Who is the real extremist on abortion?

If you don't like it then I suggest you support proper and complete sex education and make birth control available to everyone who wants it instead of all the BS about trying to shame people into complying to a sexless existence unless married...a very strange set of principles those....I would add that all children be supported and educated unless of course you want to decide who keeps these children when they're born, maybe you think mothers should be sequestered until the child is born and then taken to be given to 'good christian' homes.
 
??....are you denying you've said that?......

Said what? That you talk craziness? No, I don't deny it. You're a lying, crazy talking wacko.

If you’re asking if I said, “we should kill them because they would be unhappy" then, yes, I am denying I ever said that.

I want to see the quote. You don’t get away with “15 people know” or “it’s all over the boards” or any other lying bullsh!t. You have established yourself as a liar. I have posted the evidence so those interested can verify. Either produce the evidence or I shall chalk this up to being just another one of your lies.
 
If you don't like it then I suggest you support proper and complete sex education and make birth control available to everyone who wants it instead of all the BS about trying to shame people into complying to a sexless existence unless married...a very strange set of principles those....I would add that all children be supported and educated unless of course you want to decide who keeps these children when they're born, maybe you think mothers should be sequestered until the child is born and then taken to be given to 'good christian' homes.
First I would like to say that I personally do support all contraceptives and sexual education. Second, I wonder what your definition of strange is. Because all across the world threw many century spanning cultures, sex before wedlock is taboo. Third children whom are born yes I believe should be supported and educated. Fourth, abandoned children and orphan's should have much thought put into where they will end up permanently. Your words make me wonder on the human condition.. No wait I meant your mental condition.
 
That's what happens when you're saturated with something - it either desensitizes you; or it over-sensitizes you.

The ignore function does a great job of keeping the stench to a minimum, though.

well, it's true you're both saturated with bullshit....
 
If you don't like it then I suggest you support proper and complete sex education and make birth control available to everyone who wants it instead of all the BS about trying to shame people into complying to a sexless existence unless married...a very strange set of principles those....I would add that all children be supported and educated unless of course you want to decide who keeps these children when they're born, maybe you think mothers should be sequestered until the child is born and then taken to be given to 'good christian' homes.

since all of that is already in place we only need one final step......stop killing unborn children.....
 
Said what? That you talk craziness? No, I don't deny it. You're a lying, crazy talking wacko.

If you’re asking if I said, “we should kill them because they would be unhappy" then, yes, I am denying I ever said that.

I want to see the quote. You don’t get away with “15 people know” or “it’s all over the boards” or any other lying bullsh!t. You have established yourself as a liar. I have posted the evidence so those interested can verify. Either produce the evidence or I shall chalk this up to being just another one of your lies.

lol.....we have evidence on both issues.....which leaves you shining in a bad light.....
 
lol....no dipshit....I'm not.....I suggest you go back and review what really happened on that thread.....you've been having delusions about it for months....you tried to pretend that someone was attempting it NOW because it had happened once in the early 1800s......fucking stupid, but true....

no law has ever been passed and no law will ever be passed and no law will ever be proposed to be passed

Is English your second language or third language? no law has ever been passed Do you understand the meaning of that statement? Rhetorical question because obviously you do not. Regardless of what you incorrectly thought I was pretending your statement stands on it's own and it's a lie. You lied. You were not merely mistaken because when \\()// brought it to your attention you continued to defend the lie and you are continuing to do so. Consequently, you are a liar. Furthermore, your continued defense of the lie coupled with not apologizing to \\()// shows you to be a spoiled adolescent, far from being a man.

she's no lady, she's a lying bitch....

The behavior you show towards women is characteristic of someone who had their balls busted by a gal in the past. Is there something you need to share, PMP? We're listening......

 
Well, sure! Now that I know you're an ignorant asshole, I'll be happy to put you on ignore. :) NO problem.

I see you're meeting the lunatic fringe. On the whole it's not really too bad. I like to think of the group as my dysfunctional web family although we do tend to have an abnormlly high number of wackos.

Welcome to JPP! :lol:
 
because that is about five months. That is only around the time that, you know they are fully formed living beings and is the late cut off to the Legal abortion . I do understand its my opinion that abortion is horrid murder.. but I think the other side of the coin is through hefty desensitizing of certain points of humanity... Even forty years ago if you described the act and all of the relevent data a non christian would have reacted with horror. See there are hundreds of family's looking to adopt , programs and agency's that will care for a child.. but the right to kill the child if you have one when you dont think you are ready or if you are have too many offspring " MUST" be protected.

"there are hundreds of family's looking to adopt , programs and agency's that will care for a child"

That may be so today but don't forget that outlawing abortion would result in over one million additional babies each and every year. I suggest you research adoption agencies and orphanages in the past, agencies that ran before legalized abortion. It's not a pretty picture. There are also documentaries interviewing today's adults who were "wards of the State". Sexual and psychological abuse was rampant.

The interviewees, then children, recalled being scorned because they were not chosen for adoption. As they grew older and saw younger children being adopted the idea no one wanted them became instilled in their mind. They had no self-esteem which, among other things, led many to accept abusive relationshps later in life. To many, it was better to be wanted and abused than not wanted at all.

Like anything else if abortion was outlawed the "market" would be flooded with children and we already know how some people think of children. (Let's teach them the work ethic by having them clean school toilets.)

Also, children were a desired commodity in the past due to the rural lifestyle. An additional pair of hands, regardless of size, were an asset on the family farm. Then there were the household chores before electric stoves and diswashers and other labor saving devices. Small hands could bring in stove wood and wash dishes, feed the chickens, weed the garden and sort apples. There was no shortage of child labor jobs. And when it came to temporary fostering governments would supply a stipend. Not only free labor but a little cash, too.

A neighbor I grew up with was fostered for a number of years. Never legally adopted. Never accepted into the family. Bullied by the sons of the couple. Even at age 10 or 12 I was able to emphasize as it was obvious he had little joy in his life. He's dead now. Helicopter crash in northern BC, I'm told.

Abortion is not a pleasant event but neither is a life of hell.

If you haven't looked into orphanages and seen interviews of the adults, who as children experienced it, I suggest you do so. Then consider society's views, today, towards the poor and those with emotional problems.
 
First I would like to say that I personally do support all contraceptives and sexual education. Second, I wonder what your definition of strange is. Because all across the world threw many century spanning cultures, sex before wedlock is taboo. Third children whom are born yes I believe should be supported and educated. Fourth, abandoned children and orphan's should have much thought put into where they will end up permanently. Your words make me wonder on the human condition.. No wait I meant your mental condition.
Sex education in school and free contraceptions and medical care plus support for education and you can keep the rest. Your pushing another religious agenda....or another religious agenda pusher...either way we have a secular government for a reason, it was set up to be secular because historically when government is contaminated by religion it goes bad. You can't legislate morality or sexual practices...and you have no business in anyone elses' bedroom or uterus. Pay attention to your own self for a change.
 
Again, no cite. No proof. Just another PiMP lie.

This is getting old. :(

But at least the retard's getting your attention. That's all he's after; one need only read his pitiful bitterness towards women and his obsession with abortion to know that he's 'one of those' from the Church of Nutjob; in other words, very, very lonely.
 
Back
Top