Why not release the report?

Earl said:
“Fairness of procedure is “due process in the primary sense.” Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673, 281 U. S. 681.

In a long line of cases, the United States Supreme Court has held that impingement's of constitutional rights are, without variation, subject to the strictures of “due process” or notice and opportunity to be heard prior to their enactments."

The names of innicent people in Mueller's report must be protected.

Shove that up your culo and smoke it.
Click to expand...

I tried to explain that to him earlier. He just cannot understand.
 
Earl said:
Quit being a dishonest moron, if that is even possible.

Status of the Department's Review

"The relevant regulations contemplate that the Special Counsel's report will be a "confidential report" to the Attorney General. See Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. Reg. 37,038, 37,040-41 (July 9, 1999). As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter. For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel's report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6( e ), which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to "matter[ s] occurring before [a] grand jury." Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6( e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function.

Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6( e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6( e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

As I observed in my initial notification, the Special Counsel regulations provide that "the Attorney General may determine that public release of' notifications to your respective Committees "would be in the public interest." 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(c). I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you.

Sincerely,
William P. Barr Attorney General"

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/de...Committees.pdf
Click to expand...

3rd time
 
Yurt said:
It may be narrowly tailored, but it is still law, idiot.
Click to expand...

Narrowly tailored to that specific case.

Not tailored to the Special Counsel's report.

Besides, I thought it cleared Trump? So what is the due process that has yet to occur?
 
LV426 said:
That's suspicious.

Barr is not the arbiter of what I need to see.

Neither are you.

Release the report.
Click to expand...

What gives you the right to see it? Mueller's memo to Barr is confidential, by law. Even Mueller stated that.
 
LV426 said:
Narrowly tailored to that specific case.

Not tailored to the Special Counsel's report.

Besides, I thought it cleared Trump? So what is the due process that has yet to occur?
Click to expand...

And that is still law.

What law says Barr must release it? What right do you have to see it?
 
Yurt said:
What gives you the right to see it
Click to expand...

Oh, so now we shouldn't see the report!

The report you said clears Trump.

You: The report clears Trump.

Me: Let's see the report.

You: No.

That's where we're at.


Mueller's memo to Barr is confidential, by law.
Click to expand...

Mueller didn't write a memo, he wrote a report.

Barr wrote the memo.

For some reason, you're content to accept Barr's memo but not the actual report that can confirm if Barr was being genuine and truthful.

Not sure why you accept what the guy who covered up Iran/Contra tells you...
 
Yurt said:
And that is still law.
Click to expand...

When applied to that specific case.

Not applied to the Special Counsel.


What law says Barr must release it? What right do you have to see it?
Click to expand...

So now you're playing the game of "you don't have a right to see the report we say clears Trump, no really it does, it totally does, trust us when we say it does, nothing to see here, doo doo doo baby shark doo doo doo doo."
 
LV426 said:
Oh, so now we shouldn't see the report!

The report you said clears Trump.

You: The report clears Trump.

Me: Let's see the report.

You: No.

That's where we're at.




Mueller didn't write a memo, he wrote a report.

Barr wrote the memo.

For some reason, you're content to accept Barr's memo but not the actual report that can confirm if Barr was being genuine and truthful.

Not sure why you accept what the guy who covered up Iran/Contra tells you...
Click to expand...

Did I say we shouldn't see it. Again, what right do you have to see it.

Barr specifically quoted Mueller a few times and those were specific findings. So, stop lying that the findings were Barr's words.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top