Into the Night
Verified User
You are factually wrong. But, I can see you know nothing about philosophy and are just mouthing off.
Not a fact. An argument. Learn what 'fact' means. Inversion fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.
You are factually wrong. But, I can see you know nothing about philosophy and are just mouthing off.
"Phenomenology has been practiced in various guises for centuries, but it came into its own in the early 20th century in the works of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and others."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/
Not a fact. An argument. Learn what 'fact' means. Inversion fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.
There is no founder of philosophy or any of it's branches. False authority fallacy. Stanford does define philosophy or any of its branches.
You're an idiot. Sorry, your belligerent stupidity tests my patience.
There is no founder of philosophy or any of it's branches. False authority fallacy. Stanford does define philosophy or any of its branches.
Silly. When you have something of substance to say I will read it.
You have no patience, O Oversensitive One.
SEP is a standard reference for all professional philosophers. You're just somebody with opinions.
Frege is universally acknowledged as one of the founders of modern analytic philosophy. You simply opine on things without knowledge.
I care about truth. You care about sounding important.
A true follower of Jesus knows that the sin is in the intent, the harm it does. Not just the simple word. It's how a person uses fucking or cockroach that determines if they are on a Christian path, not whether they utter the words.
Do you believe Yakuda used cockroaches in a Christian loving manner? Yes or no, please.
I only want to know one thing!
Did Adam and Eve have belly buttons?
I've asked this question all of my life since I was about 10- NO ONE HAS AN ANSWER!
Well dang!
No. Myth just means an account of events which cannot be empirically tested for truth.
1A traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.???....do you make up your own definitions for other words or just the one you have to manipulate to support your arguments.......
There's obviously a difference between science and belief. Different planes of existence, the Multiverse Theory and other forms of existence are possible but unproved.
Arthur C. Clarke once wrote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."**
A lot of myth has a basis in fact. Things like Ezekiel's Wheels could be a description of advanced technology; be it extraterrestrial, extradimensional or extratemporal. Similarly with other legends like King Arthur. The documentation on a 2000 year old carpenter executed for sedition or blasphemy would certainly be below the historical radar unless they left a pretty big impact on the population. Those claiming "total fabrication" are often "total idiots".
Arthur C. Clarke's Three Laws:
- When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
- The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
none of them are what you said......this is what you said.....1A traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.
‘ancient Celtic myths’
1.1Traditional stories or legends collectively.
‘the heroes of Greek myth’
2A widely held but false belief or idea.
‘he wants to dispel the myth that sea kayaking is too risky or too strenuous’
2.1A misrepresentation of the truth.
‘attacking the party's irresponsible myths about privatization’
2.2A fictitious or imaginary person or thing.
‘nobody had ever heard of Simon's mysterious friend—Anna said he was a myth’
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/myth
Which of those definitions contradicted what I said?
Myth just means an account of events which cannot be empirically tested for truth.
This is known as Pascal's Wager fallacy. It has been used to try to prove Christianity before.