Why does Trump get a pass from the media.

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Trump often claims he was against the Iraq war, there is video of him supporting it. Why does the media never questioned him when he repeatedly says he was against it?
 
I believe the media did question him... but it was just a small snippet and he was speaking extemporaneously. Additionally maybe it does in fact help that he's not a career politician and doesn't have a voting paper trail, so it's very easy for him to spin something as 'I misheard...' or 'I was just bullshitting' etc
 
I hope Clinton puts an ad up of Trump supporting the war and now saying he didn't.
 
that would backfire given she actually did vote for the war and sent people to die. She was a Senator and had a much greater responsibility. That's not a game she is going to play, you can count on that.
 
Yeah, Trump gets a pass. Whatever.

The coverage of his convention and hers was almost night and day. Hers was a flawless perfection was his was marred with fear and darkness. That is CNN, the least biased of the group.
 
Trump often claims he was against the Iraq war, there is video of him supporting it. Why does the media never questioned him when he repeatedly says he was against it?

Because his opinion on it was meaningless being a private citizen.
 
Trump often claims he was against the Iraq war, there is video of him supporting it. Why does the media never questioned him when he repeatedly says he was against it?
Cause he wasn't in government. Trump is not as culpable for the immoral Iraq war as Hillary Clinton was.
 
Trump often claims he was against the Iraq war, there is video of him supporting it. Why does the media never questioned him when he repeatedly says he was against it?
Also, Stephanopoulos took it too Trump, albeit awkwardly, to task today when Trump showed his ignorance on the Ukraine.
 
Last edited:
I believe the media did question him... but it was just a small snippet and he was speaking extemporaneously. Additionally maybe it does in fact help that he's not a career politician and doesn't have a voting paper trail, so it's very easy for him to spin something as 'I misheard...' or 'I was just bullshitting' etc
Doesn't really matter. Trumps role in our going to war in Iraq was insignificant. If he says he supports it now...he's an idiot.
 
I hope Clinton puts an ad up of Trump supporting the war and now saying he didn't.
That's not going to happen. She'd be about the stupidest politician to come down the pike if she did that given her role in the Iraq war and given her change of mind about it now. One thing she is not is stupid.
 
Trump often claims he was against the Iraq war, there is video of him supporting it. Why does the media never questioned him when he repeatedly says he was against it?
the same reason the media doesn't hold Clinton responsible for the Libyan 2011 war,or her desired intervention in the Syrian war
or her clinging to "No fly" zones in Syria still today.

It's not pre-packaged sound bite 'newz' -it takes a little background to follow.
They stick with the daily soundbites instead.
 
Yeah, Trump gets a pass. Whatever.

The coverage of his convention and hers was almost night and day. Hers was a flawless perfection was his was marred with fear and darkness. That is CNN, the least biased of the group.
Given The Conventions have become giant infomercials and have little significance any more who cares? You're preaching to the choir anyway.

I think most people put too much influence on what any news media outlet says. Particularly cable where 99% of the time their just filling air time. There has always been yellow journalism and the American public is too educated to not discern propaganda or a sales pitch or telling you what you want to hear from real information. Fox News and MSNBC are organs for the two major political parties but their audience is self selected. It's not like there is only one official News Agency...the Government.

I mean call me naïve but I don't understand how anyone can blame any sort of media outlet when it is their responsibility to be informed and not the medias.

Now the media has a professional and public duty to provide information to the public but it's not what they are in business for and the level of public respect they receive is directly proportional to how well they fulfill that public service. There are examples in our past where they have done both a great job and a terrible one. In contemporary times they have done a terrible job and the respect they receive from the public is at historic lows.

Point being regardless of how lousy the current media system is at informing the public, as opposed to selling them tasty frozen treats, it is our responsibility to be informed and not theirs.

So I says if you don't like what ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, Fox, MSNBC or CNBC has to offer and don't think they fulfill their obligation to keep you informed...well then don't watch them. There's more ways to skin a cat and better ways to get informed than TV Networks or Cable TV.
 
that would backfire given she actually did vote for the war and sent people to die. She was a Senator and had a much greater responsibility. That's not a game she is going to play, you can count on that.

