Wife of NBA great Dwight Howard files for divorce after 6 months. WANTS HALF OF EVERYTHING

For the same reason he should get equitable assets after 6 months. If it is a mutual mistake, they should walk away with a fair distribution.

Now the question is what is "fair" or "equitable"? Given that it was only 6 month long, then it is only probably the assets that were commonly received in those 6 months. Assumably he had earned money before, and after, that there will be no attempt to divide.
thank you for showing a complete ignorance of how the law works in this country
 
where did the term 'incels' come from?????
irrelevant.

It has been taken over and is now known to be a term for an ACTUAL cohort of young men, growing in numbers, increasingly desperate, increasingly lonely, increasingly undatable, increasingly in parents basements playing video games... who end up killing themselves or others in a very misguided way.

Contrast that with the women you point out who are increasingly in better jobs, increasingly owning homes and building up great assets, increasingly independent but YES, if you ask them the one thing that is missing often it is a wish for a good man to marry and have kids with.

For the woman that is the missing gravy but she is still feasting and much happier than the man above regardless.
 
trump setup a pipeline of underage girls for him to have sex with. That was the reason for his "modeling agency." He thought being in a position of power allowed him to force these girls to have sex with him.

A normal person would have a more egalitarian view of things. A wife is not a slave, or property. She is a partner.
all of what you posted here is irrelevant to the topic. nice try at defleciton
 
Divorce is actually a state thing, so it works differently in different states.
right. something that low info people tend to ignore is how the laws actually work. they say 'there are laws', yet they don't bother to pursue how those laws actually work. maybe you should do that
 
Geebus you are truly an imbecile. Neither of those things are true.
Uh. It is. Affirmative action is institutionalized racism. It is hiring and firing based on race to meet some artificial 'quota'.
I do hate racism, and the sub human morons that promote it.
Then you should despise affirmative action as well.
I just wish that you'd hang with the racists that think people with pigment are too stupid to get IDs and need your help to get jobs, if you believe that folks with pigment shouldn't have an opinion because they are just too dumb go hang out with the racists that agree with you. Having any agreement politically with an imbecile like you makes me feel like I need a shower.
No one needs help to get a job or to get ID.

If you are worth something to somebody, they will pay you for it. Simple as that. Race has nothing to do with it.
If you apply for ID, and supply the necessary requirements to obtain it, you get the ID, simple as that. Race has nothing to do with it.
 
right. something that low info people tend to ignore is how the laws actually work. they say 'there are laws', yet they don't bother to pursue how those laws actually work. maybe you should do that
A lot of people say 'it is the law', when it isn't. They are just making shit up.

In terms of divorce, the judge has a lot of leeway, even in community property States, especially when it concerns such a short marriage. The charts are just a starting point for long term marriages ending in divorce. The ex-wife could end up paying alimony to the ex-husband.
 
irrelevant.

It has been taken over and is now known to be a term for an ACTUAL cohort of young men, growing in numbers, increasingly desperate, increasingly lonely, increasingly undatable, increasingly in parents basements playing video games... who end up killing themselves or others in a very misguided way.

Contrast that with the women you point out who are increasingly in better jobs, increasingly owning homes and building up great assets, increasingly independent but YES, if you ask them the one thing that is missing often it is a wish for a good man to marry and have kids with.

For the woman that is the missing gravy but she is still feasting and much happier than the man above regardless.
in other words, you have zero clue about anything, but you're a feminist and hopes it gets you laid.
 
Uh. It is. Affirmative action is institutionalized racism. It is hiring and firing based on race to meet some artificial 'quota'.

Then you should despise affirmative action as well.

No one needs help to get a job or to get ID.

If you are worth something to somebody, they will pay you for it. Simple as that. Race has nothing to do with it.
If you apply for ID, and supply the necessary requirements to obtain it, you get the ID, simple as that. Race has nothing to do with it.
Wow, you did not get what I was saying at all. I am not "for" those things, what I said was that neither of the things he said about me were true. You literally missed the main conversational context. There is no way you should be defending the sub human racist, if he feels that "negros" (as he put it) cannot give him their opinions on a subject, he is the sub human moron that thinks a race defines the person and therefore would fit in better with the folks that think black folks need your help to get jobs and are too stupid to get IDs.
 
Wow, you did not get what I was saying at all. I am not "for" those things, what I said was that neither of the things he said about me were true.
Okay.
You literally missed the main conversational context.
I have the context.
There is no way you should be defending the sub human racist, if he feels that "negros" (as he put it) cannot give him their opinions on a subject, he is the sub human moron that thinks a race defines the person and therefore would fit in better with the folks that think black folks need your help to get jobs and are too stupid to get IDs.
Okay. Clarified. Thank you....and I agree.

Both racism and bigotry are logical fallacies, and ugly ones as well. It is the compositional error fallacy involving people as the class, and for racism, a genetic trait as the property.

People that are racist, and that includes the government through affirmative action, are among the lowest of the low.

The word 'negro' means 'black' (Latin). It's use does not in and of itself cause the fallacy, even if you happen to mention people that have dark (or 'black') skin color. This is a genetic trait and there is nothing wrong with it (other than the other part of that trait, which exposes such people to sickle cell anemia, a very painful disease).

I have several black families in my own neighborhood. They are honest, hardworking people.

I also know of some white individuals in my neighborhood and in cities that are real slimes, supporting or conducting rioting, looting, arson, organized crime, and supporting the harboring of illegal aliens.

I also know of some very racist blacks as well as racist white, red, or yellow skinned people.

I don't care who it is. Racism and bigotry have no place in any society.
 
Back
Top