Who will run in 2016?

Well first let me correct myself. I thought you said social democracy, not social liberalism. Social deomcracy is not at all related to libertarianism. My mistake on that.

You however, are still incredibly wrong. Democrats do not believe in Libertarian policies at all, and have not voted in any way (nationally) to indicate otherwise.

Oh, I disagree. Ill give you an example... Prayer in school. Democrats don't want the government in schools promoting religion or prayer to our children, Republicans do. Where, in your opinion do libertarians fall on this issue?
 
Ok, I just read your article, it was painfully long and as a Democrat I barely was able to get through it, but are those the governors you are talking about?

ROFLMAO...

Rick Scott? Really? I don't know much about the others but if he is any representation of the others 2016 would be a cake walk for even John Roberts or Dennis Kucinich to beat...!

Wow, so you picked the one person you know about and latched on to him? Ok Garud
 
ROFLMAO...



Wow, so you picked the one person you know about and latched on to him? Ok Garud

I only knew one in the group and said so... The one I know is a JOKE.. and I said IF he is a representative of the quality of the others...
 
Why do your posts never have any substance, they are so often simply a parot of something someone said with... "idiot" "fucking hilarious" or some other inane comment with no meat...

Here Ill help you out here...

Why do you believe my comment about his attack on Murphy Brown is funny?

Tell us Garud, what substance did your post have? You claim he 'attacked' Murphy Brown (a fictional TV character)... He pointed to the portrayal of the TV character while discussing family values. Yet you think this is some sign of a lack of intelligence??? A politician discussing their values is a lack of intelligence to you?

Also... is this 'your posts lack substance' your new schtick? You really want to go there given your propensity to ramble on without ever a suggestion of substance in your posts?
 
Ok, I just read your article, it was painfully long and as a Democrat I barely was able to get through it, but are those the governors you are talking about?

Rick Scott? Really? I don't know much about the others but if he is any representation of the others 2016 would be a cake walk for even John Roberts or Dennis Kucinich to beat...!

Why don't you ever provide substance in your posts Garud?
 
Ok, lets look at Rick Snyder... A short internet search of him shows him to be another venture capitalist billionaire.

Do you really think that's who the Republicans are going to nominate after 12'?
 
Oh, I disagree. Ill give you an example... Prayer in school. Democrats don't want the government in schools promoting religion or prayer to our children, Republicans do. Where, in your opinion do libertarians fall on this issue?

The Libertarian position is that government shouldn't be involved.
 
Ok, lets look at Rick Snyder... A short internet search of him shows him to be another venture capitalist billionaire.

Do you really think that's who the Republicans are going to nominate after 12'?

Snyder wouldn't even carry his own state. He is a failure and a traitor.
 
What did I leave out that you would need to know here? I made my point. I did not simply sling an insult.

yes Garud, you did... you said he was a joke, yet provided nothing of substance to support such a claim. You didn't address a single thing the article stated. You just called him a joke as if that was enough to invalidate the entire article.
 
yes Garud, you did... you said he was a joke, yet provided nothing of substance to support such a claim. You didn't address a single thing the article stated. You just called him a joke as if that was enough to invalidate the entire article.

I was not writing an evaluation of your article. I was making a comment about your article. A substnastative comment.
 
Back
Top