Why I am am athiest
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Don’t entertain his bullshit “if” scenarios. There is no “if”. Ever.
The reality is that the force of gravity, just like all other physical contacts are EXACTLY what they are. No “ifs”.
Yakuda
Verified User
Ah I see the multiverse argument. There is more proof of the existence not the Easter bunny than multiverses.
If you admit time had a beginning then something outside that time had to have started.
You don't like fine tuning argument so you see a car and millions of other cars and conclude the one car you're seeing wasnt finely tuned because millions of others exit. Fine tuning is more rational than multiverses
It’s all part of your Bible, Doris. From Adam and Eve to Noah to Moses to Sodom and Gomorrah And there are shit tons of Christians that buy every word.
Yakuda
Verified User
Mrs one note song^^^^^^
Let try your theory "if" you had a brain you'd be dangerous. You don't have a brain because you're a deformed money.
Who said time had a beginning? Time is not a linear process, stupid fuck.
Yakuda
Verified User
Did you not read that posters entry you retarded donkey fucking cocksucker
Do this, cultist moron. I’ll challenge you just like I’ve done with any number of you wishful thinking idiots.
Give us an example of ANY “if” scenario that has ever occurred in the history of mankind.
I understand you are probably agnostic in regards to the Easter Bunny.
It's one thing to look at an impenetrable wall and say one doesn't know what is on the other side, it's quite another to claim there's a dude on the other side who manifested himself as himself to sacrifice himself to himself to atone his creation to himself and he did this in a nearly incomprehensibly remote and meaningless corner of a Roman colony 2025 years ago.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
Yeah, that’s what the authors of the NT books had in mind, all right.the old testament is to merely show a contrast between tribalism and actual morality.
Except Jesus. He said “Follow the law.”
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
and he also said "do unto others as they do unto you shall be the whole of the law"
the golden rule.
but you're an atheist, why are you distorting the teachings?
because you're a warhawk anti-human Zionist fuckjar?
Jesus said “Follow the law.”
That was his advice to his followers for them to get into the kingdom. Not “do unto others”.
Prove me wrong.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
the golden rule said otherwise.
it depends on what you choose.
we all cherrypick from the Bible.
you want to be a Zionist.
I'm sure it would be very convenient to have a belief system you didn't have to defend, while reserving the right to complain about religion as much as you want.
You claimed everything you need to know about atheism is found in an eight word dictionary definition.
I investigated, read, and listened to many of the seminal atheist authors and influencers of the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries, and have a good working knowledge of their belief system.
Your knowledge of atheism is limited to eight words in the Webster dictionary.
I have defended my position just fine. I can't help it that you are so uneducated that you can't even understand implicit atheism (even though you use the exact same reasoning every single day of your life)
That's because it's fucking simple. I lack a belief in your claims of a God.
No you watch Youtube videos.
You didn't understand them.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
cypress is luciferian masonic demon infested fuckstain who claims religous knowledge only to pervert it for the war machine.
Here's an excellent explanation of "Implicit atheism" for our local JPP folks who don't seem to be able to understand it:
Not Guilty =/= Innocent.
johndrogerslaw.com
Atheism is like a court case: the prosecution makes a claim of guilt and the job of the defense is to show that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim. (ie they DON'T prove innocence.)
Cypress claims "There is a God!" but can't muster any evidence for it, but that does NOT therefore mean I can draw the conclusion that there is no God, but rather I can say "Cy has shown no evidence to believe his claim".
NO ONE IS CLAIMING "GOD DOES NOT EXIST". What is being claimed is "You have provided insufficient evidence for me to believe your claim that God exists".
Otherwise you'd be like Cypress and "agnostic" about the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy!
Not Guilty =/= Innocent.
The Difference Between Not Guilty and Innocent
In the criminal justice system, the terms “not guilty” and “innocent” are often used interchangeably, but they do not have the same meaning. The difference...
johndrogerslaw.com
Atheism is like a court case: the prosecution makes a claim of guilt and the job of the defense is to show that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim. (ie they DON'T prove innocence.)
Cypress claims "There is a God!" but can't muster any evidence for it, but that does NOT therefore mean I can draw the conclusion that there is no God, but rather I can say "Cy has shown no evidence to believe his claim".
NO ONE IS CLAIMING "GOD DOES NOT EXIST". What is being claimed is "You have provided insufficient evidence for me to believe your claim that God exists".
Otherwise you'd be like Cypress and "agnostic" about the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy!