Why we conservatives don't care about Trump's multiple wives, boinking porn stars...

ThatOwlWoman said:
The "Family Values" party, which has pandered to the religious right for decades, has shown their true colors. They don't give a shit about morals, "values," fidelity, virtue, Christianity, or any of the other dreck they've paid lip service to over the years. Trump is living proof of that. What matters most to right-wingers? Money and nothing else.

As for Trump's infideity, lewdness, disgusting and vile behaviors in the sexual realm, the only thing I care about is how they are an example of a political party totally without an moral guideposts. None. Even if he exhibited none of those symptoms of a person with no moral compass, he is still totally unfit as a leader.
Click to expand...

You Democrats have forced us to abandon our family values position. At least we can take solace in the fact that Trump and the GOP will outlaw all abortions soon.
 
Don't bother, boys. Unread.

vYb6IcO.jpg
 
hvilleherb said:
No, but we do like to grab them.

We are the party of Donald Trump. You and yours are the party of Barney Frank.
Click to expand...

Really? Barney Frank is the leader of the Democratic Party?

Nice try, pusswipe. You just admitted you can even forge your own principles.
 
Right said:
For years we've been trying to explain to voters that "character counts" and received ridicule in return, or the issue has been conveniently ignored. "It's just sex", "you prude" are typical responses from liberals. Bill Clinton's huge flaws, from using Lewinsky as a cigar holder to his multiple rapes, Hillary's attacking his victims, did nothing to change the minds of the vast majority of Democrats. Hillary's obvious lies during her campaign, the media, and now we know the FBI, covering for her.

Now that Trump is POTUS and Hillary's not we have a huge victory on the character issue. In response Democrats continue to smear, lie, misrepresent, falsely accuse, even illegally use FedCo resources including the FBI to impune; anything in an attempt to malign the guy that destroyed their deeply flawed candidate.

So what if he divorced his second wife to marry a younger supermodel? Even if the rumors are true, that theirs is a loveless marriage, Trump screwed some porn star; we don't care. These are grown adults who can make their own choices in life.

We're not going to let Democrats lecture us on morality or hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

Bill Clinton's multiple rapes? I don't remember Bill Clinton ever being convicted of multiple rapes. Do you have any proof or is this a case of the right wing conspiracy machine continuing to smear, lie, misrepresent, falsely accuse in an attempt to malign the guy that destroyed their deeply flawed candidate?
 
Threedee said:
So you're backtracking from the only choice we had was Douchebag Donald and Crooked Hillary?
Click to expand...

No, poor little history major. The only viable choices we had in the general election were the respective nominees who defeated all the other candidates. Didn't they teach you anything about presidential elections at the community college you infested?
 
God bless America said:
No, poor little history major. The only viable choices we had in the general election were the respective nominees who defeated all the other candidates. Didn't they teach you anything about presidential elections at the community college you infested?
Click to expand...

Why don't you graduate before commenting on our majors? You said we only had two viable choices, and I pointed out that the GOP could have easily nominated someone else. Evidently the DNC rigged their nominating process.
 
Threedee said:
Why don't you graduate before commenting on our majors? You said we only had two viable choices, and I pointed out that the GOP could have easily nominated someone else. Evidently the DNC rigged their nominating process.
Click to expand...
chances are others would have lost to Hillary.
Trump had high negatives,but he also got a lot of Democrat/Independent voters in key states turnout
 
noise said:
chances are others would have lost to Hillary.
Trump had high negatives,but he also got a lot of Democrat/Independent voters in key states turnout
Click to expand...

Any loser Blue Dogs that he got to cross-over were made-up for by other voters who refused to support him. Meanwhile, Crooked Hillary had the same effect on her base, more of whom would have stayed home against a different opponent.
 
Threedee said:
Why don't you graduate before commenting on our majors? You said we only had two viable choices, and I pointed out that the GOP could have easily nominated someone else. Evidently the DNC rigged their nominating process.
Click to expand...

The GOP was limited in their choice of a nominee by the outcome of the Republican primaries, poor little history major. People who lose primaries are generally not selected to be the party's nominee.
 
Threedee said:
Any loser Blue Dogs that he got to cross-over were made-up for by other voters who refused to support him. Meanwhile, Crooked Hillary had the same effect on her base, more of whom would have stayed home against a different opponent.
Click to expand...

Is this your opinion, poor little history major, or is there evidence to support these assertions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top