Why Do Blacks still support Obama?

How conveniently you forget Tim McVeigh, Terry Nichols and Gabby Giffords' shooter. You sound crazy.

None of those were TEA Party protesters and one was simply crazy, not "right wing" at all.

I picture people like Ayers' girlfriend, killed by a nail bomb they were building to blow up others with...

Rare is rare, and dudes with signs are not equivalent to terrorists like McVeigh or the Weathermen.
 
None of those were TEA Party protesters and one was simply crazy, not "right wing" at all.

I picture people like Ayers' girlfriend, killed by a nail bomb they were building to blow up others with...

Rare is rare, and dudes with signs are not equivalent to terrorists like McVeigh or the Weathermen.

Sez you. Well, thankfully, I don't take my marching orders from the likes of you.
Your flashes of lucidity, are, evidently, flukes...I almost believed you were regular.
 
That is the only thing they are good for ...is a laugh. I pay them no mind. I have a new sig. They best read it.

"Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one's definition of your life; define yourself."-Harvey Fierstein

That's a great quote poet! I'd never seen it before.
 
Please. It would be ludicrous for me to believe that people do or should think like me. I could care less. But how dare a black person, in good conscience, align themselves with a party that holds them in contempt, as "group-think". Are you or is anybody here blind to the gravity that the Tea Party presents? The Tea Party is the extremist right wing of the Republican Party. What would be its' leftist equivalent? The environmental activists, who want to strap themselves to Sequoias? Sorry, there is no extremist left wing of the Democratic Party. And certainly no wing that advocates racism, bigotry, or overthrowing the government, with visible firearms at the ready.
I have never understood black Republicans, or black conservatives. The only viable reason a black would be a Republican is if one is wealthy and could benefit from the generous provisions for the wealthy provided in the Republican platform. It's not called the "party of the rich", for nothing. Look at Allen West, and Herman Cain....singing the praises of the Republican Party, which clearly benefits no one but its' main constituency, "conservative white males". They seem like house negroes, pointing the direction to Massa in which runaway slaves, had taken off, in quest of freedom and opportunity. They are, in fact, "race traitors", who have collected their 30 pieces of silver (i.e. the prospect of public office and influence), in exchange for selling out their fellows to the Republican Party, intent on marginalizing blacks and persons of color, and ignoring their concerns and interests, which hardly supercedes their own.

Poet: "I have never understood black Republicans, or black conservatives."

That's evident. They are free Americans who are free of the mentality that you're still a slave to.

You are a racist.
 
Sez you. Well, thankfully, I don't take my marching orders from the likes of you.
Your flashes of lucidity, are, evidently, flukes...I almost believed you were regular.

I have never ordered you, or anybody here, in any way. Asking questions is not "marching orders"... It is deliberately disingenuous to suggest that my questions, based on what you said in posts to me today, are in any way "orders" or anything other than questions. I don't believe that they were even difficult questions, nor have I avoided any of your questions.

What you believe really has no bearing on my value as a human being, whether it be how you can assign a "moral compass" and "compassion" to me based on what you assume is my "race", or whether it be how awesome I am because I am willing to accept without question anything you say. Neither belief would add or take any value to or from my life.
 
Low, it's ok. Alias is caught up in "white privilege" which tells him that he knows what's best for everybody, and can tell black folks the truth about themselves. I just "flush", and keep on truckin'.

You reject anything that does not line up with your indoctrinated racist mind. You reject freedom of thought. You reject your fellow Americans and freedom of association based on skin color.

People like YOU are the problem.
 
I have never ordered you, or anybody here, in any way. Asking questions is not "marching orders"... It is deliberately disingenuous to suggest that my questions, based on what you said in posts to me today, are in any way "orders" or anything other than questions. I don't believe that they were even difficult questions, nor have I avoided any of your questions.

What you believe really has no bearing on my value as a human being, whether it be how you can assign a "moral compass" and "compassion" to me based on what you assume is my "race", or whether it be how awesome I am because I am willing to accept without question anything you say. Neither belief would add or take any value to or from my life.

Holy shit.

Get defensive much?
 
I reject anything that does not line up with my indoctrinated racist mind. I reject freedom of thought by others. I reject my fellow Americans if they are different than me and or based on skin color.

People like me are the problem.

Fixed that or you.
 
You reject anything that does not line up with your indoctrinated racist mind. You reject freedom of thought. You reject your fellow Americans and freedom of association based on skin color.

People like YOU are the problem.

I'm not a racist...I call out racism, from any quarter. What is freedom of thought, when it comes with a "catch"? My fellow Americans...everybody calling themselves American, ain't. Just like everybody calling themselves Christian ain't.
 
Right. The TEA Party is also not inciting violence, haven't blown anything up, and simply protest exactly like the left has done in the past. The equivalent of the TEA Party would be the war protesters during Bush's terms. Even the pictures are the same. Hitler mustaches, etc.

You are saying that they are the "extreme right"... They really aren't. The extreme right would be much more rare, idiots that blow up abortion clinics come to mind, just like images of burning ski lodges come to mind when I think of the extreme left...

