Why is Romney allowing the President to define him.

Darla said:
Yes he is going to run a racially charged campaign. But you might not notice it. Let's see, are you the type who believed that Newt's "the foodstamp president' was not racially charged? Do you believe that Acorn being targeted had nothing to do with race?
Click to expand...

it's the suckers that think every statement made about Obama is a "racially charged" statement....
 
Darla said:
No, I am not referring specifically to them, I am referring to how Mitt is going to run his campaign. Yes he is going to run a racially charged campaign. But you might not notice it. Let's see, are you the type who believed that Newt's "the foodstamp president' was not racially charged? Do you believe that Acorn being targeted had nothing to do with race? If so you are just the sucker they're looking for! Don't worry you'll have plenty of company here.

It'll be interesting to say the least.
Click to expand...

Since they don't show political ads in my neck of the woods would you be so kind as to show me then when they do appear?
 
Jarod said:
In the battleground states of Florida, Ohio and Virginia the Preisdnet has unleashed, over the past three weeks, a barage of negative ads that appear to be working.

I am not suprised by this, what I am suprised is that Romney has not responded with anything, not even posative ads.

This is either a tactical decision with the intent being to hit the ground running after the olympics into the convention... or it is simply incompentance in the campaign. If it was a tacticaly decision, its a BIG gamble, because Romney needs to define himself before anyone else does, he is very much unknown. I know the thought is that the campaign will not be about Romney but about the president, and that is somewhat true... However In my opinion, the first choice undecidededs will have to make is if they like the President or not. If they decide they dont like the President next they will have to decide if Romney is better or worse. Failure to define yourself might very likely hurt Romney in this area.
Click to expand...
Because he can! In politics you throw shit at your opponent and see what sticks. If some shit sticks, you throw more of it. The shit Obama is throwing is sticking on Romney and not vice versa. That's how Obama is defining Romney. Bush did that brilliantly to Kerry right after he was savaged by Dems in the primaries.

That's where Reagan was amazing. His opponents threw more shit at him than monkeys at a zoo and none of it ever stuck. He was truly the teflon man.
 
Derp Derp said:
Because he can! In politics you throw shit at your opponent and see what sticks. If some shit sticks, you throw more of it. The shit Obama is throwing is sticking on Romney and not vice versa. That's how Obama is defining Romney. Bush did that brilliantly to Kerry right after he was savaged by Dems in the primaries.

That's where Reagan was amazing. His opponents threw more shit at him than monkeys at a zoo and none of it ever stuck. He was truly the teflon man.
Click to expand...

I agree Romney seems to not be able to find shit that sticks. Why not?
 
Forget the polls .. forget the money count .. forget every question on the upcoming election but this one ..

WHO WILL BEST SERVE AMERICA'S CORPORATE RULERS BEST?

The indisputable answer to that question is Barack Obama without question.

Winner: Barack Obama

Stop pretending that the American people choose presidents .. or that your government isn't OWNED by the pluotocracy.

Take the red pill.
 
Darla said:
I think Romney is going to go very negative. We all saw what he did to his fellow Republicans in the primaries. I think he plans on going so negative that they want to wait till the last minute to blitz an assault that is going to hit all of the American nerve points (yes, race) and he doesn't want time for a media backlash to kick in.

But you make a good point that he is allowing himself to be defined and thus it may be too late by the time he attacks Jarod.
Click to expand...

Darla just played the Democrat Party Race Card:

Obama-s-Race-Card-us-republican-party-22530026-504-381.jpg
 
Darla said:
No, I am not referring specifically to them, I am referring to how Mitt is going to run his campaign. Yes he is going to run a racially charged campaign. But you might not notice it. Let's see, are you the type who believed that Newt's "the foodstamp president' was not racially charged? Do you believe that Acorn being targeted had nothing to do with race? If so you are just the sucker they're looking for! Don't worry you'll have plenty of company here.

It'll be interesting to say the least.
Click to expand...

Darla's on a race role:

Obama-s-Race-Card-us-republican-party-22530026-504-381.jpg
 
Derp Derp said:
Because he can! In politics you throw shit at your opponent and see what sticks. If some shit sticks, you throw more of it. The shit Obama is throwing is sticking on Romney and not vice versa. That's how Obama is defining Romney. Bush did that brilliantly to Kerry right after he was savaged by Dems in the primaries.

That's where Reagan was amazing. His opponents threw more shit at him than monkeys at a zoo and none of it ever stuck. He was truly the teflon man.
Click to expand...

So you admit that Obama's campaign is just full of shit!! :eek2:
 
Romney was as is a weak general election candidate. That is why the lame stream media went so far out of their way to clear the field for him
 
GOP: Romney is terrible He's blowing it - losing to a Black guy

[SIZE=+1] Link

[/SIZE] Romney's campaign for president is coming under increasing pressure to change course
- or clean house - from establishment Republicans who fear the Romney campaign is
squandering a prime opportunity to win back the White House.

On Thursday, the whored-out Wall Street Journal editorial page ripped the Romney campaign
for its fumbling of the debate over whether the health care law signed by Obama includes a tax.

"This latest mistake is of a piece with the campaign's insular staff and strategy that are slowly
squandering an historic opportunity," the Journal wrote. "...Romney promised Republicans
he was the best man to make the case against Obama, whom they desperately want to defeat.
So far Romney is letting them down."


You guys knew Romney was a terrible candidate from the start.

Fact is, all your candidates were worse than Romney-the-terrible-candidate.

You have no decent candidates because your party is run by f-ing loons.

Bart

imagesCA4Q2VN9.jpg


romney-losing-elec.jpg
 
blackascoal said:
Forget the polls .. forget the money count .. forget every question on the upcoming election but this one ..

WHO WILL BEST SERVE AMERICA'S CORPORATE RULERS BEST?

The indisputable answer to that question is Barack Obama without question.

Winner: Barack Obama

Stop pretending that the American people choose presidents .. or that your government isn't OWNED by the pluotocracy.

Take the red pill.
Click to expand...

And not only America. Unlike the rest of us the plutocrats have no need for national boundaries. The world is their bank and they will see it starve before relinquishing one tiny bit of their bought power.
The Eloi live and are few, the Morlocks exist for them and are many.
 
interesting...so now negative campaigning...which obama has railed against...is "defining your opponent".....

you're hilarious jarod...
 
tinfoil said:
LOL
Way to scrutinize the sources!
Click to expand...

It's a joke dummy. I guess you have been living under a rock along with Cawacko, but when a very negative ad hits, it is almost always run on news stations, morning shows, and then the video is all over the internet. The video of the actual ad being the, you know, "source"?

In fact, the knowledge that this will happen saves campaigns and PACs a great deal of money. THey run it once then all of the news shows, nightly news, cable 24 news, and the political morning talk shows on the major networks, run it over and over in order to "debate" it. It's a free ride for them.

That is why making the claim that they dont' run political ads in your neck of the woods is specious. Maybe they don't pay for them to be run, but someone is showing them. For people who watch and read anything other than basketball and internet porn, they are actually very hard to avoid. Some of us try to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top