Superfreak
Verified User
She pretty much has, other than a requested quote or two on current events, you don't see her much
What world are you living in?
She pretty much has, other than a requested quote or two on current events, you don't see her much
Simple minded people need a boogie lady/man to blame for all their problems.
Oh, I guess you feel like you were included in my assessment, lol
I think it rather ridiculous for you and Thing etc... to be crying about people bringing up Clinton when she is non-stop in the news, when liberals continue to spout on and on about how 'she really won', when liberals continue to spout on and on about so called 'Russian collusion' by trump, but then they fall silent and pretend its 'old fake scandals' when it is actually the Clintons that seem to have colluded with the Russians and other foreign intelligence agents.
How is this a Current Event, you stupid bitch? Where's your link to the story?Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos, schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder, what better way to deflect and reaffirm the base but than regurgitating Clinton "scandals?"
Problem with the attempt is that it is old, it gets it expected endorsement and play on Fox and with the radio demogogues, the usual Congressman make their phony moralism appeals, and the conservatives eat it up, but it puts the rest of the Nation to sleep. Last year's scapegoats don't apply anymore, been there, done that
It does show the President is getting desperate if the best he can do is relive last year's election
Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos, schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder, what better way to deflect and reaffirm the base but than regurgitating Clinton "scandals?"
Problem with the attempt is that it is old, it gets it expected endorsement and play on Fox and with the radio demogogues, the usual Congressman make their phony moralism appeals, and the conservatives eat it up, but it puts the rest of the Nation to sleep. Last year's scapegoats don't apply anymore, been there, done that
It does show the President is getting desperate if the best he can do is relive last year's election
Why we're now seeing a upswing of attention on candidate Clinton,
No doubt about it.
I don't remember Romney or McCain even being mentioned all that much after Obama won both times. Certainly, there weren't daily threads about them.
Mueller's investigation is circling in.......
It's simple minded to bring up the person many democrats on this board continue to say should be President?
And it's simple minded when many liberal posters continue to say Trump voters got fooled and should have voted for Clinton but it's not ok to talk about Clinton?
I bet Bill wishes Hillary would shut her trap lol.
Both of them are within a gnats eyelash of criminal quid pro quo charges with Russians over the uranium deal and Hillary can't keep herself out of the news.
I'd be keeping a low profile if I were her.
It's simple minded and moronic for your side to keep talking about Clinton one year later .. but then again, what else do they have?
You sure you didn't vote for Trump?
So even though liberals refer to her as Madam President and current 2020 Democratic Presidential polls show her as a leader I must have voted for Trump because she still gets talked about? That's some very convoluted logic sir
Liberals can call her anything they want. What is that to you?
Liberals can kiss her ass if they wanted to .. what is that to you?
You claim there is more going on in the world than Trump and contentious politics .. but here you are talking negatively about Clinton while you stay mute about the idiocy of Trump and his supporters.
Liberals can call her anything they want. What is that to you?
Liberals can kiss her ass if they wanted to .. what is that to you?
You claim there is more going on in the world than Trump and contentious politics .. but here you are talking negatively about Clinton while you stay mute about the idiocy of Trump and his supporters.
Does that reasoning not apply both ways?
After the Supreme Court the second biggest selection Trump is going to make is Fed chief and he's about to F that up royally because he's a cheap money democrat at heart and we are going to pay for it
WHAT?
Trump is a fucking republican.
We don't need, require. nor desire your trash.