White Nationalist?

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
I posted this in another thread, but the Con's roundly ignored it..... I think it deserves its own thread to make it harder for them to ignore.


A white nationalist is a person who believes that White People are genetically superior to other races and deserve special treatment by society, culture and Government. This is bad because it breeds into our nation and world a structure that promotes people based on race rather than ability, we end up with the less competent managing and running the more competent. It becomes a mark on our ability to compete in the world markets and fails to make use of the best of our culture and society. It is also bad because it is fundamentally unfair to those who have a greater ability but are not part of the favored group. It is bad for our culture and society because it breeds generations of resentment and inequity that cannot be corrected without generations of balancing of financial equity to bring the underclass that was created back to an equitable position.


What do you think, am I wrong?
Are you a White Nationalist? If so, explain it to me...
 
You libs are like barking dogs: "Ruff Racist! Ruff Ruff, Bigot!, Ruff Homophobe, Ruff ruff, Islamophobe."

That's all you people have, and its pathetic. Works good for keeping black racists in the party like BAC. But the rest of the moderates are leaving in droves.
 
Irish said:
You libs are like barking dogs: "Ruff Racist! Ruff Ruff, Bigot!, Ruff Homophobe, Ruff ruff, Islamophobe."

That's all you people have, and its pathetic. Works good for keeping black racists in the party like BAC. But the rest of the moderates are leaving in droves.
Click to expand...

So, I guess I can mark you down as not being a white nationalist?
 
where do you get this stuff? Is it the same as white supremacists? OK fine..

get back to me when you wanna talk about economic nationalism..you know..what the entire world practices
 
anatta said:
where do you get this stuff? Is it the same as white supremacists? OK fine..

get back to me when you wanna talk about economic nationalism..you know..what the entire world practices
Click to expand...

So, you don't want to talk about White Nationalists? I understand.... That's what I figured.

Im have a thread planned about Nationalists later... that will include economic nationalists. We can talk then. BTW you are wrong when you claim the rest of the world practices Economic Nationalism, mostly its the third world, China and to some extent Russia. Most of Europe, and most of the Americas's don't do it.
 
anatta said:
where do you get this stuff? Is it the same as white supremacists? OK fine..

get back to me when you wanna talk about economic nationalism..you know..what the entire world practices
Click to expand...

Economic Nationalist? Hah! Liberals would rather the US implode into a 3rd world country. That way its "fair."
 
Jarod said:
So, you don't want to talk about White Nationalists? I understand.... That's what I figured.

Im have a thread planned about Nationalists later... that will include economic nationalists. We can talk then. BTW you are wrong when you claim the rest of the world practices Economic Nationalism, mostly its the third world, China and to some extent Russia. Most of Europe, and most of the Americas's don't do it.
Click to expand...
you'd have to define the terms -but i don't see any point in "white nationalism" -why even go there?
as I mentioned white supremecy is another subject.

Anyways..globalization is well understood as economic "world is flat" and everybody competes with everyone else.
I am a lot more concerned with China /India trade policies and outsourcing, and if that is the extent of how it's addressed -that's a lot better then it is now.
 
anatta said:
you'd have to define the terms -but i don't see any point in "white nationalism" -why even go there?
as I mentioned white supremecy is another subject.

Anyways..globalization is well understood as economic "world is flat" and everybody competes with everyone else.
I am a lot more concerned with China /India trade policies and outsourcing, and if that is the extent of how it's addressed -that's a lot better then it is now.
Click to expand...

I was asked to define it by a Con in another thread, but everyone refused to discuss the topic after I defined it, I figured you would be uncomfortable with it.

You keep trying to change the subject to "Economic Nationalism" Which I have also defined in another thread.. but I am still trying to get someone to discuss this first.
 
I have a friend I grew up with, his parents were both members of the Black Panther Party in Oakland back in the day. He argues integration was bad for black folks because it tore apart black businesses and that was the plan of the white man. He says other communities, such as the Koreans and Chinese, have their own neighborhood's with their own businesses and spend their money among each other. He says the black community needs that. He says they need their own schools and black businesses where blacks can spend their money among each other.

