White House to rebrand Pentagon the Department of War

Uncensored2008 said:
Yep - but under the Obama regime we focused on the military as an experiment in transgenderism,



Ah, the military is a waste of money? Hitler, Stalin, Xi, and Kim would protect us - why do we need a military?



LOL - you can't stand that the department of war is back to its purpose and intent. You can spot the difference in the soldiers of each era,

Obama Era
View attachment 58571

Trump Era
View attachment 58570
Click to expand...
Why are you talking about transgender people?
 
signalmankenneth said:
Why stop there? Let’s rename all Depts after what Trump is inflicting on America.

Dept of HHS -> Dept of Hepatitis and Human Suffering
Dept of VA -> Dept of Veteran Abandonment
Dept of Education -> Dept of Erasure of History
Dept of Commerce -> Dept of Corruption

Just a start. - Sen. Tammy Duckworth
Click to expand...
Because they weren't originally called that
 
Calls it dept of War just as he starts to send the military into American cities. He is telling us how he sees the people. They will see force, deadly if he decides, if they do not follow his orders.
 
Nordberg said:
Calls it dept of War just as he starts to send the military into American cities. He is telling us how he sees the people. They will see force, deadly if he decides, if they do not follow his orders.
Click to expand...

Your culture of criminal homeless junky faggots needs more encouragement.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
Hey MAGA rubes



news.yahoo.com

White House to rebrand Pentagon the Department of War

The name change would likely require an act of Congress, although the White House is looking for ways to avoid a vote.
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com
Click to expand...
It was called the Department of War until 1947. Like literally everything else on the MAGA agenda, they want to return the US to the 1940s and 1950s. Separate drinking fountains for niggers. Public executions for fags. Jobless, uneducated women pregnant for 15 years straight. Bottomless martinis at lunch before fucking the secretary before going home to complain about the meal that the pregnant wife cooked while she was painting her face and slipping into high heels to work in her own kitchen. Hillary Clinton was way too kind when she called these Neanderthals deplorables. They are subhuman.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
Hegseth, in a Wednesday interview on Fox News, echoed Trump’s line. “We won World War I, and we won World War II, not with the Department of Defense, but with a War Department, with the Department of War," he said. "As the president has said, we're not just defense, we're offense."

Trump has said he thinks Congress would go along with him. "Defense is too defensive,” he said last month. “And we want to be defensive, but we want to be offensive too if we have to be. So, it just sounded to me like a better name."

Democrats quickly skewered the move. Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.) and several others flicked at the irony of such an aggressive action from a president who reportedly craves the world’s most notable award for peace.
Click to expand...
Do you think he finally wrapped his empty head around the fact that he will never win a Nobel Peace Prize? He HATES Barack Obama for being better than he is. Maybe he's just decided to go 180 degrees, full Satanic and try to be the polar opposite of Obama.
 
AProudLefty said:
Are they telling us to expect a war?
Click to expand...
It's against Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

TACO is preparing for his next coup and the final overthrow of American democracy. He's going to use federal forces to murder Americans who oppose him. There's a reason some of us have been calling him Baby Hitler for years.
 
Nordberg said:
Trump is crazy. How many millions would renaming it cost? The paperwork and computer info would all have to be updated and approved. Every place Defense is referred to would have to be changed. Why? Because Trump has another stupid, wasteful idea.
It is a really dumb idea and the Trumpys will still defend it.
Click to expand...
Anything to continue trying to distract from the Epstein files and his colossal fuckup of the national economy.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I want the US to have an effective foreign policy and if force is necessary as part of that, a military that can carry it out. By your standard, Japan and Germany would have been victorious in WW 2.
Click to expand...
The fuck you do. TACO is the worst foreign policy president in generations. He has no fucking clue what he's doing.
 
volsrocks said:
What was the reason it was tossed?
Click to expand...
You fucking moron.

  1. Unification of the Armed Services
    • After WWII, the U.S. had separate War (Army) and Navy Departments.
    • The National Security Act of 1947 created the National Military Establishment to unify them, and in 1949 it was renamed the Department of Defense.
    • This brought the Army, Navy, and newly established Air Force under a single civilian Secretary.
  2. Modernization and Bureaucratic Clarity
    • “War Department” suggested a single branch (the Army).
    • “Defense” better captured the broader scope of coordinating land, sea, and air forces in a unified structure.
  3. Political and Public Relations Value
    • In the early Cold War, U.S. leaders wanted a less aggressive name.
    • “Department of War” sounded offensive and imperial.
    • “Department of Defense” emphasized protection, deterrence, and security, which fit the postwar strategy of containing the Soviet Union.
  4. Alignment with Strategy
    • The U.S. was shifting from mobilizing only in wartime to maintaining a permanent peacetime military.
    • A new name signaled this new, ongoing defensive posture rather than temporary wartime mobilization.

⚖️ So in short: it was both organizational necessity and a deliberate change in tone — from fighting wars to ensuring national defense.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Oh, another example is the American Civil War. Half the nation (13 states) quit and wanted to form their own country. The union, and War Department (now DoD), went to war and invaded the Confederacy with the intent of crushing it. The Union states didn't need defending in the beginning of that war and if the Union had done nothing there wouldn't have been a war at all. The Confederacy would simply have been a new nation and that would be that. In purely a defensive act, the War Department and Union needed do nothing to defend the remaining loyal US states other than possibly guard the new border.
Click to expand...
You fucking idiot. Do you think the Department of Defense has solely acted defensively since 1947?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top