Which oath?

Which oath should be kept?

  • 1

    Votes: 12 57.1%
  • 2

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Neither

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
Still waiting for the proof you have that Oath Keepers are threatening to take the law into their own hands? Provide it or admit you are a lying twit. You and Chris Matthew both shit your lacy panties at the thought of military men and women promising NOT to knock your door down in the middle of the night if so ordered.
 
So, you are an Oaf Keeper?

Denial is your MO. http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/01/22/oath-keepers-chief-denies-accused-rapist-was-member/

I read all about you: "I encourage citizens to get to know their local police officers by name….. Invite your officer’s to a block party…. Have them over for coffee… Let them know that you appreciate the hard job they have."

I am currently busy making sure as many law enforcement professionals as possible see your bro STY's anti-law enforcement rants...

He says he's not a "registered" member, but he sports your logo.

Deal with it.
 
So, you are an Oaf Keeper?

Denial is your MO. http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/01/22/oath-keepers-chief-denies-accused-rapist-was-member/

I read all about you: "I encourage citizens to get to know their local police officers by name….. Invite your officer’s to a block party…. Have them over for coffee… Let them know that you appreciate the hard job they have."

I am currently busy making sure as many law enforcement professionals as possible see your bro STY's anti-law enforcement rants...

He says he's not a "registered" member, but he sports your logo.

Deal with it.
LOL that's all you can come up with? A far left blog site using time worn (and obvious) slander level propaganda headlines?

No, I am not a member of Oath Keepers. The purpose of Oath Keepers is to make an association of those who may, someday, (could even come from a REPUBLICAN administration!) receive illegal orders, in order that they may publicly and continually review and renew their oath to protect the Constitution. I retired from the service after 40 years, therefore I no longer need worry about the potential of receiving an illegal order. I do, however, fully support their intent and purpose. (their REAL purpose, not the lies you make up)

And, as has been said many times, I do not give a ripe pig fart what STY says. STY is not representative of all conservatives. Neither am I. Unlike you whiny lying liberal pussheads who get their daily thought processes from their political masters, conservatives make up their own minds about things, and therefore will express a wide range of opinions about them.

You obviously are completely obsessed with STY. Your SN says it all. What happened? Did he steal your lollipop? Did he call you a nasty name? Did he insult your mommy?

You are the most ignorant, pathetic, whiny loser on these boards, not to mention a piece of shit liar. You are the typical example of the brain dead extremist liberal: you KNOW you cannot defend your liberalism so all you have left is the lies you make up about those you dislike. I've seen 4 year olds with more maturity than you display.
 
Last edited:
really? thanks man. I couldn't ask for better publicity.


you wouldn't be trying to provoke any police 'misconduct' directed towards my person, would you?

I'm glad to be of service.

I've noticed the Oaf Keepers’ website is chock-full of with paranoid fantasies about government officials “disarm[ing] the American people,” “confiscat[ing] the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies,” and “blockad[ing] American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.”

In early 2008, the Oaf Keepers’ founder warned that a “dominatrix-in-chief” named “Hitlery Clinton” would impose a police state on America and shoot all resisters.

After primary voters chose a different candidate, the Oaf Keepers simply rewrote their "hatriot" mantra to focus on an African-American target.
 
hey hey, I was wondering when some idiot obama supporter would bring out the 'hatriot' word. I was beginning to lose faith in you talking point morons.
 
LOL that's all you can come up with? A far left blog site using time worn (and obvious) slander level propaganda headlines?

No, I am not a member of Oath Keepers. The purpose of Oath Keepers is to make an association of those who may, someday, (could even come from a REPUBLICAN administration!) receive illegal orders, in order that they may publicly and continually review and renew their oath to protect the Constitution. I retired from the service after 40 years, therefore I no longer need worry about the potential of receiving an illegal order. I do, however, fully support their intent and purpose. (their REAL purpose, not the lies you make up)

And, as has been said many times, I do not give a ripe pig fart what STY says. STY is not representative of all conservatives. Neither am I. Unlike you whiny lying liberal pussheads who get their daily thought processes from their political masters, conservatives make up their own minds about things, and therefore will express a wide range of opinions about them.

You obviously are completely obsessed with STY. Your SN says it all. What happened? Did he steal your lollipop? Did he call you a nasty name? Did he insult your mommy?

You are the most ignorant, pathetic, whiny loser on these boards, not to mention a piece of shit liar. You are the typical example of the brain dead extremist liberal: you KNOW you cannot defend your liberalism so all you have left is the lies you make up about those you dislike. I've seen 4 year olds with more maturity than you display.

Just a few observations:

I noticed you didn't provide any factual basis for your denial of SPLC's description of the Oaf Keepers, who are doubtless obliged to you for your spirited defense of their lil' Klan, even though you say you aren't affiliated with them.

So how come the Oaf Keepers didn't take their Oaf when Bush was in office?

I enjoy STY. It's fun to engage him. Now I will also enjoy engaging you.

If you call responding to another's posts obsession, how come you reply to mine?

Your point that an individuals' viewpoint cannot be held representative of a political group is well taken , or would be if you hadn't immdiately used your distaste for my opinions to stereotype "liberals".

BTW, you know nothing about me if you think I'm a liberal.

Dis-missed!
 
hey hey, I was wondering when some idiot obama supporter would bring out the 'hatriot' word. I was beginning to lose faith in you talking point morons.


You must not get much mental exercise in your daily life.

1. I am not an Obama supporter.
2. The term "hatriot" predates Obama's entrance into our national political life by some years. I first recall hearing it after Mr. McVeigh was caught.

Now, tell us he was "framed" and "the Murrah Building was an inside job", and it'll make my day.
 
Back
Top