Who thinks Iran is going to replace the guy Trump killed with....

Jarod said:
Who here thinks the Iranians are going to replace the guy Trump killed with someone more friendly to the United States?


So then what was accomplished?
Click to expand...

Oh look!! THE DUPLICITOUS JACKASS WHO WENT FROM "TRUMP's NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE EMBASSY, BECAUSE HE's WEAK" to "TRUMP DID SOMETHING, HE'S A WARMONGER" in a matter of hours, BACK WITH MORE SILLIASS BULLSHIT.

THE IRANIANS DO NOT HAVE ANYONE ELSE WTH SALEIMANI's TERRORISM EXPERIENCE, DIPSHIT, and HOW MANY AMERICANS' BLOOD DOES A TERRORIST HAVE TO HAVE ON HIS HANDS, BEFORE KILLING HIM IS A "GOOD IDEA" IN LYINGASS LEFTGOOFYWORLD...
 
anatta said:
so you don't understand Soleimani was a charismatic figure with the ability to get disparate forces to work together?
His very presence was an attribute in itself -and cannot be duplicated ( any more the al-Baghdadi was for ISIS).

Plus he was a planner -not just for terrorism , but for Iranian hegemony in the region.
Click to expand...

The evidence you war mongering Neocons have presented that this Solemani dude was a threat to the United States is razor thin and mostly based on conjecture, opinion, and assertion.

After the Iraq War debacle, and due to the fact Trump is a known pathological liar, I see no reason to take your or Trump's word on the dire necessity of this assassination
 
Flash said:
What would be the U. S. rational response if another country removed our elected president and replaced him with their puppet?
Click to expand...

That would probably be war. Granted, I don't see how that's comparable to removing a general.

On the other hand, if a foreign power killed one of our generals, that would probably mean war as well.

Iran is in a different position from us in one vital respect though. They aren't the world's most powerful military force, so they have to operate a bit differently. They should know that a war with us would mean they would lose.

Now, if you're referring to the removal of Mossadegh, I understand why the Revolution happened.
 
Woko Haram said:
This is an interesting conclusion. If we actually are to believe that Iran is NOT a rational actor, why did Obama make a nuclear deal with them? That seems like a really bad idea.

Personally, I do believe they are a rational actor. I don't want us to go to war with Iran, but this assassination might have the effect of getting Iran to think twice about how they operate in Iraq.
Click to expand...

It can't be a bad thing for his replacement to be wary of those around him, nothing like some paranoia that he'll be on the wrong end of a Predator missile attack to concentrate minds.
 
Grokmaster said:
Oh look!! THE DUPLICITOUS JACKASS WHO WENT FROM "TRUMP's NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE EMBASSY, BECAUSE HE's WEAK" to "TRUMP DID SOMETHING, HE'S A WARMONGER" in a matter of hours, BACK WITH MORE SILLIASS BULLSHIT.

THE IRANIANS DO NOT HAVE ANYONE ELSE WTH SALEIMANI's TERRORISM EXPERIENCE, DIPSHIT, and HOW MANY AMERICANS' BLOOD DOES A TERRORIST HAVE TO HAVE ON HIS HANDS, BEFORE KILLING HIM IS A "GOOD IDEA" IN LYINGASS LEFTGOOFYWORLD...
Click to expand...

According to the White House this has nothing to do with the embassy bombings so I was correct.
 
With the 52 targets already locked in dare, it appears to me Trump is begging for war.
Therefore I think he is motivated by personal interest.
 
Jarod said:
Who here thinks the Iranians are going to replace the guy Trump killed with someone more friendly to the United States?


So then what was accomplished?
Click to expand...

We can all speculate. My guess is that the ' accomplishment ' was simply a threat of war, which is calculated to assist in escape from the political quagmire that both Trump and Netanyahu are bogged down in. That's not all, of course.
Another ' accomplishment ' worth murdering for is , by means of domestic uncertainty, to prevent Turkey from deploying an army to Libya. Erdogan intends to support the internationally-recognized government in Libya with a view to jointly exploiting the vast mineral ' wealth' off the Libyan coast. Izrael is apoplectic. I'll know if I'm correct if Turkey halts, or delays, the deployment. Of course, if it doesn't then that could simply mean that the US/Izraeli scheme has failed.

Speculation. Whatever- this hasn't been thought through. I don't doubt Izrael's hand in any assassination- but the ' collateral ' murder of the Iraqi parliamentarian has already caused rocket attacks on the US embassy compound in Baghdad. The removal of US forces from Iraq will hand the country to Iran, Russia and Turkey- and the Iraqis just might insist that it's now time for.......

YANQUI- GO HOME .
 
Last edited:
volksreck;
giphy.gif


Kill him too!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Trump* said he did this to prevent a war. Silly. Iran is not a rational actor, they do not respond without escalation.

Trump* will not attack them unless he feel it will help his poll numbers, this attack did not help and he will not do it again. They are not dumb.
Click to expand...

What has Iran done that is irrational?
 
Cypress said:
The evidence you war mongering Neocons have presented that this Solemani dude was a threat to the United States is razor thin and mostly based on conjecture, opinion, and assertion.

After the Iraq War debacle, and due to the fact Trump is a known pathological liar, I see no reason to take your or Trump's word on the dire necessity of this assassination
Click to expand...
you cannot be this stupid/ Do you even get what the Quds force is? and don't hand me this shit about the Iraq war.
I have told you 1000x I was opposed to it, and if you read any of my posts I am against interventionism, Libya included

Solemani was a U.S. designated terrorist as far back as 2005. this is basic stuff.
He was Iran's FM of terrorism
 
Nordberg said:
Might be more qualified. He may be more strident.Trump did not know or care. He had a star to kill.
Click to expand...

I don't favor U. S. intervention in other nations, but if we are going to have troops there I wouldn't think we would want growing Iranian influence and attacks on American troops and bases in Iraq. Knocking out their leadership would seem a reasonable step to prevent that. I know Iraq has large protests against Iranian influence.

Do you think anything should be done against Iranian expansion into Iraq? Is it ok to protect those troops as long as we don't hurt anybody popular?
 
Jarod said:
Who here thinks the Iranians are going to replace the guy Trump killed with someone more friendly to the United States?


So then what was accomplished?
Click to expand...

:facepalm:

What do you mean nothing was "accomplished"? But nothing will ever really be "accomplished" over there until those hot heads lay off the islam. When you kill or capture a drug cartel kingpin, do you just tell the feds to disband?
 
Jarod said:
Who here thinks the Iranians are going to replace the guy Trump killed with someone more friendly to the United States?


So then what was accomplished?
Click to expand...

Did you think Al Queda was going to replace the guy Obama killed with someone more friendly with the United States?

So then what was accomplished?

Did you ask this question then?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top