Stringy, it doesn't matter WHY the language was put into the Constitution, no one is arguing that aspect. The proposition to remove said language has been put before the people once before, in 2004. It included a line about how education was a Constitutional right, which would have effectively given the State of Alabama the authority it needed to adopt a statewide school tax. This proposal was introduced after attempts to pass a massive tax increase failed at the ballot box. Everyone knew why they wanted to pass this proposition, and it had absolutely NOTHING to do with removing the language. The language issue was used as means to goad people into supporting their attempts to constitutionalize a statewide school tax, because their previous tax increase measure failed. Now jump ahead to 2012, the Republicans have revamped the very same proposition, the only change being in the line that guarantees a constitutional right to education, changing that to NOT a constitutional right, and the very same people who screamed "racism" at those who didn't support it in 2004, are refusing to support it now.
Now those are the facts, and I clarified my errors almost immediately after I made them in my first response to you. IF you want to continue parading that around claiming some sort of moral victory over me, so be it! I can't help that your life is obviously that pathetic, but you're not going to get away with spreading lies about this proposition and the history behind it or intentions of it.