Who knew that libtards supported Trickle Down Economics

Bijou said:
I push the button, it dances on cue....

You're too funny, Alias!

Nothing more is needed from Hazel, doofus - your ass done got owned on Page One.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Really? Specifically describe in detail how that happened? How did he disprove what I said? He merely said "you are wrong" without any substantiation. Now for high school dropouts like yourself that might be enough, but for those of us who have multiple degrees of higher learning; we require a higher burden of proof.

It isn't surprising that you impress so easily Twatly Dum, you did after all support OWEdummyfucker

:rofl2:
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Yep, the leg humper just wants to throw around snarky comments and build up straw men to try to knock them down.

Lets review for the newest retard who claims to be a "moderate" :rofl2:

1) Bernanke's monetary policy hurts the elderly. If you disagree, then state why or STFU

2) Bernanke's monetary policy amounts to what libtards call trickle down economics (not my term theirs) because it benefits the rich not the poor who libtards claim to champion.

Now, lets remember, you jumped on this thread with some nonsense about me claiming Uncle Ben was partisan. Once I shoved that straw man up your ass, you retreated to some other nonsense. You can claim I don't know what I am talking about, but unless you can explain why in economic terms you are doing nothing but bloviating.

And the fact that you "show friends" what you post on a message board takes loserville to a whole new level.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Damn. I really thought you had it in you to swing for the comedy fence and give us some gold.

And, you missed the point, I wanted to share with my friends what YOU posted... I was going to call it "Letters from Redneckistan" or "Fringe Logic".

Wasn't it some Reagan economists who first used the term "trickle down economics"--stealing the idea from a Will Rogers quote that was meant to be ironic.

However, you now want to attribute both the term and supply-side theory to liberals.

I'm sure you meant that in the classic liberal tradition...
 
hazlnut said:
Damn. I really thought you had it in you to swing for the comedy fence and give us some gold.

And, you missed the point, I wanted to share with my friends what YOU posted... I was going to call it "Letters from Redneckistan" or "Fringe Logic".

Wasn't it some Reagan economists who first used the term "trickle down economics"--stealing the idea from a Will Rogers quote that was meant to be ironic.

However, you now want to attribute both the term and supply-side theory to liberals.

I'm sure you meant that in the classic liberal tradition...
Click to expand...

So 'tea baggers' wasn't their first branding error, obviously...

:rofl2:
 
hazlnut said:
Damn. I really thought you had it in you to swing for the comedy fence and give us some gold.

And, you missed the point, I wanted to share with my friends what YOU posted... I was going to call it "Letters from Redneckistan" or "Fringe Logic".

Wasn't it some Reagan economists who first used the term "trickle down economics"--stealing the idea from a Will Rogers quote that was meant to be ironic.

However, you now want to attribute both the term and supply-side theory to liberals.

I'm sure you meant that in the classic liberal tradition...
Click to expand...

Come on Peanut explain how I am wrong about Uncle Bens monetary policy negatively impacting elderly people. Come on. Don't be a pussy and hide. Here is your chance to show off your chops in front of everyone.

Come on. Do it already. Stop being a pussy. Do it already. Your new girlfriend Bijou is watching. Maybe she will ask you to the JPP prom afterward.

Bring it on bitch. I am waiting

TICK TOCK
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Come on Peanut explain how I am wrong about Uncle Bens monetary policy negatively impacting elderly people. Come on. Don't be a pussy and hide. Here is your chance to show off your chops in front of everyone.

Come on. Do it already. Stop being a pussy. Do it already. Your new girlfriend Bijou is watching. Maybe she will ask you to the JPP prom afterward.

Bring it on bitch. I am waiting

TICK TOCK
Click to expand...

Yes, Hazel. Poor Alias here is waiting to be tutored in Econ 101. He's oblivious to the fact that the facts he's asking for have already been provided. Humour him with a crumb or two!