If the "most extreme" the right can get is dudes with signs filling up the mall to protest government overreach then just wow... they must be the most peaceful people ever.

I think you missed a few events the TP was party to, such as holding the country and the world hostage over raising the debt limit, thereby causing our credit to be downgraded and US looking like a laughing stock in front of the world again. The motive power of the TP is the neo-con faction of the right, far enough to the right to certainly be correctly called extreme.

Or how about spending the first half of their terms working on repealing healthcare at the expense of every other priority?
Considering that they could never accomplish their goal, I call that pretty extreme and just as bad for the country.

Comparing the TP to leftist war protesters is particularly appalling. War protesters under BushII were powerless and accomplished nothing, certainly caused no national damage, unlike the continued wreckage the neo-cons and now the TP are respondsible for.
 
I'm not a racist...I call out racism, from any quarter. What is freedom of thought, when it comes with a "catch"? My fellow Americans...everybody calling themselves American, ain't. Just like everybody calling themselves Christian ain't.

No, you don't call out "racism". You call out people who don't line up with your racist mentality. You're indoctrinated with the belief that Democrats are your master. You're a slave to the lie you have been brainwashed to believe. You're still in chains.

How is that dope and chains workin' out for ya?
 
I think you missed a few events the TP was party to, such as holding the country and the world hostage over raising the debt limit, thereby causing our credit to be downgraded and US looking like a laughing stock in front of the world again. The motive power of the TP is the neo-con faction of the right, far enough to the right to certainly be correctly called extreme.

Or how about spending the first half of their terms working on repealing healthcare at the expense of every other priority?
Considering that they could never accomplish their goal, I call that pretty extreme and just as bad for the country.
I think that you are falling party to rhetoric and talking points and expect everybody to sheeple along with you. The President held old people's paychecks "hostage" in an effort to force political opponents... blah, blah..

Either side can speak about "hostage" but it doesn't make either of them terrorists. Duly elected congressmen stood on principle that got them elected, rhetoric notwithstanding that does not equate to the same thing as "most extreme" like McVeigh, it's flat retarded to say it does. That would be like calling Maxine Waters a "terrorist" because she thinks people who disagree should "go to hell"...

Comparing the TP to leftist war protesters is particularly appalling. War protesters under BushII were powerless and accomplished nothing, certainly caused no national damage, unlike the continued wreckage the neo-cons and now the TP are respondsible for.

So, action means nothing. They did exactly the same things but were supposedly ineffective and therefore you cannot compare? That's inane. I compare apples to apples here. They marched in the same places, often saying worse things, carrying signs that are so equal and comparable in content that it is astounding and you say that because they were "ineffective" in your opinion we can't compare them?

Dood, defensive much?
 
I think that you are falling party to rhetoric and talking points and expect everybody to sheeple along with you. The President held old people's paychecks "hostage" in an effort to force political opponents... blah, blah..

Either side can speak about "hostage" but it doesn't make either of them terrorists. Duly elected congressmen stood on principle that got them elected, rhetoric notwithstanding that does not equate to the same thing as "most extreme" like McVeigh, it's flat retarded to say it does. That would be like calling Maxine Waters a "terrorist" because she thinks people who disagree should "go to hell"...



So, action means nothing. They did exactly the same things but were supposedly ineffective and therefore you cannot compare? That's inane. I compare apples to apples here. They marched in the same places, often saying worse things, carrying signs that are so equal and comparable in content that it is astounding and you say that because they were "ineffective" in your opinion we can't compare them?

Dood, defensive much?

I stand by my statement that the TP have had actual effect, whereas the war protesters had none, hence they are not on the same level.
 
No, you don't call out "racism". You call out people who don't line up with your racist mentality. You're indoctrinated with the belief that Democrats are your master. You're a slave to the lie you have been brainwashed to believe. You're still in chains.

How is that dope and chains workin' out for ya?

I'll tell ya...you saying it, doesn't make it true or so. I'm gonna listen to a bigot, who can't tell the difference between a liberal ideology and right wing talking points? Please tell me what profit I garner by being racist in thought, word or deed, seeing that I am independent and work for myself, and am opposed to no potential client based on ideology or race? Chains? No, that's how you'd have me be...but I stopped working for the man 20 years ago.
 
Seven sentences defending your actions or yourself? I guess poet sruck some kinda nerve or something.

None of it was in defense of anything, The sentences were declarative and not plaintive, they described the actions of another as opposed to actions of mine as would be necessary in a defense.

In short, repeating that they were defensive because that is what you would like them to be doesn't make them so. It is solely a sign that you are short on reason.
 
Just wondering. He has done nothing to help them. In fact, he is too busy helping the millionaires by extending the Bush tax cuts...

And why is Obama afraid to be photo'ed with Al Sharpton? Seriously.

Obama is a conservative and most blacks that i know are liberals.

CK

To answer your question as to "why"....because , at the end of the day, after all is said and done...he is still ours, and we don't eat our young.
 
Back
Top