Why do liberals love Islam so much?

Yea Johnson is an odd case. If Vietnam had not stained his legacy he would have been considered one of our best Presidents.

He stained his own legacy by putting in a social welfare mindset with the belief that one person unwilling to do for him/herself is owed something by those already doing for themselves.

$22 trillion wasted on a foolish mindset of if you give someone something that they should be earning it will motivate them to do for themselves. The only motivation they get, and it's proven to be true, is to demand more of what another person has earned.
 
Johnson wrecked our economy? 3D where do you come up with this shit? I grew when Johnson was President. Not only was it one of the most prosperous periods in my life but more people were lifted out of poverty during his Presidency than at any other time in American history and no President in my life time implemented policies that were as catastrophic for the US economy as Richard Nixon did. I mean I'd like to read your alt history sources as I lived through both eras and your comments are divorced from reality.


I guess that's why the same percentage today are in poverty as before $22 trillion was wasted.
 
Liberals have targeted Black families for destruction. 70% of Black children are in single family homes. Single motherhood is the biggest contributor to poverty. Liberals are racist evil fucks.
 
Why do liberals love Islam so much?

This title reveals so much about the ignorance of those that insult "liberals".

a) The conclusion is the premise. In a court of law it's called "presuming a fact not in evidence".

b) If ANYone wishes to prove the premise, that "liberals love Islam" they're free to do so.

BUT !!

c) Ockham's Razor.
Defending our Founding principles is not exclusively Islamophilic.

But the resolute insulters here are either too ignorant to recognize a stand on principle,

or so unprincipled themselves that they recognize it, but mis-identify it for purpose of deliberately falsifying an issue.

"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." Thomas Paine

To sum things up, Islam is not a threat, but Christianity is.

Good one, granola cruncher. ;)
 
Why do liberals love Islam so much?

This title reveals so much about the ignorance of those that insult "liberals".

a) The conclusion is the premise. In a court of law it's called "presuming a fact not in evidence".

b) If ANYone wishes to prove the premise, that "liberals love Islam" they're free to do so.

 
there are good answers here as to why leftists/ liberals and muslims are one and the same. I will be redundant in my answer. it is the same testimony I will always testify to: there are two spirits in the world: the Holy Spirit also known as the Spirit of Christ and the spirit of antichrist; this is that unclean spirit of Lucifer. we do not see these spirits in the ethereal, nonetheless, every person is under the influence and power of one or the other. the damned of earth [muslims, leftists, liberals] are antichrists. it is very simple and no mystery. cain hates abel because abel's offering was accepted by The Lord because it was offered according to the will of The Lord and cain's offering was not accepted by The Lord because it was offered according to cain's self will [rebellion]/ self righteousness. until the corrupted seed of cain is rooted out of earth, the earth is troubled by the self righteous damned of earth. these things must be... everything is right on schedule [ever accelerating]... it is good.
 
Johnson wrecked our economy? 3D where do you come up with this shit? I grew up when Johnson was President. Not only was it one of the most prosperous periods in my life but more people were lifted out of poverty during his Presidency than at any other time in American history and no President in my life time implemented policies that were as catastrophic for the US economy as Richard Nixon did. I mean I'd like to read your alt history sources as I lived through both eras and your comments are divorced from reality.

You're talking about the Kennedy economy, which was strong. By the time Tricky Dick walked-in, he suddenly saw a need to implement measures such as price ceilings, and other idiocy, which further dragged-out the problem.
 
The other funny thing about JFK & LBJ is that they both told major lies about national defense on their way into office. Kennedy had the Bomber & Missile Gap, which probably put him over the edge. He then proceeded to weaken our position with the USSR by losing Cuba permanently, and having to withdraw missiles from Greece and Turkey. Johnson constantly tried to convince the public that Goldwater was a warmonger who would lead us into a nuclear war. He then proceeded to drop more bombs on Vietnam than were expended on both the Pacific and European theatres of WWII, combined.
 
