virtue signaling: displaying morals
there is a reason you cock noses hate people who display morals
fucking sociopath
virtue signaling: displaying morals
there is a reason you cock noses hate people who display morals
fucking sociopath


virtue signaling: displaying morals
virtue signaling: displaying morals
You have no morals. It's about IMAGE for you rich White POS.
He’s far better than Trump, he’s a great choice, just not the most popular. He is not the best person to beat Trump.If, to the left, Booker is now such a great choice for the position one heartbeat away from the Presidency, why was he polling at 5 - 6% and unable to qualify for the next debate?
He’s far better than Trump, he’s a great choice, just not the most popular. He is not the best person to beat Trump.
Interesting how probably ninety percent of the time that race comes up in a post it is a conservative who introduces it
The "big chiwawa" could have authored that topic without the race element but obviously it wouldn't have gotten the reaction he was hoping for nor seemingly fallen within his understanding of events, guess that is just what happens when you worship a demogogue
Projection, you are the one who qualifies people by skin color, whites only need apply. White males only...For someone to be better than Trump, wouldn't it mean he could beat Trump?
He's just another token black that you lefties will push on skin color in order to get votes.
Projection, you are the one who qualifies people by skin color, whites only need apply. White males only...
A choice supported by blacks, who feel he is the best choice to beat Trump. They know Joe and feel he is a safe choice, acceptable to moderates. It has nothing to do with his color or gender. Meanwhile, women and minorities are killing it in local elections. All good things take time.That's a rather ironic statement being that the top two in the self proclaimed party of diversity are old white males.
I don't see anyone saying Booker - Biden. It's the reverse. An old white guy with a token black.
A choice supported by blacks

Do you really expect more from a poster who uses the photo of a oxycontin drug abuser who brought a suitcase full of Viagra to an island notorious for its underage sex trade as his avatar?

Projection, you are the one who qualifies people by skin color, whites only need apply. White males only...
They were denied based on their skin color, it’s the reason for the rule, once this has been corrected, the law won’t be necessary.To be fair only one of the two parties has a policy wherein you get benefits or preferential treatment in college or jobs if you are a certain skin color
He’s far better than Trump, he’s a great choice, just not the most popular. He is not the best person to beat Trump.
A choice supported by blacks, who feel he is the best choice to beat Trump. They know Joe and feel he is a safe choice, acceptable to moderates. It has nothing to do with his color or gender. Meanwhile, women and minorities are killing it in local elections. All good things take time.![]()
Mine was his enthusiasm and oration skills, I liked his style. This is just your very racist opinion. You vote for people based on the color of their skin, you have no room to talk.It's clear their choice to support Obama was due solely to color. It's no coincidence that their numbers dropped to levels prior to a black guy running. It's clear Booker would get support for the same reason and you want to claim I base my choices on race.