Mott the Hoople Sweet Jane Aug 10, 2008 #41 Watermark said: Good post Mott. Click to expand... Thank you.
Minister of Truth Practically Perfect Aug 10, 2008 #42 Mottleydude said: I oppose intelligent design, as an objective scientist, because it provides so little, if anything, of value to science. It has no practical use. Click to expand... Scientific knowledge or technology? I take it you prefer a science which yields atomic bombs and air conditioners.
Mottleydude said: I oppose intelligent design, as an objective scientist, because it provides so little, if anything, of value to science. It has no practical use. Click to expand... Scientific knowledge or technology? I take it you prefer a science which yields atomic bombs and air conditioners.