Why should the Dept. of Education be retained?

States can vary between rich and poor areas. If you want to use Arizona as an example, break it down by county, tax rates and average income.

The bottom line is that schools, teachers, books and transportation cost money. Cities can use organic public transportation systems, but rural areas are stuck with buses and bus driver salaries. Less money means less services. It's not rocket science.
Yes, the worst school districts in Arizona are usually rural or inner-city, or tribal, often the worst of all. Getting rid of the federal Dept. of Ed. and ending that funding by returning it to the states directly without a federal bureaucracy eating much of it up, is a way to increase funding, not lower it.

In fact, Arizona just had one school district see all of its Progressive Leftist administration and school board fired and tossed out because it spent nearly $20 million more than it was authorized. The depth of incompetence, graft, and waste was staggering.



This is a school district with really shitty outcomes and serves a lot of poor and non-English speaking students. But the amount of incompetence shown by those running it is jaw dropping.
 
Leaving it to the states might make it worse.

View attachment 43193
I doubt it, given how bad our education system currently is. But eliminating the federal Dept. of Education would eliminate a whole plethora of bad bureaucracy and federal rules much of which are related to DEI type policies. That frees up states to spend less on paperwork and lawyers dealing with the feds and puts that money back into schools and education. It likely will give teachers more time to teach and spend less time filling out paperwork to justify funding.
 
We've all heard that the Trump administration might get rid of the Department of Education in its entirety. There are arguments, mostly from the Left and teachers' unions, to keep it open and funded.

A lot of the discussion has been over why it should be disestablished. I'd like to know what the arguments for keeping it funded and running are, and how those are justified.
It should be shut down. It was an abomination created by none other than the failed Jimmy Carter. Another painfully stupid unconstitutional idea.
 
So now you're a dumbass on the run, you decaying dork. Pitiful

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic.

Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post

#146
And that, folks, is a self-styled monument to American manhood. ^

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic.

Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post

#146
I broke Ms. Moon just like Trump is going to break Hamas. LOL
 
Education is a national resource and should have a central point of coordination for quality.

Yet, since this agency was created it has done nothing but lowered our scores and standards. If you had even half a brain, you wouldn't defend the indefensible. Particularly being an uneducated mental case. :palm:

Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?

Additionally, as Reagan once stated, our nation's youth are our nation's greatest resource. Maximizing the education of all them is the best way to provide a wealth of educated workers and military personnel.

But this department hasn't done anything to maximize education. It has made it a laughing stock.

Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?

Grow a brain halfwit. :palm:
 
Example:

In 1985, he made it clear: the future of America rested in the hands of its youth, and their potential was worth celebrating.
Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?
 
The final nail in Top's coffin that proves she was never a teacher and actually hates them...meaning her sister, the real teacher in the family.
No, but you prove every day what an uneducated brainless dumbass you are.

Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?
 
I doubt it, given how bad our education system currently is. But eliminating the federal Dept. of Education would eliminate a whole plethora of bad bureaucracy and federal rules much of which are related to DEI type policies. That frees up states to spend less on paperwork and lawyers dealing with the feds and puts that money back into schools and education. It likely will give teachers more time to teach and spend less time filling out paperwork to justify funding.
Examples of "DEI type policies"?

Proof of "DEI type policies" affecting education?
 
Are you blaming that solely on the DOE? What about the fact that Republicans have consistently undermined education in the US for 30 years? Or that 92% of educational funding is local? IOWs, poor states have poorer schools? Guess which states those are, Terry?

There you go again, lying your dumb, leftist, brainless and uneducated ass off again.

Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?

Although the data in this is 15 years old, I strongly doubt it's changed much except for getting worse.

Then why use it? Because you really are that retarded?

Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?
 
States can vary between rich and poor areas. If you want to use Arizona as an example, break it down by county, tax rates and average income.

The bottom line is that schools, teachers, books and transportation cost money. Cities can use organic public transportation systems, but rural areas are stuck with buses and bus driver salaries. Less money means less services. It's not rocket science.
Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?
 
Leaving it to the states might make it worse.
Speculative bullshit from an uneducated nitwit. When States were running their own, we had far better educational outcomes at less cost. That all changed after 1989.

Can you show me where the Constitution states the Federal Government should be involved in education?
 
The large mirror array, solar thermal, in CA, was just shut down.


The smoke, they cut off the fire fighting water...


Don't believe me? Look it up!

-
They are finally shutting that green energy farce down now. ;)

Another massive waste of taxpayer billions. Bigger than even the Solyndra farce.
 
Back
Top