I simply call him NoName, since he has no established moniker name. Even in the Monthly Contest ratings, he will appear under that nym. It's easier than using "JPP's resident crack head", and that phrase could be applied to numerous leftists here.
YARP What makes you think I care?
Thank you for your gratuitous and meaningless insult. I win!
Irony.
You're an idiot so it's no surprise you don't know what socialist society means or is.
That is not what socialists desire.
Another area in which you emulate Trump...declaring a "win" when it is inappropriate.
Irony from leftist morons who claim winning is actually losing and cheer Iran on.
He can't. Like most of the MAGAts on JPP, Terry is an elderly man sinking to the throes of dementia. He's driven away family and friends. Is there any doubt his behavior IRL is the same as on JPP?
There is no such ideology here brainless wonder.
Projecting again.
the government mandating products from private companies is clearly fascism.
Until recently I have had a reasonable relationship with TA...and with Stone...but this Trump thing seems to be upsetting the applecart.
Well, I see a win when the other side in a debate has nothing left but ad hominem and insults. That's where you're at. For example, I'll use this commonly trotted out "proof" that US healthcare is poor by world standards study.
I'm seen the negative indications in Terry for a couple years now. Stone is just a spoiled overgrown man-child. Neither of them are capable of change.
More "stupid" from the forums dumbest troll.
I will agree that this study is bullshit as it contains politiczed bullshit items.Well, I see a win when the other side in a debate has nothing left but ad hominem and insults. That's where you're at. For example, I'll use this commonly trotted out "proof" that US healthcare is poor by world standards study.
Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing U.S. Health System
Analyze the 2024 "Mirror, Mirror" report to understand global health system performance and insights for improving health care quality and access.www.commonwealthfund.org
Go to "Exhibit 1."
They use five (5) primary ratings:
Access to care
Care process
Administrative efficiency
Equity
Health outcomes
Access to care, administrative efficiency, and equity all heavily favor socialized medicine while having NOTHING, nada, zip-point-shit to do with the quality of the healthcare system a nation has. Those are a combination of managerial measures and DEI values, with "Equity" being particularly applicable to the later.
The one measurement that shows the quality of the healthcare system itself is "Care process." There, the US is, unsurprisingly, second (#2) on their survey.
Then there's "Health Outcomes." As the study notes further down:
The ongoing substance use crisis and the prevalence of gun violence in the U.S. contribute significantly to its poor outcomes, with more than 100,000 overdose deaths and 43,000 gun-related deaths in 2023 — numbers that are much higher than in other high-income countries.
They also included the Chinese Disease lockdown period in this measure. Their own study shows, by their measure, that Sweden who didn't lockdown at all, actually faired better than many countries that did. The study also has little or no problem apparently--from the wording they use--with nations that resorted to the most draconian and totalitarian measures during that panic, like say, Australia.
So, on this measure, their results are heavily skewed by including deaths not due to healthcare or the healthcare system, by including measures of equity and access, and in general skewing their ratings to heavily favor socialized, government run medicine.
Wow. So brilliant.That is not what socialists desire.