Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower?

notice howey conveniently cuts this out:

It hasn’t come down much since that postwar record. It was 24.1 percent of GDP in both fiscal 2010 and 2011. Spending for each of the last three fiscal years was higher than any since 1946.

poor howey....all bluster and no muster

according to howey, because he left this out of his factcheck quote, howey has committed fraud.

TFF
 
Uh-huh. Here's another way to look at it:

As the chart indicates, Nutting arrives at that 1.4% number by assigning 2009—when spending surged nearly 20%—to George W. Bush: “The 2009 fiscal year, which Republicans count as part of Obama’s legacy, began four months before Obama moved into the White House. The major spending decisions in the 2009 fiscal year were made by George W. Bush and the previous Congress. Like a relief pitcher who comes into the game with the bases loaded, Obama came in with a budget in place that called for spending to increase by hundreds of billions of dollars in response to the worst economic and financial calamity in generations.”

Let me complete the metaphor for Nutting: “Then as those runners scored, Obama kept putting more on base.”

Obama chose not to reverse that elevated level of spending; thus he, along with congressional Democrats, are responsible for it. Only by establishing 2009 as the new baseline, something Republican budget hawks like Paul Ryan feared would happen, does Obama come off looking like a tightwad. Obama has turned a one-off surge in spending due to the Great Recession into his permanent New Normal through 2016 and beyond.

It’s as if one of my teenagers crashed our family minivan, and I had to buy a new one. And then, since I liked that new car smell so much, I decided to buy a new van every year for the rest of my life. I would indeed be a reckless spender.


http://marklevinshow.com/goout.asp?...y-the-obama-spending-binge-really-did-happen/
 
I would think that Ford and JFK have a good chance of having low rates, not just because they were in office for short periods, but because they handled the economy well. Neither had huge spending programs comparable to the Great Society or Nixons domestic programs, as well...
 
Back
Top