I don't know if that's considered black nationalism or not but it's an interesting argument.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
I posted this in another thread, but the Con's roundly ignored it..... I think it deserves its own thread to make it harder for them to ignore.
Click to expand...

Another massive lie from the Liberal liar; Cons roundly slapped you around when you made that asinine and false claim that the White Nationalists were determining White House policy you lying dunce.

Why do Liberals think they can just lie at will and not get their asses kicked with it?

But then, like a retard, you didn't get bitch slapped enough in that thread so you start another moronically thinking it will have a different result. How fucking retarded are you?
 
cawacko said:
I have a friend I grew up with, his parents were both members of the Black Panther Party in Oakland back in the day. He argues integration was bad for black folks because it tore apart black businesses and that was the plan of the white man. He says other communities, such as the Koreans and Chinese, have their own neighborhood's with their own businesses and spend their money among each other. He says the black community needs that. He says they need their own schools and black businesses where blacks can spend their money among each other.

I don't know if that's considered black nationalism or not.
Click to expand...

I would say so... and I think Koreans and Chinese should integrate also. Its my observation that these groups do integrate after a generation or so, at least that's what happened with the Cubans around here.
 
anatta said:
where do you get this stuff? Is it the same as white supremacists? OK fine..

get back to me when you wanna talk about economic nationalism..you know..what the entire world practices
Click to expand...

It's easy; he makes the shit up. On the other thread he stupidly claimed that White Nationalists were dictating White House policy.....then when he got thoroughly bitch slapped by it, switched it to defining what White Nationalism is all about as if it made his previously asinine claim any less asinine.
 
So nobody willing to discuss except Cawacko pointing out that something similar to Black Nationalism exists?
 
Jarod said:
I would say so... and I think Koreans and Chinese should integrate also. Its my observation that these groups do integrate after a generation or so, at least that's what happened with the Cubans around here.
Click to expand...

Just asking, is it white privilege to say they should integrate? We used to call America a melting pot and now in California it's considered a micro aggression to use that term. So if ethnic groups want to seperate that should acceptable in P.C. world right?
 
Irish said:
You libs are like barking dogs: "Ruff Racist! Ruff Ruff, Bigot!, Ruff Homophobe, Ruff ruff, Islamophobe."

That's all you people have, and its pathetic. Works good for keeping black racists in the party like BAC. But the rest of the moderates are leaving in droves.
Click to expand...

Well, right off the bat, there's ONE poster who can't answer Jarod's very straight forward question.

I wonder why that is?
 
Jarod said:
I posted this in another thread, but the Con's roundly ignored it..... I think it deserves its own thread to make it harder for them to ignore.


A white nationalist is a person who believes that White People are genetically superior to other races and deserve special treatment by society, culture and Government. This is bad because it breeds into our nation and world a structure that promotes people based on race rather than ability, we end up with the less competent managing and running the more competent. It becomes a mark on our ability to compete in the world markets and fails to make use of the best of our culture and society. It is also bad because it is fundamentally unfair to those who have a greater ability but are not part of the favored group. It is bad for our culture and society because it breeds generations of resentment and inequity that cannot be corrected without generations of balancing of financial equity to bring the underclass that was created back to an equitable position.


What do you think, am I wrong?
Are you a White Nationalist? If so, explain it to me...
Click to expand...

I think I'm going to roundly ignore this one too.
 
cawacko said:
Just asking, is it white privilege to say they should integrate? We used to call America a melting pot and now in California it's considered a micro aggression to use that term. So if ethnic groups want to seperate that should acceptable in P.C. world right?
Click to expand...

I think integration is the best option for all of us.

Who said that in California its considered a micro aggression, you?

I don't know if its acceptable in P.C. world, I still don't understand what is meant by P.C., I know Trump whines a lot about things people say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top