why Sandyhook parents are suing gunmaker
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
The stupidity of this case is astounding.
So... we should be able to sue automakers when a drunk driver hits someone?
So... we should be able to sue automakers when a drunk driver hits someone?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you weren't this vociferous when obama killed kids overseas, right?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
You seem to be obsessed with licking children... we should call the police on you.
Only white ones though. Young black lives do not matter.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
we note your general lack of compassion about the deaths of children, based upon who killed them. hack bot traitor and racist.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
brown ones don't seem to matter either, to the traitor race bot.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
well that is a nice emotional response, but what legal bearing are you using? Do you have precedent? Where else would you support a manufacturer being sued because someone used their product in a way that it was not intended?
For example, would you support 9-11 families suing Boeing because terrorists used their planes to fly into buildings?
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
May be getting close to 12b. I would delete the post if I were you
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Yeah, just lily white.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Are you bored with JPP at the moment?
Last edited:
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
No. Are you?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:
12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Valid... point taken... my bad.
That said... lets delete her bullshit about licking dead childrens blood as well. Given that is what prompted my ill-conceived reply.