Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Ah, yes. It's always "different."
Why is it we have all these meetings between individuals with the Trump team
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Ah, yes. It's always "different."
it is different. clinton is proven corrupt. this is all fake news
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
How is it "fake"? Did the meeting never take place?
You guys just parrot Trump now.
ginned up headlines that barely fit the truth (innuendo) in order to do political damage = fake news.
How many times have we seen this formula? WaPo does it every day
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
the premise is fake........there is nothing wrong about the meeting.......
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's weak. I haven't seen any major news outlets report this as collusion. Even the "awful" CNN went out of their way yesterday to have legal commentators state that in itself, it didn't rise to the level of collusion.
You guys have zero idea what you're doing w/ the repeated claims of "fake news" based on really nothing. It is damaging out democracy in ways you haven't considered.
the meeting is a nothingburger. russiaphobia is a nothingburger. enjoy continuing to not accomplish anything on this fake news witch hunt. what's the timelimit of you guys constantly not coming up with anything before you give up and admit you've been deceived? 1 year? 2 years? How long?
CNN is VERY fake news.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
And we have a winner.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Never lol?
They'll quietly back away from it, like they were doing with the collusion theory, till this story popped up.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Didn't seem to bother you for decades w/ the Clintons.
All I've ever said is that the investigation should play out. Investigations take time. Sorry 'bout that.
they are not going to callit collusion ( although CNN has been so stupid as of late -who knows)
what they are doing is putting out claptrap to get coverage of fake news i,e. innuendo.
guilt by association /stretching the truth to make it read like collusion
( I've seen this NYTimes piece mention collusion without directly calling it collusion-read it)
It gets amped up by cable news , until it gets squashed, but by then the political damage is done.
This radiator clown will be the last holdout.
Getin the ring
Verified User
I wouldn't want to be Comey, Podesta or Hillary right now, going to suck to see them brought up on ethics violations
Amazing the collective memory deficits of those people, and all on the same issue.
trump's been proven corrupt also.
I bet you're now going to move the goalposts and say "but trump wasn't a politician."
Russians routinely meet with people in power in the US. Democrats meet with them all the time. Hillary met with them to sell them uranium.
The question is did they collude, and did they use the offered info to help their campaign. And if so, was it illegal, did it violate the espionage act?
This is for Muller to decide.
The question is did they collude, and did they use the offered info to help their campaign. And if so, was it illegal, did it violate the espionage act?
This is for Muller to decide.
When one of trump's toadies said Hillary should be shot for treason, cons ate that up with a spoon.
http://www.salon.com/2017/06/23/tru...t-for-treason-gets-invite-to-the-white-house/
Do I have to give you a primer on the uranium business? Not a single one of you cons gets it, no matter how often the facts are posted.