SmarterthanYou
rebel
yep. i hope he gets a 6 figure settlement
Why should this guy have been arrested?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
yep. i hope he gets a 6 figure settlement
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Since when and "brandishing" is subjective??
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Of course they're going to charge him with a very severe charge; because they know they don't have a leg to stand on and they're going to be hoping that they can force him to take a plea bargain, but anyone want to bet that this is all going to be dropped once they realize that they have to prove intent and that they can't.
Definition Of Brandishing Or Drawing A Firearm Under Penal Code 417
Brandishing or drawing a firearm, or other deadly weapon, can be a serious offense under Penal Code Section 417 if the following 4 elements of the crime are proved:
You took out, exhibited or drew a firearm, or other deadly weapon.
In the presence of another person.
And you did so in a rude, threatening or angry manner, or, you did so unlawfully while engaged in a fight or argument.
You were not acting in self-defense or defending another person.
Definition Of Brandishing Or Drawing A Firearm Under Penal Code 417
Brandishing or drawing a firearm, or other deadly weapon, can be a serious offense under Penal Code Section 417 if the following 4 elements of the crime are proved:
You took out, exhibited or drew a firearm, or other deadly weapon.
In the presence of another person.
And you did so in a rude, threatening or angry manner, or, you did so unlawfully while engaged in a fight or argument.
You were not acting in self-defense or defending another person.
I cant put a date on it and brandishing is subjective but courts have taken a very broad view of this. Holstered on slung on your shoulder, no issue, in hand.... well then you're on thin ice.
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
Jeez, what a miserable shithead you are! Okay, Ms. Congeniality, run and fetch me the Missouri statute dealing with OPEN CARRY. It's very simple, if OPEN CARRY is legal there, and that weapon was slung, and he didn't do any of the things in those links you provided, then the guy is an idiot. If OPEN CARRY is ILLEGAL in Missouri, Then he should have been arrested. I'm not participating in jarod's little legal eagle quizzes, so if you're so committed, go get me that statute and be quick about it
And its on video. Guilty.
I’m sorry for you illiterate fucks that can’t understand the law.
Get back to me, idiot, when somebody can interpret for you.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
From dumer's first link:
carrying a concealed weapon, such as a gun or knife
shooting a gun into a any structure used for assembling people;
displaying a deadly weapon in a threatening manner
possessing a potentially lethal weapon while intoxicated and handling it in a negligent manner
shooting a firearm within 100 yards of any occupied school, court or church;
shooting a firearm across or along a public highway;
carrying a firearm or other deadly weapon into a church where people have gathered to worship, into a precinct on election day or into any government building;
shooting a firearm at any person or other structure while in a moving vehicle; and finally,
taking a firearm, whether loaded or not, into a school or other school facility.
Which of these is dumer saying was done??
And from his second link;
(1) Carries concealed upon or about his or her person a knife, a firearm, a blackjack or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use; or
(2) Sets a spring gun; or
(3) Discharges or shoots a firearm into a dwelling house, a railroad train, boat, aircraft, or motor vehicle as defined in section 302.010, RSMo, or any building or structure used for the assembling of people; or
(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or
(5) Possesses or discharges a firearm or projectile weapon while intoxicated; or
(6) Discharges a firearm within one hundred yards of any occupied schoolhouse, courthouse, or church building; or
(7) Discharges or shoots a firearm at a mark, at any object, or at random, on, along or across a public highway or discharges or shoots a firearm into any outbuilding; or
(8) Carries a firearm or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any church or place where people have assembled for worship, or into any election precinct on any election day, or into any building owned or occupied by any agency of the federal government, state government, or political subdivision thereof; or
(9) Discharges or shoots a firearm at or from a motor vehicle, as defined in section 301.010, RSMo, discharges or shoots a firearm at any person, or at any other motor vehicle, or at any building or habitable structure, unless the person was lawfully acting in self-defense; or
(10) Carries a firearm, whether loaded or unloaded, or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any school, onto any school bus, or onto the premises of any function or activity sponsored or sanctioned by school officials or the district school board.
Now they might try to push #4; but they're probably going to have a problem with it, seeing as how intent seems to carry a lot of weight in the Courts.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
says the idiot that has no clue about the law.............fuckstick
Sorry shit-for-brains; but you don't have the right to walk around intimidating people in a threatening way. We're not a anarchy where idiots like you can run around threatening people at will without repercussions.
It's obvious a dumbass like you can't comprehend the OBVIOUS.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
if you're intimidated by someone walking around carrying a gun wearing body armor, I bet you have apoplectic shit fits when you see cops, don't you?
It's obvious a dumbass like you can't comprehend the OBVIOUS.
that it's obvious you're a panty pissing liberal coward? sure, I can comprehend that
If you think someone walking into public places wearing body armor, carrying an AR-15 and 100 rounds of ammo isn't attempting to intimidate, you are certifiable and should be under psychiatric observation.
Like I said, idiots like you do NOTHING to preserve our second amendment rights. Idiots like you only serve to scare more people and drive them into the gun confiscation coalition.
What is obvious is that you are a certifiable moron who should be under psychiatric observation.
Idiots like you do NOTHING to preserve our second amendment rights. Idiots like you only serve to scare more people and drive them into the gun confiscation coalition.
I do wish you had a brain larger than a pea.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
just more of your liberal appeasement ranting
like I said, just more of your ranting for liberal appeasement................typical scared liberal.What is obvious is that you are a certifiable moron who should be under psychiatric observation.
Idiots like you do NOTHING to preserve our second amendment rights. Idiots like you only serve to scare more people and drive them into the gun confiscation coalition.
I do wish you had a brain larger than a pea.
Idiots like you do NOTHING to preserve our second amendment rights. Idiots like you only serve to scare more people and drive them into the gun confiscation coalition.
Seek professional help.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Idiots like you do NOTHING to preserve our second amendment rights. Idiots like you only serve to scare more people and drive them into the gun confiscation coalition.
Seek professional help.
you need to just out yourself as a panty pissing liberal who's afraid of semi automatics...........we all know what you are by now.
Just a suggestion, dont feed the trolls.
