White House tacitly endorses intimidation of Supreme Court justices
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
ExpressLane
Verified User
The Left doesn't need to follow no stinking laws.
ExpressLane
Verified User
But we have the Ministry of Truth to protect us now!
It appears so...indeed it does.
Even Schumer threatened them.
Justice Roberts is right, he did threatened them.
gemini104104
Verified User
Stalinists , behaving like Stalinists.
Naturally the Pres.Moron Adm. has no problem with this. Cowards, one and all.
A man in buffalo horns prancing around the Capitol building is not "insurrection"; THREATENING THE MEMBERS OF THE SCOTUS WITH VIOLENCE IS.
White House tacitly endorses intimidation of Supreme Court justices
It was a horrific scene at a baseball field in Alexandria, Va. five years ago. Five people were shot while practicing for the annual Congressional Baseball Game for Charity. Among the wounded was Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), who was in critical condition while undergoing several surgeries to stop internal bleeding. Fortunately, he would survive, as would the others who were shot.
~ One would think that our leaders in Washington would have learned from this terrible day and would be doing everything in their power to condemn similar acts of violence from happening again.
But the Biden White House doesn’t seem to care that angry mobs have gone to the homes of six conservative Supreme Court justices to protest the likely overturning of Roe v. Wade after a draft document stating such, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was leaked earlier this week. A liberal firestorm followed, as the overturning of the 1973 decision would send abortion law back to the states.
One liberal group, “Ruth Sent Us,” has published online the home addresses of Justices Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts. Several of these justices have children at home, including Barrett, who has seven.
Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ and immigrant rights. We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics,” the group said earlier this week.
Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy asked White House press secretary Jen Psaki about the planned protests earlier this week.
“Do you think that progressive activists that are now planning protests outside some of the justices’ houses are extreme?” asked Doocy.
“Peaceful protest? No, peaceful protest is not extreme,” Psaki retorted.
“Some of these justices have young kids,” Doocy followed. “Their neighbors are not all public figures. So would the president think about waving off activists who want to go into residential neighborhoods in Virginia and Maryland?”
“I think our view here is that peaceful protests — there’s a long history in the United States, in the country, of that. And we’ve certainly encouraged people to keep it peaceful and not resort to any level of violence,” Psaki replied.
“These activists posted a map with the home addresses of the Supreme Court justice,” Doocy countered. “Is that the kind of thing the president wants to help your side make their point?”
“The president’s view is that there’s a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across this country about what they saw in that leaked document,” Psaki said. “We obviously want people’s privacy to be respected. We want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. That is certainly what the president’s view would be.”
Interesting. Would the White House position be the same if angry pro-life protesters showed up at the private residences of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) or Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) or Psaki’s herself? Almost certainly it would not.
Team Biden should condemn this and urge protesters to make their voices heard at the Supreme Court. Instead, by not condemning it, they are tacitly approving the intimidation of justices at their homes.
And by the way, Title 18, Section 1507 of the United States Code provides an official position of the U.S. government that the press secretary could not provide.
“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=abd4a5c679814c699e0f7be3589e3a78
Actually, the tenacity of the legitimate Biden White House is to hopefully execute executive orders against the seditious repuke enemy from within when it comes to the War Powers Act at dealing with internal enemy combatants and with a forever lasting effect, and with all the justice of seditious evidence at hand, and within all areas that they exist who are at war against America, society, U.S. constitutional law an anything of a civilized nature on Earth:
Article II of the United States Constitution, empowers the President, as Commander in Chief, to direct the use of military force to protect the Nation from an attack or threat of imminent attack and to protect important national interests."
Keeping the Balance: What a President Can Do and Cannot Do
In, particular what the President of the U.S. can do is to take action without Congressional approval to protect the nation against attack, and it does not specify be it foreign or internal attacks on democracy and its society, etc.
https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/three-branches/what-president-can-do-cannot-do
Also, how's about this tRump tacitly at corrupting SCOTUS with unqualified and counterproductive characters that he and his fellow seditious repukes hacked in there to serve his un-American endeavors only:
Trump Keeps Picking Unqualified People To Be Lifetime Judges. Republicans Don't Care.
The GOP has already confirmed five judicial nominees rated "not qualified" by the American Bar Association, and more are coming. Great!
WASHINGTON ― It’s hard to keep up with all of President Donald Trump’s questionable nominees for lifetime federal judgeships.
There was Brett Talley, a 36-year-old lawyer and former paranormal activity investigator who tweeted about Hillary Clinton being “rotten” and said his solution to the Sandy Hook shooting massacre “would be to stop being a society of pansies and man up.” Matthew Petersen, also a 36-year-old lawyer, couldn’t answer basic questions about law in his confirmation hearing and was basically shamed into withdrawing. Jeff Mateer, a 52-year-old lawyer who described transgender children as evidence of “Satan’s plan” and endorsed gay conversion therapy, was eventually withdrawn too.
None of those nominees made it through the Senate confirmation process. But a growing number of Trump’s court picks are slipping through despite earning a rare and embarrassing “not qualified” rating by the nonpartisan American Bar Association. And Republicans are ready to confirm even more of them.
This week alone, two of Trump’s court picks who earned the abysmal ABA rating ― Sarah Pitlyk and Lawrence VanDyke ― inched forward. Pitlyk, a 42-year-old lawyer who previously clerked for then-D.C. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, advanced out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday on a party-line vote. VanDyke, a 46-year-old lawyer who is the former solicitor general of both Nevada and Montana, got his confirmation hearing on Wednesday."
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trum...senate-republicans_n_5dbc7351e4b0fffdb0f674af
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Nasty knob rot, capo di tutti ficchiu
That's a threat?What a bunch of snowflakes.
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere. We’ve got to get the children connected to their parents,” Waters said at the Wilshire Federal Building, according to video of the event.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/25/politics/maxine-waters-trump-officials/index.html
This wasn't a threat either, was it? Fucking moron...
Wow that's a big whataboutism.
Title 18, Section 1507 of the United States Code provides an official position of the U.S. government that the press secretary could not provide.
“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
Truth just slapped you in the face, and you're too naive to see it? Wow is right.
FreeSpeech1789
Banned
They doxxed their addresses and went to their homes this is clear obstruction of justice by intimidation now they and the group that doxxed them should all be arrested but the DOJ/FBI of the unelected illegitimate Biden junta will do nothing so now it is time for we the people to take direct action against these infanticidal pigs.
FreeSpeech1789
Banned
It's not a whataboutism this is what we used to call set standards.
And have now gotten VIOLENT.
VIOLENT INSURRECTION.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
We care about totally different things, Grok.
People with incompatible values are naturally going to care about different things.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
"Ficchiu" isn't a word.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Here's the thing, Grok.
If the correct two-thirds of the SCOTUS were to suddenly disappear, the entire planet would be far better off.
There is no logical argument possible against that supposition.
Isn't the more reasonable thing to discuss is how to deal with those six "people?"
If the correct two-thirds of the SCOTUS were to suddenly disappear, the entire planet would be far better off.
There is no logical argument possible against that supposition.
Isn't the more reasonable thing to discuss is how to deal with those six "people?"