Will JPP libs commit to supporting Kav if the FBI investigation reveals nothing new?

Hesher said:
He didn't answer the questions he badgered the democrats screaming conspiracy theory crap. You, like Kavenaugh, are being less than honest then you try to change the topic to ginsberg. Good Grief!
DoRAB10U0AEUsA5.jpg
Click to expand...

How many questions did she get asked about her high school behavior?
The girls kegger parties?
The party games?
Comments in her yearbook?
How many she put the moves on a guy?
Just how close did she want to dance with a guy?
What kind of boys did she like to date?
How much beer she also liked to drink? On what days? On what nights?
Where is her yearbook? Why didn't she bring it?
Why was the only bathroom in a well-to-do Chevy Chase neighborhood home the one in a 2nd floor bedroom? Was there not the usual bathroom on the ground floor?
Why doesn't she know much the attorneys that the Dems got her are going to charge her?
Why does she have a PhD and not understand a GoFundMe?
Has she ever in her life dealt with an attorney for anything?
Why doesn't she ask what the law firm's rate is?
 
Last edited:
She may be proven to be the biggest psychotic chicken-little crazy person of modern times ...

but then she will be "THEIR OWN psychotic chicken-little crazy person".



They don't burn bras anymore
 
Thing1 said:
Why do JPP libs have to "support" him?

I'm not a lib, but I support the process. If he's cleared of any wrongdoing and otherwise qualified, he should be confirmed. That doesn't mean I'll "support" him.
Click to expand...

For someone who claims not to be a lib why do you constantly parrot their talking points

You know the FBI can’t clear him right? I am not sure what you think the FBI can do. But know that they can’t clear him. They can merely take statements. That is it

Ford says she doesn’t know what house.

She says she doesn’t know when. The dumb cunt literally says “let me see Judges schedule and maybe I can narrow down my dates”. Think about that for a second. You are allowing jurisprudence to be turned on its head. And don’t give me this he isn’t due the presumption of innocence.

I have no doubt that when the FBI finishes taking statements and the demalquedacrats ask for yet ANOTHER delay you will be right there singing from their hymnal
 
Teflon Don said:
For someone who claims not to be a lib why do you constantly parrot their talking points

You know the FBI can’t clear him right? I am not sure what you think the FBI can do. But know that they can’t clear him. They can merely take statements. That is it

Ford says she doesn’t know what house.

She says she doesn’t know when. The dumb cunt literally says “let me see Judges schedule and maybe I can narrow down my dates”. Think about that for a second. You are allowing jurisprudence to be turned on its head. And don’t give me this he isn’t due the presumption of innocence.

I have no doubt that when the FBI finishes taking statements and the demalquedacrats ask for yet ANOTHER delay you will be right there singing from their hymnal
Click to expand...

Did you support Garland?

Oh - and I already said the other day that it's a he said/she said, and that they should just confirm Kav. Oops.
 
Thing1 said:
Did you support Garland?

Oh - and I already said the other day that it's a he said/she said, and that they should just confirm Kav. Oops.
Click to expand...

<squawk> garland <squawk>

Just like a good liberal running behind garland.

The two aren’t even comparable
 
Teflon Don said:
<squawk> garland <squawk>

Just like a good liberal running behind garland.

The two aren’t even comparable
Click to expand...

Not saying they are. But this thread only asks if libs would support a conservative nominee - on that level, they are comparable. And you can't answer that.

And you can't answer that you tried to portray me as a lib on this yet again - but I already said, after the hearing, that he should be confirmed. Got groaned by rana & everything. So, once again, you were wrong.

And hey - how's about that "he has the votes!" thread you started? That's a major egg-in-the-face. If I did something like that, I'd hear from you for 2 years about how much better at politics you were, and how my predictions were always wrong.
 
Thing1 said:
Not saying they are. But this thread only asks if libs would support a conservative nominee - on that level, they are comparable. And you can't answer that.

And you can't answer that you tried to portray me as a lib on this yet again - but I already said, after the hearing, that he should be confirmed. Got groaned by rana & everything. So, once again, you were wrong.

And hey - how's about that "he has the votes!" thread you started? That's a major egg-in-the-face. If I did something like that, I'd hear from you for 2 years about how much better at politics you were, and how my predictions were always wrong.
Click to expand...

At the time it was reported that he did have the votes dumbfuck.

You are so pissed about being wrong about 2016. You are still bitter that Grind and I were right and you were wrong.

Just admit you are a lib already. Everyone knows
 
Dark Soul said:
Simple question. Right now, will you commit to supporting him?

And if not, why? Otherwise the only valid assumption is that this is just another stall tactic.
Click to expand...
You support him because he's got his head up Trump's ass and he doesn't believe in the Constitution. Those are the reasons that I oppose him.
 
Dark Soul said:
Simple question. Right now, will you commit to supporting him?

And if not, why? Otherwise the only valid assumption is that this is just another stall tactic.
Click to expand...

Other than writing my Senators and saying “I support this guy.” How do you support a SCOTUS nominee?

And yes. This is a delaying tactic. I’m all for delaying a vote on Kav till after the midterm elections. I’m all for letting the people have their say. Aren’t you?
 
Quote Originally Posted by Dark Soul View Post
"Simple question. Right now, will you commit to supporting him?

And if not, why? Otherwise the only valid assumption is that this is just another stall tactic."

Illogical forced alternative. Another logical possibility is that more time is required to reasonably investigate.
Perish the thought.

Of course DEms will complain about the time. You take what you can get, and if it's still
unfairly brief you don't forfeit the claim. Dumbasses.

Republicans are desperate to obtain show stopping consent. Why?

The ONLY LOGICAL asummption is that they know Kav is a lying gang rapist, they know
they will lose in the midterms and they know that it takes more time to investigate than has been allotted.
 
Last edited:
What would be fucking hilarious and ironic as hell would be to invoke the special council and have a thorough investigation of Kavanaugh’s alleged misconduct. Is Kav’s old boss Ken Starr available? No? Oh darn. I’m sure someone suitable could be found. I believe Gloria Allred is available. Why she’d be a perfect choice to lead a fair and impartial investigation. How could Kav refuse such a fair offer and not be a hypocrite? LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top