Where is JD?

Jarod said:
...
Is it possible he doesn’t want his hands dirty with this war?

...
Click to expand...
^ this.

JD has been the biggest anti war, we are the party of isolationism and no foreign interventionism, guy in the party who was responsible for that messaging to all the Bro's who came out to support them.

They do not want media to put a microphone in his face and force him to go on the record right now, while the world is watching, to then hear him say why this war was the best thing ever and very necessary.
 
christiefan915 said:
The last time we tried regime change, Darth was front and center every single day.
Click to expand...
The last time we had an attempted regime change was when the brandon administration opened the borders and allowed millions of undocumented people into this country. Where was Heels Up Harris, who was charged with the duty to stop this attempted coup?
 
Lionfish said:
The last time we had an attempted regime change was when the brandon administration opened the borders and allowed millions of undocumented people into this country. Where was Heels Up Harris, who was charged with the duty to stop this attempted coup?
Click to expand...
LOL
 
TOP said:
I still don't believe that when I hear it.... But they're proclaiming failure loud and clear..... That didn't take long at all...
Walz Looked and sounded terrified.... and completely clueless...
Click to expand...
it's pretty obvious here

JD isn't hiding - he said the hostilities will be over shortly. those that hide don't also give predictions about things they hide from

so now the shit stains have to hope he is wrong---about things he said while "in hiding"

meanwhile, Iran is supported by terrorists and democrats - and they aren't hiding that either
 
TOP said:
I still don't believe that when I hear it.... But they're proclaiming failure loud and clear..... That didn't take long at all...
Walz Looked and sounded terrified.... and completely clueless...
Click to expand...
Walz and Frey are both up to their necks in fraud. It is hard to believe he could have been the VP
 
Phantasmal said:
You have absolutely no proof of that. Lies
Click to expand...
Jordan provided the COURT press release that said Walz lied. So YES there is proof Walz lied about restarting payments. He said the court ordered it but the court said that was a false statement. I'm guessing you did not watch Walz's testimony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Lionfish said:
The last time we had an attempted regime change was when the brandon administration opened the borders and allowed millions of undocumented people into this country. Where was Heels Up Harris, who was charged with the duty to stop this attempted coup?
Click to expand...
You have a short memory. There was a decent bipartisan border bill to address immigration problems, yet candidate trump coerced his toadies into killing it so he could use the immigration issue in his campaign. This falls on the GOP, not Dems.

"Vice President Kamala Harris criticized former President Donald Trump for lobbying GOP lawmakers against passing a bipartisan border bill at Tuesday night’s debate, as the debate over the bill that Trump opposed earlier this year has been revived ahead of the election, with Harris calling for the legislation to be resurrected.

Harris touted the bipartisan border bill that lawmakers introduced earlier this year at Tuesday night’s debate and criticized Trump for killing it to boost his own campaign, claiming, “He preferred to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem.”

Harris has frequently said ahead of the debate that her main priority on immigration if elected would be to pass the bipartisan border bill that failed to pass earlier this year—after a surge in border crossings in recent years became a political vulnerability for Democrats.

The Border Act of 2024 was originally introduced in February by Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., following months of negotiations with Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., and Murphy said the bill was also authored with the help of the White House and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. The bill quickly fell apart, however, as Trump vocally denounced the bill and urged Republicans not to pass it, calling it a “gift” to Democrats and writing on Truth Social, “A BAD BORDER DEAL IS FAR WORSE THAN NO BORDER DEAL.”

While Murphy told Politico lawmakers behind the bill initially believed they could get support from 20 to 25 Republicans, the legislation ultimately failed to advance in the Senate in a 49-50 vote. Murphy then reintroduced the bill in May, but it failed again in a 43-50 vote—with even Lankford now voting against it, as Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, was the only GOP senator to support the legislation.

The $118 billion bipartisan bill was sweeping legislation that Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told CNN was “probably the most extensive border funding and security package that we’ve seen in decades.”