:rofl2:
 
Bijou said:
Yes, Hazel. Poor Alias here is waiting to be tutored in Econ 101. He's oblivious to the fact that the facts he's asking for have already been provided. Humour him with a crumb or two!

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Oh looky Snooki the high school dropout has turned into a cheerleader for her new online boyfriend Peanut.

Repeat after me Twatly Dum: FRICKER FRACKER FIRECRACKER SIS BOOM BA HAZLNUT HAZLNUT RAH RAH RAH

:rofl2:

Is this how your relationship with Alias started? He came to the board and you desperate for male attention started cheering his posts? Then one day you PMd him one of your glamour shots pictures and seeing that you are a snickers bar away from 260 pounds he ran the other way leaving you scorned and bitter?

That about sum it up puddin?
 
Hey Snooki, I think your new boyfriend Peanut just ran off. You should pick your boyfriends better.

Have you ever tried Its Just Lunch? I know that would mean getting your 300 pound ass off the couch, but come on sweety
 
hazlnut said:
Damn. I really thought you had it in you to swing for the comedy fence and give us some gold.

And, you missed the point, I wanted to share with my friends what YOU posted... I was going to call it "Letters from Redneckistan" or "Fringe Logic".

Wasn't it some Reagan economists who first used the term "trickle down economics"--stealing the idea from a Will Rogers quote that was meant to be ironic.

However, you now want to attribute both the term and supply-side theory to liberals.

I'm sure you meant that in the classic liberal tradition...
Click to expand...

Come on peanut, where did you run off to? I did find a picture of you. Your new girlfriend sent it to me :rofl2:

ImageUploadedByTapatalk HD1347933996.015751.jpg
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Come on Peanut explain how I am wrong about Uncle Bens monetary policy negatively impacting elderly people. Come on. Don't be a pussy and hide. Here is your chance to show off your chops in front of everyone.

Come on. Do it already. Stop being a pussy. Do it already. Your new girlfriend Bijou is watching. Maybe she will ask you to the JPP prom afterward.

Bring it on bitch. I am waiting

TICK TOCK
Click to expand...

Fair enough:

First, define what you mean by "Uncle Bens monetary policy" - because none of your posts indicate you actually understand what the continued quantitative easing policy actually means.

Then, explain what you mean by "negatively impacting elderly people" -- negative how? Is there going to be a run on prune juice futures?

Ya see, sport, all you've said this entire thread is the equivalent of: I will not eat green eggs and ham. Sam I am. And you want me to explain why you will not eat them in a box. I have no f-ing clue what's going on in your head or how you tangled up and completely misunderstood a current economic issue. That's all you bud. In order to solve your riddle of idiocy, I have to separate my brain from my education, turn off all critical thinking, and reject reason.

Let's review:

**You start out implying a continued fed policy designed to stimulate hiring is negative or bad because it only helps the wealthy people at the top. And Democrats who are not screaming objections are somehow agreeing with "Trickle-Down" economics which, according to you, is their term.
**But you also imply that this Fed policy is bad because it doesn't help the underclass and somehow negatively impacts the elderly, ergo, the Dems are screwing over the people they supposedly stand up for. ((Which implies Bernanke is a Dem. See how that works, tiger?)

The whole premise of your OP seems to be "Ah-ha, I caught you Dems liking something you're not supposed to like." Bully for you.:rolleyes:

Basically, you're wrong because you haven't said anything right. You're connecting the dots on two different puzzles. You copy/pasted something you read about QE3, then later in the thread, rambled on about low, low, low interest loans. You jump from buying up of assets to the discount window, to rich people benefiting and grandma getting the shaft. We all know that you're copy/pasting bits and pieces of some conservative blog, trying very desperately to sound intelligent. We know these are not your words or your own understanding of the issue because when you go off book and try to paraphrase, you sound like an idiot. And, like the failed Governor of Alaska, you just start making shit up. If I were to guess, I think you've got it in your head that retired people are hurt by supply-side theory because they don't have jobs. But we could speculate all night on how you got lost. Bottom line, you started for the airport, and drove off a pier.

