Simple question, yes or no: Should ballots which have left the chain of custody be counted?
All pure inneundo, nothing proved, conservatives seem to propagate and echo innuendoes as facts, can you deliever proof election fraud has been committed?
Simple question, yes or no: Should ballots which have left the chain of custody be counted?
This was written back in February, I see nothing that's happened since that's changed the political landscape.
https://theweek.com/articles/757831/why-trump-win-2020
Trump will run in 2020, and I give them better than a 50% chance of winning. Sad.
Trump has to get through an investigation first. That is why he is acting so crazy now. He knows losing the House can risk Jared, daffy Jr and Trump himself being caught in criminal behavior. Trump has had no respect for the law his whole life and now it will bite him in the ass. If Trump is running, it will be from the law. He threatened the house if they investigate him, he will use his senate to investigate them. Not very presidential and very telling. He is scared. There is a reason and we al know what it is. Bannon said trumps biggest problem is money laundering and now it will come out.
We now have a system that is biased towards enabling the rule of the minority.
That is why I think the popular-vote losing Trump has a respectable chance in 2020.
The Republican party is routinely losing the national popular vote, and knowing they cannot sell their ideas to a majority of voters, have intentionally used their power in the government to engineer a system that allows the minority to maintain a stranglehold on the government through gerrymandering, voter suppression, caging, and dilution of the Voting Rights Act.
Perpetual rule by the minority, by the popular vote losers, is certainly not what the founders had in mind, and should be an anathema to a modern western democracy.
The Wall Street/donor/"job creator" class should only allow votes to be counted such that the results come out as they wish.
We don't even know who is running against him.
Ergo, meaningless.
perfect for the Dems.it will be a minority woman i.e. kamala harris.
it will be a minority woman i.e. kamala harris.
it will be a minority woman i.e. kamala harris.
perfect for the Dems.
Her disgraceful role at the Judiciary hearings won't matter to Dems -she's got the identity politics going for her.
And that's all Dems really care about.
perfect for the Dems.
Her disgraceful role at the Judiciary hearings won't matter to Dems -she's got the identity politics going for her.
And that's all Dems really care about.