer have the same possitive effect on enough voters fr a candidate to gain any significant voter share.


It will pain some people for awhile that they cant use violent gun imagery for political gain but they will still get elected anyway.

Me and the victims of this crime wont have to hear as many of these types of phrases as we go into the future.

Sorry but at least you got to talk violently for awhile

You are quite frankly.... batshit crazy.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You ignored my sentence with the word "you" as a plural, meaning RWs in general.

"Recently you (pl.) picked a Daily Kos article as evidence that libs are violent.."

You claim the picture was "supposedly" photoshopped after I posted a link to the actual article showing no target or picture of Giffords.

Nice way to condemn the dishonesty of your side, yurtie.

i ignored nothing and already changed the you because i knew you would automatically jump on that and IGNORE your partisan hackery that all other images should be ignored. see, you're just looking for a weak gotcha moment because i never said you singled me out, but you ASSumed that.

i am not going to condemn anything at this point, its a he said she said. you have a link, they have a link. what i do is that you want to excuse and ignore all the left's violent imagery and be EXEMPT from criticism the left's violent imagery and rhetoric because (and for the sake of argument, i'll assume its fake) of one faked photoshop.

great job there christie, way to condemn all the true violent imagery and rhetoric....

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

yurt do you really think this issue in the country revolves arround wether you think I dont blam dems enough?

You are so very lost in your world of blame you refuse to see the world this crazy kid lived in.

Have YOU actually read anything about this asshole other than what your masters have spoon fed you?

Have you noticed how polarizing arizona politics are?

While politics have certainly become polarizing, thanks in large part to people such as yourself, that seems to have very little to do with this tragedy. Yet certain polarizing assholes, such as yourself, are try to politicize the tragedy.

why do you thin this nutter happened to be in Arizona?

There are crazy people in every state Desh. You for example are currently in CA.

Why did he happen to use a gun?

Because Obama told him not to bring a knife.

Why did he chose as a victim a democratic rep?

Because he has been obsessed with her since 2007 when he asked her a question and felt that she did not answer it properly.

Why did wa he able to get off so many shots?

Because a semi-auto can fire off a lot of rounds and obviously there weren't enough armed citizens there thanks to Dems.

You will pretend those facts mean nothing.

what 'facts' desh? You are like 'he lives in AZ' and then pretend that had something to do with why he went off.

I am too intelligent to pretend they mean nothing

Desh, you are quite simply an idiot. You are a lemming who believes anything her Dem masters tell her.

 

[Canceled1]

this is hilarious. i never said one word about the KOS picture (you aren't singeling me out). and i think its incredibly partisan of you to now proclaim that because of ONE supposed photoshop image, that all the other numerous violent images and quotes cannot be criticized.

truly amazing how much you want to defend the left's use of violent rhetoric and imagery. so because one photo is supposedly false, all the other photos and quotes don't matter.

yeah christie, you really condemn both sides....

It's always a DEAD giveaway when shitsiefan915 is unsure of what she's spewed. All of the sudden she's papering the board morning, noon, and night "defending herself"!

BWA-HA-HA-HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!​

 

[christiefan915]

i ignored nothing and already changed the you because i knew you would automatically jump on that and IGNORE your partisan hackery that all other images should be ignored. see, you're just looking for a weak gotcha moment because i never said you singled me out, but you ASSumed that.

i am not going to condemn anything at this point, its a he said she said. you have a link, they have a link. what i do is that you want to excuse and ignore all the left's violent imagery and be EXEMPT from criticism the left's violent imagery and rhetoric because (and for the sake of argument, i'll assume its fake) of one faked photoshop.

great job there christie, way to condemn all the true violent imagery and rhetoric....

Watch it yurt, you're heading into hissy fit territory.

My link dates to 2008; the photoshopped picture dates to the Tucson tragedy.

You all are saying it's not political and should be taken as a stand-alone tragedy, yet RW pundits are quick to flood the blogosphere with articles that Loughner is a liberal. How about explaining why they're so eager to do this?

Right-wing Media Rush To Label Loughner A "Liberal"

Hoft Calls Loughner A " 'Liberal' Killer."

Big Journalism: "Inconveniently, A Former Friend And Bandmate Described Loughner As 'Left-Wing Political Radical' And 'Quite Liberal.'"

Hoft Cites Fake Facebook Page In Attempt To Link Loughner To Obama. In a January 10 Gateway Pundit post, titled "Whoops! This Changes Things- Loughner's Hero Was Barack Obama," Hoft claimed: "Even more curious are Loughner's 'heroes.' He mentions by name Venezuelan Communist Hugo Chavez, Latin American Communist mass-murderer Che Guevara, American Socialist revolutionary Saul Alinsky, and even Barack Obama." As evidence Hoft, cited a Free Republic message board in which commenter "Scanian" posted an excerpt from a Facebook page allegedly belonging to "Jared Laughner" [sic]. After the page was shown to be a forgery, Hoft removed the post with little explanation. [Gateway Pundit, 01/10/11; For screenshot, see Media Matters, 01/10/11]

Power Line: "What Little Evidence We Have Suggests The Shooter Was Politically Liberal."

Newsmax: Shooter "Fascinated By Leftwing Politics," His Favorite Books "Hardly The Reading List Of A Palin Supporter."

Geller Calls Loughner A "Lefty Loon." From a January 8 blog post on Geller's website Atlas Shrugs:

WND's Klein: "'The Communist Manifesto' And Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' Were Among The Favorite Reading Materials Of Jared Lee Loughner." In a January 8 WorldNetDaily article titled "Assassin's politics lean 'left wing, quite liberal...'"

NewsBusters' Sheppard On Loughner Enjoying Mein Kampf: Hitler's "Views Were Quite Opposite Of What Conservatives In America Currently Stand For."

Hannity: Some "Say This Pot-Smoking Communist Manifesto, Mein Kampf, Student Who Gets Kicked Out Of School Was Somehow A Conservative." On the January 10 edition of Fox News' Hannity, host Sean Hannity suggested Loughner was a liberal, saying, "Almost immediately, without any evidence -- knowledge about the shooter who he is -- The New York Times, others, say this pot-smoking communist manifesto, mind comp, student who gets kicked out of school was somehow a conservative." [Fox News' Hannity, 01/10/11 accessed via Nexis]

Hannity Cites Classmate To Call Loughner A "Left-wing Pot Head."

Geller: "Loughner's mental illness is as obvious as his leftism."

Hoft Complains AP "Blame[d] Palin & Tea Party For Shootings By Marx-Supporting Liberal Lunatic."

Beck: Is The Left "Creating" Or "Exploiting" The AZ Shooting? On his Fox News show, Glenn Beck declared that progressives were trying to "silence or discredit the opposition," which he claims they've been "trying to do for years."

Hannity Panel Agree: "[T]here Is A Witch-Hunting Mentality On The Left."

http://mediamatters.org/research/201101110025

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

So don't criticize us about violent imagery, you nest of vipers.

christie:

why do you believe that the left cannot be criticized for violent imagery?