Moron.

You are a imbecile. Your attempt to sound smart is pathetic, and I've just made you my bitch.

How's it feel up there, nancy?
 
hazlnut said:
Fair enough:

First, define what you mean by "Uncle Bens monetary policy" - because none of your posts indicate you actually understand what the continued quantitative easing policy actually means.

Then, explain what you mean by "negatively impacting elderly people" -- negative how? Is there going to be a run on prune juice futures?

Ya see, sport, all you've said this entire thread is the equivalent of: I will not eat green eggs and ham. Sam I am. And you want me to explain why you will not eat them in a box. I have no f-ing clue what's going on in your head or how you tangled up and completely misunderstood a current economic issue. That's all you bud. In order to solve your riddle of idiocy, I have to separate my brain from my education, turn off all critical thinking, and reject reason.

Let's review:

**You start out implying a continued fed policy designed to stimulate hiring is negative or bad because it only helps the wealthy people at the top. And Democrats who are not screaming objections are somehow agreeing with "Trickle-Down" economics which, according to you, is their term.
**But you also imply that this Fed policy is bad because it doesn't help the underclass and somehow negatively impacts the elderly, ergo, the Dems are screwing over the people they supposedly stand up for. ((Which implies Bernanke is a Dem. See how that works, tiger?)

The whole premise of your OP seems to be "Ah-ha, I caught you Dems liking something you're not supposed to like." Bully for you.:rolleyes:

Basically, you're wrong because you haven't said anything right. You're connecting the dots on two different puzzles. You copy/pasted something you read about QE3, then later in the thread, rambled on about low, low, low interest loans. You jump from buying up of assets to the discount window, to rich people benefiting and grandma getting the shaft. We all know that you're copy/pasting bits and pieces of some conservative blog, trying very desperately to sound intelligent. We know these are not your words or your own understanding of the issue because when you go off book and try to paraphrase, you sound like an idiot. And, like the failed Governor of Alaska, you just start making shit up. If I were to guess, I think you've got it in your head that retired people are hurt by supply-side theory because they don't have jobs. But we could speculate all night on how you got lost. Bottom line, you started for the airport, and drove off a pier.

Moron.

You are a imbecile. Your attempt to sound smart is pathetic, and I've just made you my bitch.

How's it feel up there, nancy?
Click to expand...

Holy shit! Where the hell have you been all my life??

:lol:
 
hazlnut said:
Fair enough:

First, define what you mean by "Uncle Bens monetary policy" - because none of your posts indicate you actually understand what the continued quantitative easing policy actually means.

Then, explain what you mean by "negatively impacting elderly people" -- negative how? Is there going to be a run on prune juice futures?

Ya see, sport, all you've said this entire thread is the equivalent of: I will not eat green eggs and ham. Sam I am. And you want me to explain why you will not eat them in a box. I have no f-ing clue what's going on in your head or how you tangled up and completely misunderstood a current economic issue. That's all you bud. In order to solve your riddle of idiocy, I have to separate my brain from my education, turn off all critical thinking, and reject reason.

Let's review:

**You start out implying a continued fed policy designed to stimulate hiring is negative or bad because it only helps the wealthy people at the top. And Democrats who are not screaming objections are somehow agreeing with "Trickle-Down" economics which, according to you, is their term.
**But you also imply that this Fed policy is bad because it doesn't help the underclass and somehow negatively impacts the elderly, ergo, the Dems are screwing over the people they supposedly stand up for. ((Which implies Bernanke is a Dem. See how that works, tiger?)

The whole premise of your OP seems to be "Ah-ha, I caught you Dems liking something you're not supposed to like." Bully for you.:rolleyes:

Basically, you're wrong because you haven't said anything right. You're connecting the dots on two different puzzles. You copy/pasted something you read about QE3, then later in the thread, rambled on about low, low, low interest loans. You jump from buying up of assets to the discount window, to rich people benefiting and grandma getting the shaft. We all know that you're copy/pasting bits and pieces of some conservative blog, trying very desperately to sound intelligent. We know these are not your words or your own understanding of the issue because when you go off book and try to paraphrase, you sound like an idiot. And, like the failed Governor of Alaska, you just start making shit up. If I were to guess, I think you've got it in your head that retired people are hurt by supply-side theory because they don't have jobs. But we could speculate all night on how you got lost. Bottom line, you started for the airport, and drove off a pier.

