Will Mark Meadows be arrested w Trump?

No, it would look like a witch hunt and he would gain sympathy.

Every so-called witch hunt, finds a pile of witches and the warlock in charge. Trump gets no sympathy. he is such a low-level petty asshole that he generates none.
 
Last edited:
The Democrats are trying to destroy this country with their hate and control and corruptness

We are saving it from a guy who wants to destroy it. Trump knows nothing about how America was established and he does not care. He will burn it all down if he does not get his way. You are guilty of the same things.
 
Every so-called witch hunt, finds a pile of witches and the warlock in charge. Trump gets no sympathy. he i such a low-level petty asshole that he generates none.

Yes they do, guilty or not.

That is why they are called witch hunts.

How many innocent people were burned at the stake because people thought they were witches?
 
Yes they do, guilty or not.

That is why they are called witch hunts.

How many innocent people were burned at the stake because people thought they were witches?

Do you think you made sense? When you investigate, they are innocent to proven guilty. Trump is the motherload of evidence. He is so full of himself that he doe not care if he says or does things in public. Those are not witch hunts. Those are criminal investigations In these cases, a criminal is at the bottom of the search.
 
Do you think you made sense? When you investigate, they are innocent to proven guilty. Trump is the motherload of evidence. He is so full of himself that he doe not care if he says or does things in public. Those are not witch hunts. Those are criminal investigations In these cases, a criminal is at the bottom of the search.

Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything criminally.

The left wants to go after Trump full steam for some supposedly classified documents he kept but want to ignore the bribery accusations against Biden.

That makes no sense to me.

They are apple's and oranges.
 
18 U.S.C. § 3056(a)

I understand why you did not post the wording, it does not say what you claim...


(a)Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons:
(1)The President, the Vice President (or other officer next in the order of succession to the Office of President), the President-elect, and the Vice President-elect.
(2)The immediate families of those individuals listed in paragraph (1).
(3)Former Presidents and their spouses for their lifetimes, except that protection of a spouse shall terminate in the event of remarriage.
(4)Children of a former President who are under 16 years of age.
(5)Visiting heads of foreign states or foreign governments.
(6)Other distinguished foreign visitors to the United States and official representatives of the United States performing special missions abroad when the President directs that such protection be provided.
(7)Major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates and, within 120 days of the general Presidential election, the spouses of such candidates. As used in this paragraph, the term “major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates” means those individuals identified as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with an advisory committee consisting of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority leader of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and one additional member selected by the other members of the committee. The Committee shall not be subject to chapter 10 of title 5.
(8)Former Vice Presidents, their spouses, and their children who are under 16 years of age, for a period of not more than six months after the date the former Vice President leaves office. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to direct the Secret Service to provide temporary protection for any of these individuals at any time thereafter if the Secretary of Homeland Security or designee determines that information or conditions warrant such protection.
The protection authorized in paragraphs (2) through (8) may be declined.

YOU CONSTANTLY LIE!
 
I understand why you did not post the wording, it does not say what you claim...


(a)Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons:
(1)The President, the Vice President (or other officer next in the order of succession to the Office of President), the President-elect, and the Vice President-elect.
(2)The immediate families of those individuals listed in paragraph (1).
(3)Former Presidents and their spouses for their lifetimes, except that protection of a spouse shall terminate in the event of remarriage.
(4)Children of a former President who are under 16 years of age.
(5)Visiting heads of foreign states or foreign governments.
(6)Other distinguished foreign visitors to the United States and official representatives of the United States performing special missions abroad when the President directs that such protection be provided.
(7)Major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates and, within 120 days of the general Presidential election, the spouses of such candidaes. As used in this paragraph, the term “major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates” means those individuals identified as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with an advisory committee consisting of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority leader of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and one additional member selected by the other members of the committee. The Committee shall not be subject to chapter 10 of title 5.
(8)Former Vice Presidents, their spouses, and their children who are under 16 years of age, for a period of not more than six months after the date the former Vice President leaves office. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to direct the Secret Service to provide temporary protection for any of these individuals at any time thereafter if the Secretary of Homeland Security or designee determines that information or conditions warrant such protection.
The protection authorized in paragraphs (2) through (8) may be declined.

YOU CONSTANTLY LIE!

You asked for me to cite the law, not the wording, and what did I lie about?
 
It’s going to be very interesting to me to see if Mark Meadows is arrested along with Trump or if he has taken a deal.

Rudy also, but it looks like he took a deal. No indications on Meadow yet.

I believe that Meadows has at the very least some limited immunity. He spilled his guts to Smith. He is about to become public enemy number one with the MAGA crowd.. I would also think that Rudy and Meadows are probably facing legal exposure in the Georgia case. This conspiracy is about to be fully exposed, and it is going to be an earthquake.
 
It’s going to be very interesting to me to see if Mark Meadows is arrested along with Trump or if he has taken a deal.

Rudy also, but it looks like he took a deal. No indications on Meadow yet.

I think he'll take a deal.
 
Of course it does, pretty simple logic really.

No it doesn't. Trump is a private citizen. Period. He has zero protection from prosecution and incarceration as it should be. Why are you wrong about everything? Are you lazy, or stupid, or both?
 
Back
Top