Gondwanaland
Verified User
Because he has one son, born in 2020. You think that looks like a two year old, you dumbfuck?
Who is that behind him? Disturbing picture emerges of Hunter Bidcen
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
Because he has one son, born in 2020. You think that looks like a two year old, you dumbfuck?
I'm curious whose son the kid is...given it's a male child. Again, why aren't the Trumpers giving more context to their accusations? I have more evidence Trump is still molesting little girls than they do of Hunter's sex crimes.
How many sons does he have....One? and the kid is around 2
So the person in the pic is NOT his son!
That you know of, dumbass. He's rich. Who's to say that isn't his second or third family?
Where is the evidence, dumbfuck???
I am still waiting on proof that it isn't photoshopped. If it isn't, I am waiting on proof that it's a little boy.
If he is, in fact, a little boy, then his mother more than likely took the picture.
Publicly, dumbass, known publicy. Are you really certain a scumbag like Hunter Bided or Jerry Falwell Jr aren't paying off women who had their kids?
Obviously you haven't fucked around too much. That's what you get when you hang out with Nazi douchebags instead of going where the women are.
Do you have odd attractions to the men in your cell, group, unit, club or whatever you call it?
Sawyerloggingon
Verified User
Yeah it kinda is. You can't sexually exploit a minor just because they are your child
Whos to say it not some boy he met online?
First you have to prove he was sexually exploiting a minor.
Agreed.
The evidence is all in the child. Who is it?
Agreed, it's likely the mother took the picture.
Sawyerloggingon
Verified User
Looks too old to be his son anyway so it's a moot point. Something very wrong is depicted in this photo.
Sawyerloggingon
Verified User
Maybe this mom.
"A Georgia mother accused of selling her two young daughters to be raped has entered a guilty plea on the same day the man accused of raping them was convicted."
https://www.wrdw.com
Yep. The context is missing.
Sawyerloggingon
Verified User
A naked man taking a selfie with a child is context enough.
Yup
That would have the avg mans phones and all computers seized and a full kiddie porn investigation started
BTW, how the fuck did he take a selfie when he didn't have a phone in his hand?
...in their jammies. I think some people are reading far too much into a picture with so little facts associated with it. Why would they do that?
Wait a minute.... if he did take a selfie then how did he appear in the mirror at that angle?