Moron.

You are a imbecile. Your attempt to sound smart is pathetic, and I've just made you my bitch.

How's it feel up there, nancy?
Click to expand...

Welcome back Howie :)

:rofl2:

Did you have to be so obvious out of the gate? I knew there was something familiar bout you and this last post sealed it.

But, allow me to school your dumb ass one last time before you go on perma ignore and create another personna.

Fed produces money out of thin air to purchase debt. The money supply is increased. When those mortgage backed securities are purchased, who is benefitted? Is it the poor? Not a chance. Nope, it is the wealthy.

Along with the quantitative easing, money printin for those you in Rio Linda we have Uncle Ben keeping interest rates artificially low heading into at least 2015. How does that hurt the elderly? Simple you queer dumb fuck. They are more likely to rely on fixed income like CDs, money markets etc and they are getting killed. Add on top of that the negative effect Uncle Bens monetary policy has on things the elderly purchase like gasoline and food and you have income going down and expenses going up. Maybe you have a different definition of getting fucked Howie, but the elderly aren't even getting kissed first.

Oh yeah, you say "if you pull out food and energy, there isn't any inflation". Except in the real world and not Lady Gaga world where you live people have to buy food and energy.

Now I understand that the toxoplasmosis is wreaking havoc with your brain, so I am attempting to be charitable. But please stop pushing your luck. Next time you pretend to be someone else, try not to be so obvious.

Now it is back to iggynore for you where all the queers go. Don't bother responding, because I won't even see it

Toddles bitch
 
Bijou said:
Holy shit! Where the hell have you been all my life??

:lol:
Click to expand...

I think I'm jealous!

FactsRStubborn said:
Welcome back Howie :)

:rofl2:

Did you have to be so obvious out of the gate? I knew there was something familiar bout you and this last post sealed it.

But, allow me to school your dumb ass one last time before you go on perma ignore and create another personna.

Fed produces money out of thin air to purchase debt. The money supply is increased. When those mortgage backed securities are purchased, who is benefitted? Is it the poor? Not a chance. Nope, it is the wealthy.

Along with the quantitative easing, money printin for those you in Rio Linda we have Uncle Ben keeping interest rates artificially low heading into at least 2015. How does that hurt the elderly? Simple you queer dumb fuck. They are more likely to rely on fixed income like CDs, money markets etc and they are getting killed. Add on top of that the negative effect Uncle Bens monetary policy has on things the elderly purchase like gasoline and food and you have income going down and expenses going up. Maybe you have a different definition of getting fucked Howie, but the elderly aren't even getting kissed first.

Oh yeah, you say "if you pull out food and energy, there isn't any inflation". Except in the real world and not Lady Gaga world where you live people have to buy food and energy.

Now I understand that the toxoplasmosis is wreaking havoc with your brain, so I am attempting to be charitable. But please stop pushing your luck. Next time you pretend to be someone else, try not to be so obvious.

Now it is back to iggynore for you where all the queers go. Don't bother responding, because I won't even see it

Toddles bitch
Click to expand...

You spelled "toodles" wrong, cunt.

TTFN!
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Don't know his ideological beliefs and don't care. They are not pertinent to this conversation. The topic is how is monetary policy is screwing over the little guy who libtards like OWEbama claim to support. But you don't hear libtards chiming in to denounce his monetary policy.

They either don't understand it, or they support it. Judging by your comment about him being a liberal, I can only surmise that in your case it is the former.
Click to expand...
This is nothing more than another handout to Wall St.

Bernanke ain't no Liberal, so your premise is...as usual...bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top