Who do you think is responsible for the latest Session/Russians revelations?


I'm intuitively suspicious of so called fact checkers.

At any rate, Snopes conceded that money flowed to the Clinton Foundation---from the chairman of Uranium One.
_______

His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said. [Snopes]

Basically, Snopes believes Tefler that there was no quid pro quo and he gave 2 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation simply because he's a do-gooder.

Snopes may be a fact checker, but they are a gullible fact checker.
 
Maybe, they should, you seem to think I am against discovery of all things nefarious, I am not, doesn't matter which side is playing the game.

its not that we think your against discovering all things nefarious.......its that you pretend the current goal is to discover nefarious things.......
 
Back
Top