Who's Going to Pay for the Wall

anatta said:
your new years resolution is to try to write something that isn't triple spaced taking up most of a page
Click to expand...

it makes my words so easy to read


it falls right into your brain with little effort


I bet more people read my posts than yours
 
Guille said:
FailBot.
Click to expand...

see grind


you end up with the same result as always

you are a sociopath


we also don't let low intelligence born people run NASA



there are reasons you cant be much of an aid to our nation


YOU cant understand the full range of being a human


Its OK you can still have a full life


you just cant pretend to be a moral human

YOU cant process those ideas with your broken sociopathic brain
 
evince said:
see grind


you end up with the same result as always

you are a sociopath


we also don't let low intelligence born people run NASA



there are reasons you cant be much of an aid to our nation


YOU cant understand the full range of being a human


Its OK you can still have a full life


you just cant pretend to be a moral human

YOU cant process those ideas with your broken sociopathic brain
Click to expand...

Am I Grind or Damo?

And...FailBot.
 
evince said:
its that wall of blue water


that is the wall they will get
Click to expand...

Do you get off by chucking shit to the kids and then having them chuck it back? Do you think it accomplishes anything?

Why not take a chance on the 'Above Plain Politics' section with some of the grownups?
 
montgomery said:
Do you get off by chucking shit to the kids and then having them chuck it back? Do you think it accomplishes anything?

Why not take a chance on the 'Above Plain Politics' section with some of the grownups?
Click to expand...

you are not a grown up bot hole


I am banned from AP and have been happily for years


when grind banned me from it I thanked him


I use invective like most adults do


I would forget to not use it in those threads


so I thanked him


you stay at the childs table if it suits you


I belong at the adults table
 
evince said:
you are not a grown up bot hole


I am banned from AP and have been happily for years


when grind banned me from it I thanked him


I use invective like most adults do


I would forget to not use it in those threads


so I thanked him


you stay at the childs table if it suits you


I belong at the adults table
Click to expand...

I still have hope for you. I can probably get you back in the APP section. No bans are permanent.
 
Hello montgomery,

montgomery said:
Do you get off by chucking shit to the kids and then having them chuck it back? Do you think it accomplishes anything?

Why not take a chance on the 'Above Plain Politics' section with some of the grownups?
Click to expand...

Good luck with that. I can't picture it happening.

Before you came here, we had a thing. A lot of people agreed to have a 'Clean Debate Week.'

I didn't start it, but I was all for it. Of course, I signed right on without hesitation. I didn't have to change any of my habits to participate. (Actually, every week is clean debate week for me.)

Evince also agreed to participate, (surprisingly,) and then when it actually came around, didn't even last the first morning. No way evince could last in APP.

Evince thinks being nasty is an effective way to change people's minds, thinks it is a way to 'put down lies.'

I think it runs off polite people who are offended. It actually did that to one person that I am well acquainted with. I had enjoyed exchanging posts and messages with this individual on another smaller chat board. I told him about this place and he was intrigued by the volume. I said, man, there is so much activity you can't possibly keep up. I said this is the big time, and warned him it is rough. He agreed to try it. I don't think he made it to 10 posts before Evince got a hold of him and jumped down his throat in a super-vulgar way. He told me: "No thanks," and promptly left. We still exchange emails. He said it was because of Evince.

Being nasty runs polite people off. Those could be more voices to put down lies, much more effective than fewer nasty people saying the same ugly things over and over, becoming desensitized to it, assuming everybody does it and is also desensitized to it. Everybody is not desensitized to it, and it runs them off. The evidence is the member list. Ever look at at? Just start anywhere and begin reading the stats. Most of the 'members' are not active. They showed up, made a few posts, and left.

We are left to wonder why.

Take a big fat guess.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello montgomery,



Good luck with that. I can't picture it happening.

Before you came here, we had a thing. A lot of people agreed to have a 'Clean Debate Week.'

I didn't start it, but I was all for it. Of course, I signed right on without hesitation. I didn't have to change any of my habits to participate. (Actually, every week is clean debate week for me.)

Evince also agreed to participate, (surprisingly,) and then when it actually came around, didn't even last the first morning. No way evince could last in APP.

Evince thinks being nasty is an effective way to change people's minds, thinks it is a way to 'put down lies.'

I think it runs off polite people who are offended. It actually did that to one person that I am well acquainted with. I had enjoyed exchanging posts and messages with this individual on another smaller chat board. I told him about this place and he was intrigued by the volume. I said, man, there is so much activity you can't possibly keep up. I said this is the big time, and warned him it is rough. He agreed to try it. I don't think he made it to 10 posts before Evince got a hold of him and jumped down his throat in a super-vulgar way. He told me: "No thanks," and promptly left. We still exchange emails. He said it was because of Evince.

Being nasty runs polite people off. Those could be more voices to put down lies, much more effective than fewer nasty people saying the same ugly things over and over, becoming desensitized to it, assuming everybody does it and is also desensitized to it. Everybody is not desensitized to it, and it runs them off. The evidence is the member list. Ever look at at? Just start anywhere and begin reading the stats. Most of the 'members' are not active. They showed up, made a few posts, and left.

We are left to wonder why.

Take a big fat guess.
Click to expand...

and your proof that your style is more effective?


I understand the desire for it to be more effective


Its not


Im not on the internets to be nice to people who agree with me.


and I actually am much more kind to those who agree with me


the proof is in the pudding


this is a very active site ( it was not when I came here in its first days)



how active is AAP?


not very




I am here to kill lies dead



I am an adult



I fight like one



and I kill lies
 
montgomery said:
I still have hope for you. I can probably get you back in the APP section. No bans are permanent.
Click to expand...

Mine are.

I don't *ever* take anybody off my Ignore List. I give them a chance to apologize if it is warranted, I often PM them and let them know privately that I am offended and considering placing them on Permanent Ignore, but if they don't back off right away, and pledge to show respect, they go on my Permanent Ignore List and they don't ever come back off. And if they change names and come back and attack me personally again, I just add that new name to the IgList. One and done. That's my PIP.

"Personal Ignore Policy PIP: Very simple. I am into civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Flame on me, mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you go on my Ignore List. Zero tolerance. PERMANENT. Forever. No exceptions ever. And you will be banned from any Thread I create. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top