Now you don't even know what a strawman argument is. A strawman argument is a logical fallacy where a person misrepresents anothers views to make it easier to dispute their arguments.
I'm not making an argument here. I'm asking you questions. Why are liberty and freedom just words to you based on the fact that you get so emotionally upset when people actually practice them here? Why don't you know what socialism is when you keep condeming it? Why don't you know the difference between a question and a logical fallacy like a strawman argument?
Wrong again dimwit; let me help you.
How comes words like "freedom" and "liberty" and "socialism" are just words to conservatives?
This is a strawman in that it infers that words are just words and lumps all Conservatives together as one homogenous group. But then, you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
We highly value liberal education and scoff at the notion of conservative education as being foolish.
Another strawman; the notion that there is such a thing as "conservative education" or that anyone is arguing for same. In addition you infer to speak for whomever this "we" is which suggests that not only are you a dimwit, but an arrogant dimwit at that. But then, you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
So why do conservatives like you hate liberty and freedom?
Another incredibly stupid strawman falsely inferring that all Conservatives don’t like liberty or freedom. But you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
Why don't you know what socialism is?
Another strawman based on your illogical soliloquy projecting your false perceptions about Conservatives onto them. But then, you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
Why is it that some conservative leader can just has to tell you the same lie over and over and over again and you believe it.
This wasn't so much a strawman as it was a false narrative with nothing more than "because you say so" to support it. But then, you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
Why are freedom and liberty just meaningless words to you?
Another strawman and weak attempt to attribute a claim to individuals and groups they never made. But then, you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
So why are they just words to you?
Another strawman based on a logical fallacy claiming someone stated something they never stated. But then, you're a dimwit and didn't know this.
Now anything else you need to be educated on as to why you continue to remove all doubt as to what an incredibly dense clueless hyper partisan buffoon?