Well, lets see here. He supports torture. He supports an imperial Presidency as long as a Republican is in charge. He opposes workers rights. He is a drunkard. He opposes affordable healthcare for all. He opposes rights for immigrants even as spelled out in American law.
If you need more reasons, and obviously since you are a useful idiot no manner of rational reasoning will change you mind, the answer is still hell no.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/dail...s-journey-to-becoming-a-supreme-court-nominee
"As a circuit judge, Kavanaugh did his best to make that prediction a reality. Only a President can nominate a Justice, and Kavanaugh, in his opinions and his extrajudicial work, has cultivated a broad conception of Presidential power. In a notable case from late 2011, which I wrote about the following March, a three-judge panel of the D.C. circuit voted, two to one, to uphold President Obama’s health-care reform, the Affordable Care Act. Kavanaugh dissented, primarily because he felt that the lawsuit was premature. His sixty-five-page opinion included guidance for any Republicans who might follow President Obama in office. “Under the Constitution,” Kavanaugh wrote, “the President may decline to enforce a statute that regulates private individuals when the President deems the statute unconstitutional, even if a court has held or would hold the statute constitutional.” This is an extraordinary view. It is courts—not Presidents—who “deem” laws unconstitutional, but not, apparently, in Kavanaugh’s view. President Trump’s sabotage of the A.C.A. comes right from Kavanagh’s approach to the law.
Even more notable, Kavanaugh’s service in the Bush White House—and, perhaps, his view of future Republican Presidential patrons—led him to revise his Clinton-era view of the rights of Presidents who are under investigation. In a law-review article in 2009, Kavanaugh said that Presidents should not only be free from the possibility of indictment while in office but should also be allowed to avoid questioning from law-enforcement officials. He wrote that Congress should “consider a law exempting a president—while in office—from criminal prosecution and investigation, including from questioning by criminal prosecutors or defense counsel.” President Trump is not known as a voracious consumer of reading material, but, as he contemplated the possibility of a grand-jury subpoena from Robert Mueller, the special counsel, and its subsequent path through the courts, it’s easy to believe that he read Kavanaugh’s words with approval."