The other funny thing about JFK & LBJ is that they both told major lies about national defense on their way into office. Kennedy had the Bomber & Missile Gap, which probably put him over the edge. He then proceeded to weaken our position with the USSR by losing Cuba permanently, and having to withdraw missiles from Greece and Turkey. Johnson constantly tried to convince the public that Goldwater was a warmonger who would lead us into a nuclear war. He then proceeded to drop more bombs on Vietnam than were expended on both the Pacific and European theatres of WWII, combined.
Don't forget the Gulf of Tonkin!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
We don't love Islam, we're just sane about it. Grind, for instance, once pointed out that he wasn't against Trump, but often wound up defending him because people were making wild accusations about him and thus came off seeming like a Trump supporter*. We constantly have to defend Muslims from irrational and bigoted attacks by people like you, just because you're so insane and hateful, and thus we come off as favoring them, which is ridiculous. You hate them so much that anyone who jsut treats them as regular human beings comes off as a fanatical defender of them to you. It's crazy.

*Of course, that is a lie, Grind is a fanatical Trump supporter. But I digress.
 
Is Sharia Law a protected religious freedom? If not, why not? Is the leftwing going to pick, choose, and shape the laws of Islam in their own image?
 
"On the surface, it seems a great mystery. Why would the leftist liberals who embrace abortion, homosexual rights, pornography, free love, sex, drugs, and rock-n-roll find Islam so endearing?

The Fort Hood massacre has made it abundantly clear. Liberals display a motherly, protective attitude towards a religion which:

flogs sodomites,
executes raped women for having had sex outside of marriage,
forbids females from showing their face, much less their fundamentals,
virtually enslaves women inside their own homes by forbidding them to walk in public without the accompaniment of a male relative,
displays the height of patriarchy in its polygamous culture,
essentially forbids musical instruments of any kind, much less Western rock-n-roll,
denounces not only hard drugs, but even the use of alcohol as a violation of morality.
permits, indeed, tacitly encourages, the removal of every young girl's clitoris by the age of seven without benefit of anesthesia.

Why would leftists who hold candle-lit vigils outside American penitentiaries constantly coddle men who publicly, and with great fanfare, chop hands, feet and heads from their own criminals?

Why allow the name of Allah and the practice of Ramadan into public schools while forbidding the name of Jesus and the practice of Christmas?

David Kupelian, of WorldNetDaily, argues that the left does this because they are spineless cowards, afraid of coming under the threat of deadly fatwah. But this cannot be the case.

After all, look at the leftist embrace of abortionists, men and women who wear body armor to their place of work. Even though you are much more likely to end up dead from being pro-life than you are from being pro-abort, the left constantly touts the dangers of being in favor of abortion. Liberals love to point to the possibilities of martyrdom inherent in promoting the "right to choose."

They can be brave when it comes to supporting their own principles. So why don't they bravely stand up to the Muslims who so clearly, so stridently, oppose so many of the things liberals claim to stand for?

The answer is simple.

Liberals and Muslims differ in their external expressions of how to live out their common fundamental value, but they do share a common, fundamental value.

Army Major Nidal Hakim Hasan was not the first to name the value, but he is certainly one of the more memorable: "We Love Death More Than You Love Life."

The liberals and the Muslims are both, at bottom, nihilists.

Like calls to Like across the deep.

They know each other, they have known each other since before either was born.

Major Hasan had to be protected and excused because Major Hasan is a liberal at heart.

He did to the soldiers at Fort Hood what every good atheist liberal has always wanted to do to those Christian, God-fearing, courageous American soldiers - he shot them through the head. He shot them through the heart. He drove a stake into them, chased them down while they were wounded and pumped more bullets into them. He shot them and shot them and shot them until their blood flowed like water, until their blood clotted on the floor, and then he shot them again. He destroyed them, he vented his rage upon them, he annihilated them for daring to question the annihilation that is coming to us all. He ground them to dust, the dust of the universe.

Major Hasan is a comfort to the liberals, he is the teddy bear they haven't had since they were six.

They want him to win, because when he wins, everyone loses.

We lose hope, we lose our belief in the True, the Good and the Beautiful, we lose our contact with God, with Life Himself. And isn't that annihilation of the bond worth a little bloodshed?

No, the Left does not fear Islam.

It adores Islam.

Islam does what the Left wants to do but cannot yet accomplish - it destroys.

Islam is the hero, the superman.

One day, the Left in the United States will do what Islam does today.

One day.

Soon.

