Why shouldn’t the Democrat Party be canceled?

Rome and Egypt owned slaves and tortured people for entertainment

Actually, Rome did, but there is no indication that Egypt did.

So...explain how the pyramids (essentially gravestones) represent slavery, brutality and human atrocity.(It is okay to say that you cannot.)_

Well, you haven't made a logical argument, yet, as to why I am on the wrong side.

Syllogism:
P1: Supporting Trump is most assuredly "the wrong side of things."
P2: You are still supporting Trump.

C: Therefore you are on the wrong side of things.

Impeccable logic.

You elect officials who support tearing down Columbus. And today, a Lincoln statue is scheduled to be torn down by the Democrat party Brown shirt mob. And they have announced they are going to target more Churches, next.

Here's a Hot VZ. babe explaining what happened when the Left tore down statues in her once prosperous country...


She does look hot, but I would rather have my balls set on fire than watch anything with that other bitch in it.
 
WTF are you talking about? Wallace won five southern states in 1968. Wallace ran even with Humphrey in FL, and got more votes than Humphrey in SC, TN, and NC.

There are like 15 States that modern white libs call The South. Wallace couldn't even win a majority of the 11 Confederate States. :palm:
 
Actually, Rome did, but there is no indication that Egypt did.

So...explain how the pyramids (essentially gravestones) represent slavery, brutality and human atrocity.(It is okay to say that you cannot.)_



Syllogism:
P1: Supporting Trump is most assuredly "the wrong side of things."
P2: You are still supporting Trump.

C: Therefore you are on the wrong side of things.

Impeccable logic.

She does look hot, but I would rather have my balls set on fire than watch anything with that other bitch in it.

So when the Egyptians would burn people alive, you don't think they had an audience? Egyptians owned slaves, that's enough reason to tear down the Pyramids. That is Lib Logic. :palm:

The vid? ... well, I wouldn't want you to burst into flames like a vampire seeing a cross. The first 15 seconds his a youtube clip of just the Hot Babe.
 
Actually, Rome did, but there is no indication that Egypt did.

So...explain how the pyramids (essentially gravestones) represent slavery, brutality and human atrocity.(It is okay to say that you cannot.)_



Syllogism:
P1: Supporting Trump is most assuredly "the wrong side of things."
P2: You are still supporting Trump.

C: Therefore you are on the wrong side of things.

Impeccable logic.



She does look hot, but I would rather have my balls set on fire than watch anything with that other bitch in it.

What balls?
 
Wallace won 5 of those 11 and got more votes than Humphrey in three more.

Meaning desperate dribble. Did he win more than 5 of the 15? NO. Racsim was dying in The South. As the South became less racist, they stopped voted for fucking Democrats. That is obvious.
 
Between Nixon and Wallace's racism, Humphrey won just one southern state (TX). Nixon and Wallace won the rest.

Nixon did not run on a racist platform like Democrat Wallace did. To say Nixon was the same as Wallace is sooooo desperate. :palm:

A
 
Nixon did not run on a racist platform like Democrat Wallace did.

1. Yes, he did, this is what we are talking about with the Southern Strategy and "Law & Order"; the things you said didn't exist, but did. The things you then said existed, but never were put into practice, but they were.

2. Wallace wasn't a Democrat, he ran as an American Independent

Are you sure you're not a socialist? Because you're getting publicly owned here.
 
I certainly agree with you second sentence.

Not so much with the first.

"Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it." -- Confucious

"All women are beautiful, but some require more beers to see their beauty than others." -- Dutch Uncle
 
1. Yes, he did, this is what we are talking about with the Southern Strategy and "Law & Order"; the things you said didn't exist, but did. The things you then said existed, but never were put into practice, but they were.

2. Wallace wasn't a Democrat, he ran as an American Independent

Are you sure you're not a socialist? Because you're getting publicly owned here.

You have no evidence to support your desperate attempts to rewrite election history. Lee Atwater was 17 years old in 1968 :palm: You have no evidence of Nixon's mythical Southern strategy.

Just like you claim Republicans are not the party of Lincoln. That Democrats, are the real party of Lincoln.
 
You have no evidence to support your desperate attempts to rewrite election history. Lee Atwater was 17 years old in 1968 :palm: You have no evidence of Nixon's mythical Southern strategy.

Then how did Nixon manage to win 5 southern states?
 
Just like you claim Republicans are not the party of Lincoln. That Democrats, are the real party of Lincoln.

Today's GOP bears no resemblance to the one that existed in the 1860's.

For starters, there are no liberal Republicans today.
 
Then how did Nixon manage to win 5 southern states?

How did Wallace manage to lose The South running on a pure racist, democrat platform?

Nixon won those 5 because racism was dying in The South.
 
Back
Top