The bill includes a number of provisions, such as imposing new restrictions on border crossings that would authorize the government to temporarily enact emergency measures and stop unauthorized crossings between official ports of entry if border crossings pass an average of 5,000 per day in a given week or 8,500 in a single day. The asylum process would also get an overhaul if the bill passed, including new restrictions, such as raising the legal standard to pass the initial assessment and giving asylum seekers fewer chances to have their case appealed before they’re forced to leave the country. The legislation would increase the use of alternatives to immigration detention facilities—like having immigrants wear ankle monitors—until their cases are heard. Those restrictions are balanced out by other measures that are more permissive toward immigration, however, like increasing funding for legal representation for minors under age 13, giving a pathway to citizenship for some immigrants from Afghanistan and increasing the number of job and family visas given each year for three years. The initial bill also earmarked approximately $60 billion in aid to Ukraine—after some Republicans opposed any aid being sent to Ukraine without being tied to border restrictions—on top of other funding that included $20.2 billion for border security improvements and $2.3 billion in assistance to refugees in the U.S.

 
FastLane said:
Jordan provided the COURT press release that said Walz lied. So YES there is proof Walz lied about restarting payments. He said the court ordered it but the court said that was a false statement. I'm guessing you did not watch Walz's testimony.
Click to expand...
Jordan
🤪🤣🤣🤣🤣

I don’t believe anything Jordan says, you shouldn’t either. He is a documented liar.

I’ll wait for the criminal charges to be brought against them and proven in a court of law. Look how many the MAGAs have tried to bring fake charges against and failed. It’s quite a yrs k record of failure.
 
christiefan915 said:
You have a short memory. There was a decent bipartisan border bill to address immigration problems, yet candidate trump coerced his toadies into killing it so he could use the immigration issue in his campaign. This falls on the GOP, not Dems.

"Vice President Kamala Harris criticized former President Donald Trump for lobbying GOP lawmakers against passing a bipartisan border bill at Tuesday night’s debate, as the debate over the bill that Trump opposed earlier this year has been revived ahead of the election, with Harris calling for the legislation to be resurrected.

Harris touted the bipartisan border bill that lawmakers introduced earlier this year at Tuesday night’s debate and criticized Trump for killing it to boost his own campaign, claiming, “He preferred to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem.”

Harris has frequently said ahead of the debate that her main priority on immigration if elected would be to pass the bipartisan border bill that failed to pass earlier this year—after a surge in border crossings in recent years became a political vulnerability for Democrats.

The Border Act of 2024 was originally introduced in February by Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., following months of negotiations with Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., and Murphy said the bill was also authored with the help of the White House and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. The bill quickly fell apart, however, as Trump vocally denounced the bill and urged Republicans not to pass it, calling it a “gift” to Democrats and writing on Truth Social, “A BAD BORDER DEAL IS FAR WORSE THAN NO BORDER DEAL.”

While Murphy told Politico lawmakers behind the bill initially believed they could get support from 20 to 25 Republicans, the legislation ultimately failed to advance in the Senate in a 49-50 vote. Murphy then reintroduced the bill in May, but it failed again in a 43-50 vote—with even Lankford now voting against it, as Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, was the only GOP senator to support the legislation.

The $118 billion bipartisan bill was sweeping legislation that Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told CNN was “probably the most extensive border funding and security package that we’ve seen in decades.”

The bill includes a number of provisions, such as imposing new restrictions on border crossings that would authorize the government to temporarily enact emergency measures and stop unauthorized crossings between official ports of entry if border crossings pass an average of 5,000 per day in a given week or 8,500 in a single day. The asylum process would also get an overhaul if the bill passed, including new restrictions, such as raising the legal standard to pass the initial assessment and giving asylum seekers fewer chances to have their case appealed before they’re forced to leave the country. The legislation would increase the use of alternatives to immigration detention facilities—like having immigrants wear ankle monitors—until their cases are heard. Those restrictions are balanced out by other measures that are more permissive toward immigration, however, like increasing funding for legal representation for minors under age 13, giving a pathway to citizenship for some immigrants from Afghanistan and increasing the number of job and family visas given each year for three years. The initial bill also earmarked approximately $60 billion in aid to Ukraine—after some Republicans opposed any aid being sent to Ukraine without being tied to border restrictions—on top of other funding that included $20.2 billion for border security improvements and $2.3 billion in assistance to refugees in the U.S.

Click to expand...
The Dems said they needed a bill to stop illegal immigration. That was BS. We just needed a President that enforced the law that we have already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top