Insha'Allah."

http://skellmeyer.blogspot.com/2009/11/why-left-loves-islam.html
 
When one examines the West's fear of Islam, and tries to relate it to the reasons usually given -- Muslim fundamentalism, militancy, radicalism, terrorism, totalitarianism -- it is difficult, if not impossible, to justify this fear on the basis of reasons given. One has to believe, however, given all the facts and expertise available to the West, that the fear has to be rational. What is this fear that causes enemies of the Muslim world to play subtly on the theme of the Crusades in order to demonize Islam and Muslims?

As for Islamic fundamentalism, Islamic law is based upon the Quran, examples and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, analogical deduction, consensus among the learned and individual reasoning. Strict interpretation of the Prophet's words leads to the conclusion that all who believe in one God are Muslim, and their faith is Islam; be they Muslim, Christian, Jew, or anyone else. Fundamentalism is defined in terms of Christian thinking. There is no parallel in Islam that stresses the use of reason and logic. Absent a definition, the label Islamic fundamentalism serves only to obscure issues, rather than to resolve them. Meanwhile, the Christian Coalition, and the Zionists and their biblical claim to Palestine appear fundamentalist to many; yet both are courted by US politicians, and not viewed as a threat.
 
When one examines the West's fear of Islam, and tries to relate it to the reasons usually given -- Muslim fundamentalism, militancy, radicalism, terrorism, totalitarianism -- it is difficult, if not impossible, to justify this fear on the basis of reasons given. One has to believe, however, given all the facts and expertise available to the West, that the fear has to be rational. What is this fear that causes enemies of the Muslim world to play subtly on the theme of the Crusades in order to demonize Islam and Muslims?

As for Islamic fundamentalism, Islamic law is based upon the Quran, examples and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad, analogical deduction, consensus among the learned and individual reasoning. Strict interpretation of the Prophet's words leads to the conclusion that all who believe in one God are Muslim, and their faith is Islam; be they Muslim, Christian, Jew, or anyone else. Fundamentalism is defined in terms of Christian thinking. There is no parallel in Islam that stresses the use of reason and logic. Absent a definition, the label Islamic fundamentalism serves only to obscure issues, rather than to resolve them. Meanwhile, the Christian Coalition, and the Zionists and their biblical claim to Palestine appear fundamentalist to many; yet both are courted by US politicians, and not viewed as a threat.

FYI, from 632 to 1095, there were no Crusades. There were a fuckload of Muslim attacks on the West, but, no Crusades were launched. That's a huge chunk of time for us to just be sitting there and not dishing anything back in response. Not much changed after 1095 with regard to Islam being a constant pain in the ass to deal with, and as we close out the 14th century of being constantly nuisanced by Muslims, that trend will likely continue.
 
There were plenty of wars between Christians and Muslims between 632 and 1095. Christians won some of them, but it's not Islams fault Christians generally sucked.
 
Because they don't deny global warming, don't think the earth is 6000 years old, are more serious in their faith and certainly less hypocritical than you cheeto eating illiterates who go to church on Sunday and cut the first person off the turnpike you see while giving the finger on the way back to watch your football game and to fuck your neighbor's wife.

Possibly the dumbest post I've seen on here. And that is saying a lot.
 
I'm sure I'll get hate for saying this, but they know it's true... One thing the Left and Islamic Jihadists have in common is that they both hate America and they both love controlling other people and feeling like they have dominion over others... They differ on WHY they hate America, but they're soul-sisters when it comes to hating America and blaming it for the world's problems (or their own).

The Left hates America because it allows capitalism, personal freedom, and Constitutional limits on the powers of government. It doesn't leave them much room to express their pathological godship. But it's also why they tend to go into professions of mass influence, such as: journalism, liberal arts, theater, education, mass communication, legal studies, politics, and basically any profession where they can have influence over a large audience of people at one time.

Islamic Jihadists hate America because to them it represents a large non-Muslim/infidel nation that is closely allied with Israel. They recognize that America stemmed from Judaeo-Christian values, often referring to it as a "Christian nation" even though it technically has no established religion. They recognize the great wealth and power that America has accumulated since its founding, and that it would not be easily controllable without corrupting it from within. They can see that their easiest way to corrupt America from within is to use the Left to do its bidding for them and to try and shame others into silence and passivity, which the Left is more than happy to help them achieve...

"The Left hates America", how facile. When cons use this phrase it confirms to me that they have no ability for complex thought and can only rely on sound bites to express themselves.
 
Back
Top