Why in date Russian nationalists if they don’t have constitutional rights?

Darth Omar said:
I believe there was interference.

Where myself and the McCarthy-ites part company is whether the interference had any measurable effect on the election outcome. Even Nate Silver won’t go as far as The Resistance on that score.
Click to expand...

I don't think we can know if it had any effect on the election. Comey's announcement they were reopening the email investigation probably had more of an impact since we can see Clinton's poll numbers go down.
 
Flash said:
I don't think we can know if it had any effect on the election. Comey's announcement they were reopening the email investigation probably had more of an impact since we can see Clinton's poll numbers go down.
Click to expand...

There’s a laundry list of effects that could have plausibly effected the outcome.

Forget the Russians. I would suggest that the next Democrat contender not label half the country as deplorables and go from there.
 
Jarod said:
Why indite Russian nationalists if they don’t have constitutional rights? Why not just go over there and grab them? Why presume they are innocent, and why give them a trial?
Click to expand...

The word is indict. I would think a REAL lawyer would not get it wrong twice. As for your question, you'll have to ask that taxpayer spendthrift Mueller what he thinks he is doing.

Good luck with that.
 
Flash said:
It shows what Russians did to try to influence our election in order to prevent future attempts. And so the the public can see what was done--especially those who refuse to believe there was any interference.
Click to expand...

It wasn't the Russians; but then, no one on the left cares what Julian Paul Assange; who was the benefactor of the hacked e-mails at the DNC.

Does anyone with even half a brain wonder why the servers were not handed over to the FBI for inspection and why no one cares what Julian Paul Assange had to say about the hacks?

Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecu...ressman-vows-to-prove-russia-did-not-leak-him
 
Darth Omar said:
There’s a laundry list of effects that could have plausibly effected the outcome.

Forget the Russians. I would suggest that the next Democrat contender not label half the country as deplorables and go from there.
Click to expand...

A bunch of anti-Hillary Facebook posts from right-wing sources or Russian sources have about the same effect. They strengthen the anti-Hillary views of those who already believed any negative stories about her. I don't think they changed the mind of any Clinton supporters.
 
Truth Detector said:
These are the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam having WMDs was a slam dunk; what do you think?
Click to expand...

I think Bush stretched that intelligence to justify his invasion of Iraq.

Is the intelligence also wrong about North Korea and Iran working on nuclear weapons?

Why does Trump keep asking Putin about meddling if none occurred? Now even Trump concedes it occurred.
 
Flash said:
A bunch of anti-Hillary Facebook posts from right-wing sources or Russian sources have about the same effect. They strengthen the anti-Hillary views of those who already believed any negative stories about her. I don't think they changed the mind of any Clinton supporters.
Click to expand...

You don't think there was a boatload of anti Trump facebook posts? STFU
 
Flash said:
I think Bush stretched that intelligence to justify his invasion of Iraq.
Click to expand...

You THINK wrong; Bush wasn't the ONLY one nor the ONLY country. Liberals need to pull their heads out of the bung holes and get some facts for a change.

Flash said:
Is the intelligence also wrong about North Korea and Iran working on nuclear weapons?
Click to expand...

It can be; it is not easy to get information from inside closed despotic controlled regimes. Do you naively believe that intelligence is flawless in every case? If so, why?

Flash said:
Why does Trump keep asking Putin about meddling if none occurred? Now even Trump concedes it occurred.
Click to expand...

Trump doesn't keep asking about Putin meddling, that would be the FAKE media. What Trump does know is that you don't accomplish anything by accusing a foreign leader of meddling without solid evidence, none of which have seen in this case.
 
Truth Detector said:
Trump doesn't keep asking about Putin meddling, that would be the FAKE media. What Trump does know is that you don't accomplish anything by accusing a foreign leader of meddling without solid evidence, none of which have seen in this case.
Click to expand...

I heard it straight from Trump, not the media. He now says he will bring it up again in the next meeting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top