She can claim just about anything she wants....Democrats own the media.....
 
That's not going to happen. She'd be about the stupidest politician to come down the pike if she did that given her role in the Iraq war and given her change of mind about it now. One thing she is not is stupid.

Not to mention her husbands claims that Saddam was a threat to the US and had WMD, bio, chem, etc.....
Various Dem.'s claimed the same thing before Bush was elected including into 2002....

NO....she'll keep her mouth shut.....
 
the same reason the media doesn't hold Clinton responsible for the Libyan 2011 war,or her desired intervention in the Syrian war
or her clinging to "No fly" zones in Syria still today.

It's not pre-packaged sound bite 'newz' -it takes a little background to follow.
They stick with the daily soundbites instead.

An MSNBC reporter went so far as to clear his reports with the DNC before he submitted them to the TV station.....

Thats being in the bag......the DNC rigged the nomination process and the media helps rig the general election for the Democrats with favorable stories....
 
Last edited:
At least Trump isn't two-faced about his condemnation of Hillary for her early Iraq invasion support (since recanted). To Trump, that is evidence of her poor judgement.

On the other hand, when asked about his running mate's sponsorship of the House bill to invade Iraq (not recanted), Trump said, "It was a long time ago. And he [Pense] voted that way and they were also misled. A lot of information was given to people. He's entitled to make a mistake every once in a while."

Bravo. Trump's moral compass is spinning so fast you could generate enough power from it to light up Las Vegas.

But, it gets even better.

2000, In his book, The America We Deserve,
"The fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don’t, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us.”
Sept 11, 2002,
[Are you for invading Iraq?] "Yeah, I guess so. I wish the first time it was done correctly."
Jan 28, 2003,
"[Bush] has either got to do something or not do something, perhaps, because perhaps shouldn’t be doing it yet and perhaps we should be waiting for the United Nations, you know. He`s under a lot of 
pressure. He`s - I think he`s doing a very good job."
Mar 19, 2003, Bush invaded Iraq

Mar 21, 2003,
"[The Iraq invasion] looks like a tremendous success from a military standpoint and I think [Wall Street] is really nothing compared to what you’re gonna see after the war is over."
Jul 1, 2003,
"I think the president is doing a very good job. I would love to see New York City and some of the cities and some of the states get some of the money that`s going toward Iraq and other places."
Sep 11, 2003,
"It wasn’t a mistake to fight terrorism and fight it hard, and I guess maybe if I had to do it, I would have fought terrorism but not necessarily Iraq."
Nov 4, 2003,
"[Bush] is a very committed guy, he’s committed to that whole situation and I don’t think he will really reconsider. I don’t think he probably can at this point. Other people will, and you are going to find out at the polls whether or not those other people are right. I mean, you see more and more doves, if you call them doves. The question is whether or not we should have been in Iraq in the first place. I don’t think that this president can do anything about that. He is really — he is on a course that has to stay."
Dec 15, 2003,
"Ultimately, over the next year, two years, 10 years and 20 years, [capturing Saddam] is just a great thing for the free world."
 
Last edited:
Also, Stephanopoulos took it too Trump, albeit awkwardly, to task today when Trump showed his ignorance on the Ukraine.

The ones that are most afraid want to elect a man that knows the least, even on a rudimentary level..

I have a friend that's Hmong & a semi-trump fan & I told him that trump will send him back to Hmongolia..lol He said there is no Hmongolia, & I just smiled & said trump don't know that....lol
 
An MSNBC reporter went so far as to clear his reports with the DNC before he submitted them to the TV station.....

Thats being in the bag......the DNC rigged the nomination process and the media helps rig the general election for the Democrats with favorable stories....
good god.
don't go to WaPo online either..it's an absolute "shill for the Hill" rag site.
Our "free press" is bought and sold. It used to be subtle bias because most reporters are liberal .
Now it's blatant. They don't even try to disguise it.
 
Back
Top