Between 1965 and 1968? Ummmm....seriously?
Why I don’t believe Fords story
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
Between 1965 and 1968? Ummmm....seriously?
Old Trapper
Verified User
If it were the other way around, and the nomination were a Democrat, you sure as hell would believe her. When you were asked about the lie detector test your answer was "allegedly". No, it was not "allegedly", it is a fact that you do not want to accept. Unfortunately for your kind, not all people lie. Just your kind.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Seems pretty easy to deny being at a party when she can't provide any information about the party. Some any old party in a time frame of about a year will do I guess.
Do you think it's possible she's got Kav confused with someone else when she can't even remember the party?
She's setting herself up for some serious intense grilling if she goes to that hearing.
floridafan
Verified User
How does Kav say he wasn't at the party when he doesnt even know what party it was?????????
Because your personal judgment means everything to you and if your judgment is impugned by your misguided support of a sexual predator and serial prejurer, then that throws the rest of your personal judgment into question.
Basically, if this thread gets pulled, the whole fucking sweater unravels.
So that's the only reason you don't believe her; it's all about your own pathetic self-interest and ego.
BARF.
Get over yourself.
Old Trapper
Verified User
Why is no one talking about the drunken parties they had while at Georgetown Prep?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...k-judge-brett-kavanaugh-friend-christine-ford
Exactly.
He's categorically denying ever attending a party at all in high school. We know that's false because his friend who witnessed this attack said he was there.
What information would be enough to satisfy your entitlement?
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Because the accuser doesn't even know what party it was.
You don't forget sexual assault.
But you wouldn't know that because no one in their life felt comfortable telling you they were assaulted because you're a garbage person who lacks empathy.
Basically, you're a sociopath. Most Conservatives are.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
STFU. You're a fraud and a rayciss.
Old Trapper
Verified User
Who said she doesn't remember the party? Kavanaugh says he doesn't. Did she?
floridafan
Verified User
You are for
Worth repeating...so here goes:
Because your personal judgment means everything to you and if your judgment is impugned by your misguided support of a sexual predator and serial perjurer, then that throws the rest of your personal judgment into question.
Basically, if this thread gets pulled, the whole fucking sweater unravels.
So that's the only reason you don't believe her; it's all about your own pathetic self-interest and ego.
BARF.
Get over yourself.
It's not going to have the effect you think.
All it's going to do is show how poorly the GOP recognizes their bad optics.
After Anita Hill went through this in 1991, a record number of women won election in 1992.
There are a record number of women running for elected office this year.
The optics of 11 old, white, bigoted misogynists attacking a victim of sexual assault are poor.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Except I'm a liberal.
Another attempted rebrand that in a couple years you'll toss on the pile that includes a Bush/Cheney Shirt, a teabag, and a MAGA red hat.
I see right through you for the phony you are.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Basically, yes.
Some party at some time, somewhere. Never even suggests who else was there. Maybe it'll come out if she shows up at that hearing.
Last edited:
Ummm, she did say who else was there...Brett's friend Judge who says he got "blackout drunk". So...he's reliable, but she's not? Whaa?