why are Right Wingers defending Epstein, bashing his vicitims?

But Trump neutered them by letting Acosta go.

Not really.

"Epstein likes to tell people that he’s a loner, a man who’s never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”"

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

Interesting that the article painted Epstein as an ascetic workaholic type, yet the Toadstool knew all about his penchant for women "on the younger side." Was this common knowledge then, or did Trump have insider info?
 
as usual, total horseshit


Evidence of the extent of Trump's relationship with Epstein shows the two were close, in at least some capacity. Epstein's "black book," where he kept contact information for his associates, contained 14 phone numbers for Trump, who also attended dinner parties at Epstein's homes and used his private jet at least once.

Over the years, Trump has denied having a close relationship with Epstein, such as in 2015, when a spokesperson said: "Mr. Trump only knew Mr. Epstein as Mr. Trump owns the hottest and most luxurious club in Palm Beach, [redacted], and Mr. Epstein would go there on occasion."

One of Epstein's accusers said she was recruited for his sex trafficking operation in 1999 at Mar-a-Lago, where she worked as a locker room attendant, according to documents filed in a 2015 civil suit. She alleged that when she was 15-years-old that Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell approached her at Trump's Palm Beach resort and enticed her to give Epstein a massage, which escalated into the financier allegedly sexually assaulting her.


https://www.businessinsider.com/jef...know-about-his-relationship-with-trump-2019-7

Trump throws his good friends out of Mara Largo lol?
 
I know, tough question

I have not noticed any wingnuts defending Epstein.

But I tell you what I have seen. Rightwingers are not showing much genuine concern for Epstein's victims, but spend most of their time in a calculated way to use Epstein to harm their political opponents. Tying Epstein to Clinton being one example.

And honestly, there are those on the left who are using this primarily to score political points as well.

I have not seen much genuine, articulated concern for the victims of Epstein. This thing is almost entirely being viewed through the lens of how to inflict political damage.

And that is exactly what the internets taught me years ago. When any obscure poster is hollering about rape, pedophellia, stalking, sexual harrassment, it is almost always done in a way calculated to do damage to political and personal opponents - and that tells you right there that genuine concern for the victims is not part of the calculation.
 
So you got run out of over there, and now you you are throwing your emotional facts around here.

Tell us how you are not racist, yurty. I never get tired of that one.
 
Last edited:
Calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist is one of Stretch's emotional facts.
 
I have not noticed any wingnuts defending Epstein.

But I tell you what I have seen. Rightwingers are not showing much genuine concern for Epstein's victims, but spend most of their time in a calculated way to use Epstein to harm their political opponents. Tying Epstein to Clinton being one example.

And honestly, there are those on the left who are using this primarily to score political points as well.

I have not seen much genuine, articulated concern for the victims of Epstein. This thing is almost entirely being viewed through the lens of how to inflict political damage.

And that is exactly what the internets taught me years ago. When any obscure poster is hollering about rape, pedophellia, stalking, sexual harrassment, it is almost always done in a way calculated to do damage to political and personal opponents - and that tells you right there that genuine concern for the victims is not part of the calculation.

their silence on both Trump's relationship and history with the rapist, along with backing Acosta's smarmy lies DOES constitute support for Epstein and a lack of support for their rape victims....not more complicated than that

and am not sure at all what you're trying to say about 'scoring points'...……...Trump's old buddy is a child rapist and sex ring operator...…….my 'political point' is?
 
Back
Top