Why hasn't this teacher been fired?

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
Why hasn't this teacher been fired?

Teacher Admits To Spending Months Encouraging Her Middle School Students To Protest
https://go2tutors.com/project-veritas-ariane-franco/

https://www.projectveritas.com/news...r-encourages-students-to-engage-in-political/

NYC teacher Ariane Franco encourages her students to throw bricks and kneel in protest during the morning pledge of allegiance.

This teacher spends her time teaching students to violently protest instead of teaching them anything useful like, math, English, science, or whatever her subject matter is supposed to be. Given she teaches at a New York middle school, that means she's also a union member in a union that has done nothing about this either. Hell, they probably applaud her...

If there is a reason to doubt the efficacy of public education in America, here is a perfect example.

Fire this bitch, and do it today!

Oh, as a note: I'm betting the usual suspects on the Left here will attack the source without ever making a single attempt to defend the teacher's actions. That just shows how unable they are to defend the actions of one of their own when exposed.
 
Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O'Keefe in 2010.The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups. Project Veritas also uses entrapment to generate bad publicity for its targets, and has propagated disinformation and conspiracy theories in its videos and operations.
 
Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O'Keefe in 2010.The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups. Project Veritas also uses entrapment to generate bad publicity for its targets, and has propagated disinformation and conspiracy theories in its videos and operations.

And...

Right on que! Amazing! I predicted an attack on the source from the likes of you, rather than you trying to defend the teacher in the least. Got anything in defense of the teacher?
 
And...

Right on que! Amazing! I predicted an attack on the source from the likes of you, rather than you trying to defend the teacher in the least. Got anything in defense of the teacher?

The reality is Project Veritas has a history of selectively editing videos and putting out discredited content. I thought I read something that said the school district is reviewing this teacher. Because two things can be true; overall Project Veritas is historically not a fully credible source and what they filmed here is 100% accurate and this teacher should be fired.
 
The reality is Project Veritas has a history of selectively editing videos and putting out discredited content. I thought I read something that said the school district is reviewing this teacher. Because two things can be true; overall Project Veritas is historically not a fully credible source and what they filmed here is 100% accurate and this teacher should be fired.

So? Attacking the source does nothing. Address the content. You got nothin' saying the above. No source is 100% credible so claiming that as an excuse is just adding more logical fallacy to a failed argument.
 
So? Attacking the source does nothing. Address the content. You got nothin' saying the above. No source is 100% credible so claiming that as an excuse is just adding more logical fallacy to a failed argument.

You are right that no source is 100% credible but certain sources are more credible than others and when a group (any group) has a history of putting out false or distorted info you lose credibility. That doesn't mean they can't put out accurate info but it's very understandable to want to know it's been verified.

If MSNBC or CNN says something about Trump or any Republican do you automatically assume it's accurate? I don't based on their history. It doesn't mean what they are saying is automatically false but again, with their history I'm not going to assume it's accurate. But same deal, someone could accuse me of attacking the source and not addressing the content.
 
Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O'Keefe in 2010.The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups. Project Veritas also uses entrapment to generate bad publicity for its targets, and has propagated disinformation and conspiracy theories in its videos and operations.

this teacher doesn't work for Project Veritas......
 
Why hasn't this teacher been fired?

This teacher spends her time teaching students to violently protest instead of teaching them anything useful like, math, English, science, or whatever her subject matter is supposed to be. Given she teaches at a New York middle school, that means she's also a union member in a union that has done nothing about this either. Hell, they probably applaud her...

If there is a reason to doubt the efficacy of public education in America, here is a perfect example.

Fire this bitch, and do it today!

Oh, as a note: I'm betting the usual suspects on the Left here will attack the source without ever making a single attempt to defend the teacher's actions. That just shows how unable they are to defend the actions of one of their own when exposed.

Many of those at the January 6 riot must have taken her class.
 
You are right that no source is 100% credible but certain sources are more credible than others and when a group (any group) has a history of putting out false or distorted info you lose credibility. That doesn't mean they can't put out accurate info but it's very understandable to want to know it's been verified.

If MSNBC or CNN says something about Trump or any Republican do you automatically assume it's accurate? I don't based on their history. It doesn't mean what they are saying is automatically false but again, with their history I'm not going to assume it's accurate. But same deal, someone could accuse me of attacking the source and not addressing the content.

Depends. Most of the time, I think it's accurate but with a political spin put on it. That is, the facts presented--such as they are--are accurate but the talking head(s) then spin them with inaccurate context to present them in the worst possible light.

With this teacher, you get the video and unless you can show it was tampered with in some way, it is what it is and you can ignore any context that the presenters make.
 
NYC, dude. You answered your own fucking question.

Why do Trumpers hate State's Rights?

So, you are okay with a teacher letting her students fail at the very thing they should be learning (math, science, reading, writing, etc.) while teaching them to be violent revolutionaries against the state?
 
So, you are okay with a teacher letting her students fail at the very thing they should be learning (math, science, reading, writing, etc.) while teaching them to be violent revolutionaries against the state?

No. Why do you think I would, Chief?
 
Well, some here seem to be as they are more focused on trying to discredit the story than respond to it.

It's fucking NYC. The city of douchebags and cocksuckers. Why would you expect anything sane to come out of that shithole?
 
It's fucking NYC. The city of douchebags and cocksuckers. Why would you expect anything sane to come out of that shithole?

I don't. They have one of the most fucked up public school systems in the US right behind Chicago--probably the most fucked up--with California competing in a race to the bottom with them.
 
Back
Top